Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Sedation vs No Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated COPD Patients (SEDvsNO-COPD)

27. maj 2026 opdateret af: Mohamed Anter Elsayed, Al-Azhar University

Compareson Between Sedation and No Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of no-sedation compared to daily interruption of sedation (DIS) in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Mechanical ventilation is associated with discomfort, anxiety, and agitation, often requiring sedation. However, excessive sedation may worsen outcomes, especially in COPD patients with respiratory failure. This randomized controlled trial will include 100 adult COPD patients admitted to the respiratory ICU and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups: one managed with daily interruption of sedation and the other managed with a no-sedation protocol. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days, while secondary outcomes include ICU length of stay, complications, difficulty of weaning, and nursing workload.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Mechanical ventilation is a stressful experience for critically ill patients, often associated with pain, discomfort, and anxiety due to invasive procedures, environmental factors, and underlying disease. Sedation is commonly used in intensive care units to improve patient comfort and tolerance to mechanical ventilation. However, excessive sedation has been associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer ICU stay, and increased complications.

Daily interruption of sedation (DIS) has been introduced to reduce sedation-related complications and improve outcomes. Recent trends support minimizing sedation and promoting patient comfort using alternative approaches. However, the optimal sedation strategy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unclear, especially in those with hypercapnic respiratory failure, where sedative drugs may worsen respiratory depression.

This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted in the respiratory intensive care unit at Al-Azhar University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt 100 adult patients with COPD exacerbation requiring invasive mechanical ventilation will be enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups:

Group A (control group): Patients will receive sedation using midazolam infusion with daily interruption guided by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).

Group B (intervention group): Patients will be managed with a no-sedation protocol. Sedation will only be administered if clinically indicated due to agitation or discomfort.

All patients will receive standard medical treatment for COPD and will be monitored clinically and by laboratory and radiological investigations. Weaning from mechanical ventilation will be performed according to standard criteria.

The primary outcome is ventilator-free days. Secondary outcomes include ICU length of stay, incidence of complications, difficulty of weaning, and nursing workload.

Ethical approval has been obtained, and informed consent will be secured from patients or their legal representatives before enrollment.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

100

Fase

  • Fase 2

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Asyut, Egypten
        • Al-Azhar University Hospital, Assiut

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

Adult patients (≥18 years old). Patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.

Previously diagnosed COPD confirmed by post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 70%. Patients admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (ICU).

Exclusion Criteria:

Known allergy to midazolam. Renal impairment. Hepatic impairment. Active malignancy (cancer). Psychiatric disorders. Neurological disorders. Pregnancy.

-

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Daily Interruption of Sedation (DIS)
Patients will receive continuous sedation using midazolam infusion with daily interruption guided by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).
Midazolam will be given as needed in bolus doses if agitation occurs.
Eksperimentel: No Sedation Protocol
Patients will be managed without continuous sedation.Sedation will be administered only if clinically indicated due to agitation or discomfort.
Midazolam will be given as needed in bolus doses if agitation occurs.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Ventilator-free days during the first 28 days after initiation of mechanical ventilation
Tidsramme: 28 days after enrollment
Number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation within 28 days after enrollment.
28 days after enrollment

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Incidence of complications during ICU stay
Tidsramme: During ICU stay, assessed daily up to 28 days
Occurrence of complications including ventilator-associated pneumonia, hemodynamic instability, or need for reintubation during ICU stay.
During ICU stay, assessed daily up to 28 days
Length of ICU stay
Tidsramme: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, up to 28 days
Duration of stay in the intensive care unit measured in days from ICU admission until discharge.
From ICU admission to ICU discharge, up to 28 days
Difficulty of weaning from mechanical ventilation
Tidsramme: From initiation of weaning until successful liberation from mechanical ventilation or ICU discharge (up to 28 days)
Assessment of weaning difficulty based on duration of weaning process, number of spontaneous breathing trial failures, and need for prolonged mechanical ventilation.
From initiation of weaning until successful liberation from mechanical ventilation or ICU discharge (up to 28 days)

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

14. april 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

7. april 2026

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

10. april 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

13. maj 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

27. maj 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

2. juni 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

2. juni 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

27. maj 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. maj 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner