Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Dentists' Understanding of Diagnostic Test Results and Treatment Efficacy. (RCDENT2017)

10. februar 2017 opdateret af: Paulo Nadanovsky, Rio de Janeiro State University

The Influence of Different Formats for Presenting Diagnostic Test Results and Treatment Efficacy on Dentists' Understanding and on Their Reported Clinical Management.

There is little evidence on how best to present diagnostic and treatment effect information to dentists and whether this makes any difference to their understanding of the information given and clinical management. The objective of this study is to assess the influence of different formats for presenting diagnostic test results and treatment efficacy on dentists' understanding and on their reported clinical management. The hypothesis is that presenting diagnostic test and treatment effectiveness results using natural frequencies influences the threshold for treatment and improves interpretation of tests results compared to conditional probabilities and percentage differences. A group of dentists recruited from postgraduate courses were randomized to two of four arms, being two arms of a hypothetical realistic diagnostic scenario (a) and two arms of a hypothetical realistic treatment scenario (b): a1) diagnostic test results presented in conditional probabilities; a2) diagnostic test results presented in natural frequencies; b1) treatment efficacy presented in percentages; b2) treatment efficacy presented in natural frequencies. The main outcome measures were the correct answer as to whether disease was actually present (post-test probability) and the correct answer as the number of patients that would benefit from the treatment (efficacy). Secondary outcome measures included the decision whether to treat or not treat the hypothetical patient.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

101

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Graduated dentist undergoing a postgraduate course in a public university in Rio de Janeiro.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Firedobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Diagnostic percentages.
Dentist receives diagnostic test results presented in conditional probabilities.
The format in which dentists receive information about diagnostic test results and efficacy of treatment.
Eksperimentel: Diagnostic frequencies
Dentist receives diagnostic test results presented in natural frequencies.
The format in which dentists receive information about diagnostic test results and efficacy of treatment.
Aktiv komparator: Treatment percentages.
Dentist receives treatment efficacy presented in percentages.
The format in which dentists receive information about diagnostic test results and efficacy of treatment.
Eksperimentel: Treatment frequencies.
Dentist receives treatment efficacy presented in natural frequencies.
The format in which dentists receive information about diagnostic test results and efficacy of treatment.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
The probability that a patient will have a dental cavity as assessed by a dentist.
Tidsramme: Up to 20 minutes
The assessement by the dentist was based on a questionnarie containing a clinical hypothetical situation and the result of a bite-wing radiographic exam.
Up to 20 minutes
The number of patients that will benefit from systemic antibiotics adjunct to periodontal treatment as assessed by a dentist.
Tidsramme: Up to 20 minutes
The assessement by the dentist was based on a questionnarie containing a clinical hypothetical situation and the information about the usual efficacy of systemic antibiotics adjunct to periodontal treatment.
Up to 20 minutes

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
The number of dentists that would recommend the use of systemic antibiotics adjunct to periodontal treatment in the clinical management of a patient with periodontal disease.
Tidsramme: Up to 20 minutes
The recommendation by the dentist was based on a questionnarie containing a clinical hypothetical situation and the information about the usual efficacy of systemic antibiotics adjunct to periodontal treatment.
Up to 20 minutes

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

8. juni 2016

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

13. december 2016

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

13. december 2016

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

6. februar 2017

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

10. februar 2017

Først opslået (Faktiske)

13. februar 2017

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

13. februar 2017

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

10. februar 2017

Sidst verificeret

1. februar 2017

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • riskcommunicationdentist2017

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner