Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Study of Photographs of Interest in Training to Obtain Good Reproducibility of the Diagnosis of Perianal Lesions of Crohn's Disease Inspection in Internal Gastroenterology (PhotoCrohn)

7. september 2017 opdateret af: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

The diagnosis of LAP (lesions Ano-perineal) requires the inspection, palpation, anoscopy and possibly additional examinations including endoscopy and imaging; any of these steps of the diagnosis can only be replaced by another.

In the absence of data in the literature on the evaluation of specific LAP Crohn inspection, Clemence Horaist et al established definitions of these lesions inspection with the help of an expert group, then evaluated the diagnostic agreement LAP these definitions in the same group from a selection of photographs. Definitions ulceration, fistula, inflammatory external os, erythema and abscess had an acceptable agreement diagnosis (kappa> 0.70)

The LAP is a predictor of severe Crohn's disease, hepato any gastroenterologist it is appropriate that recognizes and adopts adequate care, this care has been a consensus in 2014. The interns Hepato gastroenterology must learn during their training to know the terminology of LAP Crohn inspection and to recognize so considered acceptable by experts.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Study Objectives:

In this context, the investigators work is to show that training giving the consensus definitions of Crohn's lesions on inspection and typical images of these lesions is effective to enable students to achieve a level of diagnosis of these lesions acceptable to experts (ideally not significantly different from that of the experts). Assuming alternates, we will identify difficult diagnosis of lesions for students to find the most appropriate teaching method

Inclusion criteria: all Gastroenterology Hepato-house of France (including overseas territories)

Methodology:

non-interventional multicentre prospective study

February 2015 to July 2015

Statistical analysis: Clinical Research Centre of the coordinating center. Quantitative variables are expressed by their mean, standard deviations, their minimum and maximum values as appropriate. The variables will be expressed in numbers and percentages.

Development of the study:

  • A broad group of experts (19 proctology and a dermatologist) will be contacted to choose two typical images of LAP (superficial ulceration, deep ulceration ...) from a selection of photos and give their opinions about fistula definition proposal. (Photos used does not identify patients, they have just typical lesions of LAP)

Typical pictures chosen by the experts will be integrated into the training material issued after 1 internal questionnaire. This support will appear on one page and resume the definitions established by experts with or without the typical pictures.

  • Internal Gastroenterology France (about 470 domestic total) will be contacted by email, their department heads have been told that work.
  • Internal will inform their characteristics:

    • Internal details: name, email address
    • Year boarding.
    • boarding area.
    • Validation IUD (inter-university degree) 1st / 2nd year of proctology.
    • Conducting an internal internship in a proctology service?
    • Participation in specific courses on the LAP?
    • buddy Training on LAP?
  • Sending a first questionnaire to internal Google Drive: description pictures of LAP (12 photos lesion initially selected by experts) using checkboxes. Eg ulceration: YES / NO / DO NOT KNOW (Figure 1). The Google Drive platform enables automatic input results in a Microsoft Excel database.
  • Draw (using a randomization list EXCEL based on the random function of EXCEL) of 2 groups:

    • Group A (training with typical definitions established + photos)
    • Group B (only definitions)
  • Sending mail to the board of education, different depending on the group, the internal will have as long as they wish
  • Sending a second questionnaire with pictures of different LAP those of the first questionnaire. Answers by checkboxes.
  • Analysis: a schedule will each questionnaire with a weighting based on the primary / secondary diagnosis. A comparison of pre and post training scores will be performed. And this difference may be calculated between the two groups A and B. In addition, the difficult diagnosis of lesions will be identified.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

249

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Ile-de-France
      • Paris, Ile-de-France, Frankrig, 75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Internal gastro enterology in France (about 470 domestic total) will be contacted by email, their department heads have been warned of this work

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Internal gastro enterology in France will be contacted by email, their department heads have been warned of this work

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Internals who refuses the assessment

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
training with typical definitions established + photos
A broad group of experts (19 proctology and a dermatologist) will be contacted to choose two typical images of LAP (superficial ulceration, deep ulceration ...). 12 photos lesion initially selected by experts.
A broad group of experts (19 proctology and a dermatologist) will be contacted to choose two typical images of LAP (superficial ulceration, deep ulceration ...). 12 photos lesion initially selected by experts.
Training only with definitions
Interns will receive typical definitions of LAP stages

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Assessment of the level (quality) of internal diagnosis of Perianal Lesions of Crohn's Disease Inspection
Tidsramme: within 1 week after training

Assessment the test scores after the training.

The test conssite to evaluate whether training giving the consensus definitions of Crohn's lesions on inspection and typical images of these lesions is effective to enable students to achieve a good level of diagnosis of these lesions acceptable for experts (ideally not significantly different from that of the experts).

within 1 week after training

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: DE PARADES Vincent, MD, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph (FRANCE)

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

30. juni 2016

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

31. maj 2017

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

31. juli 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

13. juli 2016

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

21. juli 2016

Først opslået (Skøn)

22. juli 2016

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

8. september 2017

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

7. september 2017

Sidst verificeret

1. september 2017

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

UBESLUTET

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner