Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Study of Photographs of Interest in Training to Obtain Good Reproducibility of the Diagnosis of Perianal Lesions of Crohn's Disease Inspection in Internal Gastroenterology (PhotoCrohn)

7. September 2017 aktualisiert von: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

The diagnosis of LAP (lesions Ano-perineal) requires the inspection, palpation, anoscopy and possibly additional examinations including endoscopy and imaging; any of these steps of the diagnosis can only be replaced by another.

In the absence of data in the literature on the evaluation of specific LAP Crohn inspection, Clemence Horaist et al established definitions of these lesions inspection with the help of an expert group, then evaluated the diagnostic agreement LAP these definitions in the same group from a selection of photographs. Definitions ulceration, fistula, inflammatory external os, erythema and abscess had an acceptable agreement diagnosis (kappa> 0.70)

The LAP is a predictor of severe Crohn's disease, hepato any gastroenterologist it is appropriate that recognizes and adopts adequate care, this care has been a consensus in 2014. The interns Hepato gastroenterology must learn during their training to know the terminology of LAP Crohn inspection and to recognize so considered acceptable by experts.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Study Objectives:

In this context, the investigators work is to show that training giving the consensus definitions of Crohn's lesions on inspection and typical images of these lesions is effective to enable students to achieve a level of diagnosis of these lesions acceptable to experts (ideally not significantly different from that of the experts). Assuming alternates, we will identify difficult diagnosis of lesions for students to find the most appropriate teaching method

Inclusion criteria: all Gastroenterology Hepato-house of France (including overseas territories)

Methodology:

non-interventional multicentre prospective study

February 2015 to July 2015

Statistical analysis: Clinical Research Centre of the coordinating center. Quantitative variables are expressed by their mean, standard deviations, their minimum and maximum values as appropriate. The variables will be expressed in numbers and percentages.

Development of the study:

  • A broad group of experts (19 proctology and a dermatologist) will be contacted to choose two typical images of LAP (superficial ulceration, deep ulceration ...) from a selection of photos and give their opinions about fistula definition proposal. (Photos used does not identify patients, they have just typical lesions of LAP)

Typical pictures chosen by the experts will be integrated into the training material issued after 1 internal questionnaire. This support will appear on one page and resume the definitions established by experts with or without the typical pictures.

  • Internal Gastroenterology France (about 470 domestic total) will be contacted by email, their department heads have been told that work.
  • Internal will inform their characteristics:

    • Internal details: name, email address
    • Year boarding.
    • boarding area.
    • Validation IUD (inter-university degree) 1st / 2nd year of proctology.
    • Conducting an internal internship in a proctology service?
    • Participation in specific courses on the LAP?
    • buddy Training on LAP?
  • Sending a first questionnaire to internal Google Drive: description pictures of LAP (12 photos lesion initially selected by experts) using checkboxes. Eg ulceration: YES / NO / DO NOT KNOW (Figure 1). The Google Drive platform enables automatic input results in a Microsoft Excel database.
  • Draw (using a randomization list EXCEL based on the random function of EXCEL) of 2 groups:

    • Group A (training with typical definitions established + photos)
    • Group B (only definitions)
  • Sending mail to the board of education, different depending on the group, the internal will have as long as they wish
  • Sending a second questionnaire with pictures of different LAP those of the first questionnaire. Answers by checkboxes.
  • Analysis: a schedule will each questionnaire with a weighting based on the primary / secondary diagnosis. A comparison of pre and post training scores will be performed. And this difference may be calculated between the two groups A and B. In addition, the difficult diagnosis of lesions will be identified.

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

249

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Ile-de-France
      • Paris, Ile-de-France, Frankreich, 75014
        • Groupe hospitalier Paris saint Joseph

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind
  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Probenahmeverfahren

Wahrscheinlichkeitsstichprobe

Studienpopulation

Internal gastro enterology in France (about 470 domestic total) will be contacted by email, their department heads have been warned of this work

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Internal gastro enterology in France will be contacted by email, their department heads have been warned of this work

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Internals who refuses the assessment

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

Kohorten und Interventionen

Gruppe / Kohorte
Intervention / Behandlung
training with typical definitions established + photos
A broad group of experts (19 proctology and a dermatologist) will be contacted to choose two typical images of LAP (superficial ulceration, deep ulceration ...). 12 photos lesion initially selected by experts.
A broad group of experts (19 proctology and a dermatologist) will be contacted to choose two typical images of LAP (superficial ulceration, deep ulceration ...). 12 photos lesion initially selected by experts.
Training only with definitions
Interns will receive typical definitions of LAP stages

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Assessment of the level (quality) of internal diagnosis of Perianal Lesions of Crohn's Disease Inspection
Zeitfenster: within 1 week after training

Assessment the test scores after the training.

The test conssite to evaluate whether training giving the consensus definitions of Crohn's lesions on inspection and typical images of these lesions is effective to enable students to achieve a good level of diagnosis of these lesions acceptable for experts (ideally not significantly different from that of the experts).

within 1 week after training

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: DE PARADES Vincent, MD, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph (FRANCE)

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

30. Juni 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Mai 2017

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Juli 2017

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

13. Juli 2016

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

21. Juli 2016

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

22. Juli 2016

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

8. September 2017

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

7. September 2017

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. September 2017

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren