Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Study of Photographs of Interest in Training to Obtain Good Reproducibility of the Diagnosis of Perianal Lesions of Crohn's Disease Inspection in Internal Gastroenterology (PhotoCrohn)

7 de septiembre de 2017 actualizado por: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

The diagnosis of LAP (lesions Ano-perineal) requires the inspection, palpation, anoscopy and possibly additional examinations including endoscopy and imaging; any of these steps of the diagnosis can only be replaced by another.

In the absence of data in the literature on the evaluation of specific LAP Crohn inspection, Clemence Horaist et al established definitions of these lesions inspection with the help of an expert group, then evaluated the diagnostic agreement LAP these definitions in the same group from a selection of photographs. Definitions ulceration, fistula, inflammatory external os, erythema and abscess had an acceptable agreement diagnosis (kappa> 0.70)

The LAP is a predictor of severe Crohn's disease, hepato any gastroenterologist it is appropriate that recognizes and adopts adequate care, this care has been a consensus in 2014. The interns Hepato gastroenterology must learn during their training to know the terminology of LAP Crohn inspection and to recognize so considered acceptable by experts.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

Study Objectives:

In this context, the investigators work is to show that training giving the consensus definitions of Crohn's lesions on inspection and typical images of these lesions is effective to enable students to achieve a level of diagnosis of these lesions acceptable to experts (ideally not significantly different from that of the experts). Assuming alternates, we will identify difficult diagnosis of lesions for students to find the most appropriate teaching method

Inclusion criteria: all Gastroenterology Hepato-house of France (including overseas territories)

Methodology:

non-interventional multicentre prospective study

February 2015 to July 2015

Statistical analysis: Clinical Research Centre of the coordinating center. Quantitative variables are expressed by their mean, standard deviations, their minimum and maximum values as appropriate. The variables will be expressed in numbers and percentages.

Development of the study:

  • A broad group of experts (19 proctology and a dermatologist) will be contacted to choose two typical images of LAP (superficial ulceration, deep ulceration ...) from a selection of photos and give their opinions about fistula definition proposal. (Photos used does not identify patients, they have just typical lesions of LAP)

Typical pictures chosen by the experts will be integrated into the training material issued after 1 internal questionnaire. This support will appear on one page and resume the definitions established by experts with or without the typical pictures.

  • Internal Gastroenterology France (about 470 domestic total) will be contacted by email, their department heads have been told that work.
  • Internal will inform their characteristics:

    • Internal details: name, email address
    • Year boarding.
    • boarding area.
    • Validation IUD (inter-university degree) 1st / 2nd year of proctology.
    • Conducting an internal internship in a proctology service?
    • Participation in specific courses on the LAP?
    • buddy Training on LAP?
  • Sending a first questionnaire to internal Google Drive: description pictures of LAP (12 photos lesion initially selected by experts) using checkboxes. Eg ulceration: YES / NO / DO NOT KNOW (Figure 1). The Google Drive platform enables automatic input results in a Microsoft Excel database.
  • Draw (using a randomization list EXCEL based on the random function of EXCEL) of 2 groups:

    • Group A (training with typical definitions established + photos)
    • Group B (only definitions)
  • Sending mail to the board of education, different depending on the group, the internal will have as long as they wish
  • Sending a second questionnaire with pictures of different LAP those of the first questionnaire. Answers by checkboxes.
  • Analysis: a schedule will each questionnaire with a weighting based on the primary / secondary diagnosis. A comparison of pre and post training scores will be performed. And this difference may be calculated between the two groups A and B. In addition, the difficult diagnosis of lesions will be identified.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

249

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Ile-de-France
      • Paris, Ile-de-France, Francia, 75014
        • Groupe hospitalier Paris saint Joseph

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra de probabilidad

Población de estudio

Internal gastro enterology in France (about 470 domestic total) will be contacted by email, their department heads have been warned of this work

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Internal gastro enterology in France will be contacted by email, their department heads have been warned of this work

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Internals who refuses the assessment

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
training with typical definitions established + photos
A broad group of experts (19 proctology and a dermatologist) will be contacted to choose two typical images of LAP (superficial ulceration, deep ulceration ...). 12 photos lesion initially selected by experts.
A broad group of experts (19 proctology and a dermatologist) will be contacted to choose two typical images of LAP (superficial ulceration, deep ulceration ...). 12 photos lesion initially selected by experts.
Training only with definitions
Interns will receive typical definitions of LAP stages

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Assessment of the level (quality) of internal diagnosis of Perianal Lesions of Crohn's Disease Inspection
Periodo de tiempo: within 1 week after training

Assessment the test scores after the training.

The test conssite to evaluate whether training giving the consensus definitions of Crohn's lesions on inspection and typical images of these lesions is effective to enable students to achieve a good level of diagnosis of these lesions acceptable for experts (ideally not significantly different from that of the experts).

within 1 week after training

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: DE PARADES Vincent, MD, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph (FRANCE)

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

30 de junio de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

31 de mayo de 2017

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

31 de julio de 2017

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

13 de julio de 2016

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

21 de julio de 2016

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

22 de julio de 2016

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

8 de septiembre de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

7 de septiembre de 2017

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir