Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Promoting Shared-decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer (PROSHADE)

16. maj 2022 opdateret af: Blanca Juana Lumbreras Lacarra, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche
In this project, the investigators aim to evaluate the most appropriate design and implementation strategy of a decision-aid to promote shared-decision making in prostate cancer screening.

Studieoversigt

Status

Ikke rekrutterer endnu

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Prostate cancer (PC) screening using Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) has led to a reduction in advanced disease and disease-specific mortality. However, screening with PSA can also cause harm and is associated with false-positive results and overdiagnosis.

Shared-decision making (SDM) has been defined as the key to successful patient-centered care. The promotion SDM when deciding on PSA screening will have proximal effects such as the development of collaborative deliberation between clinicians and patients, resulting in well-informed patients and in preference-based decisions. As long term effects, it will result in safer, cost-effective, patient-aligned healthcare, and its distant effects will include improvements in resource use, planning processes and improved health outcomes.

The project includes a mixed-method approach. The investigators will perform a quantitative survey (cross-sectional design) to evaluate the population, patients' and clinicians' knowledge about the benefits and risks derived from the PSA determination and the available recommendations.

The investigators will apply qualitative analysis through focus groups, to explore the challenges patients and clinicians face to deep in a prostate screening discussion and to assess the adequacy of different implementation strategies.

The investigators will carry out a user-testing design based on mix-methods (questionnaire and semi-structured review) to evaluate the prototype of the initial decision-aid.

Finally, the investigators will carry out a cluster randomised controlled trial, to assess the results derived from the application of the decision-aid, together with a process evaluation using a combination of both qualitative and quantitative methods to monitor the fidelity of the intervention, the clusters' and patients' response to the intervention as well as the mechanisms of adaptation and change at the intervention.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Forventet)

1781

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Group 1 (patients): Men living in the Valencian Community, Spain. Group 2 (general practitioners): Primary care doctors working in the Valencian Community, Spain.

Group 3 (urologists): Urologists working in the Valencian Community, Spain.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients:

    • Men >40 years old
    • Men who have not had prostate cancer
  2. General practitioners:

    • Primary care doctors working in the Valencian Community, Spain.
  3. Urologists:

    • Urologists working in the Valencian Community, Spain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients: None
  2. General practitioners: None
  3. Urologists: None

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: Andet
  • Tidsperspektiver: Tværsnit

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
Patients

Quantitative study: Surveys: 1,067 out of a total of 1,389,725 people of residents of the Valencian Community, Spain. Three groups with quota control: proportional to age (40-50; 50-70; > 70 years) of men aged 40 and over who have not had prostate cancer from each stratum (geographical area and population habitat).

Qualitative study: general population focus groups: 3

Quantitative survey (cross-sectional design) and qualitative analysis (focus groups)
General Practitioners

Quantitative study: 369 General Practitioners working in two Health Departments in the Valencian Community, Spain (Dept of Health Alicante, General Hospital 19, 255,439 habitants) and (Dept of Health Alicante, S Juan Alicante 17, 233,115 habitants).

Qualitative study: general practitioners focus groups: 2.

Quantitative survey (cross-sectional design) and qualitative analysis (focus groups)
Urologists
Quantitative study: 345 Urologists working in Valencian Community, Spain Qualitative study: urologists focus groups: 1.
Quantitative survey (cross-sectional design) and qualitative analysis (focus groups)

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Patients' and clinicians' knowledge on PSA test questionnaire developed by the investigators
Tidsramme: December 2022
Quantitative questionnaire to evaluate the target population and clinicians' knowledge about the PSA benefits/risks and the available recommendations. The investigators will develop an ad hoc questionnaire which will be validated through the Delphi Method.
December 2022
Patients' and clinicians' opinions on PSA test
Tidsramme: March 2023
Focus groups to explore qualitatively the challenge patients and clinicians face when discussing prostate cancer screening and to assess their preferences about different designs and implementation strategies.
March 2023
Number of patients who participated in a shared-decision making with their clinicians when receiving a PSA test
Tidsramme: December 2023
The investigators will assess the number of patients who participate in a shared- decision making with their clinicians when receiving a PSA test. To assess it, the investigators, through a randomized clinical trial, will apply a new decision-aid developed to a group of patients which will be compared with another group which will have normal care.
December 2023

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Forventet)

1. juli 2022

Primær færdiggørelse (Forventet)

1. december 2022

Studieafslutning (Forventet)

1. december 2023

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

9. december 2021

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

24. december 2021

Først opslået (Faktiske)

12. januar 2022

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

17. maj 2022

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

16. maj 2022

Sidst verificeret

1. maj 2022

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • PI20/01334

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner