Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Two Cycles Versus Three Cyclle of CCRT for Low Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

8. November 2016 aktualisiert von: Hai-Qiang Mai,MD,PhD, Sun Yat-sen University

A Randomized Phase II Non-inferiority Study of Two Cycles Versus Three Cycles of Cisplatin Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Low Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Pretreatment Plasma EBV DNA Level

This is a Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of two cycles versus three cycles of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in treating patients with Low Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma based on pretreatment plasma EBV DNA.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Southern China and Southeast Asia. Several prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that concurrent chemoradiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC. Concurrently, although cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy was considered as the standard regimen for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, several prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that only 52-63% patients can finished three cycles cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy( DDP, 100mg/m2,D1,D22 and D43), due to chemoradiotherapy induced toxicity. Combined analyses of NPC-9901 and NPC-9902 Trials indicated that the 5-year locoregional failure free survival was insignificant between the patients received between two and three cycles cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Our previous studies have also demonstrated that the five years overall survival, distant metastasis free survival and 5-year locoregional failure free survival was not observed significant difference between the patients received between two and three cycles cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy. It indicated that one pressing questions remain to be resolved: can we define the optimal dose so that we can reduce toxicity by avoiding unnecessary overdose or an ineffective phase of treatment? Recently, the quantification of pretreatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA, which was considered the most potential biomarker to compliment TNM stage, was demonstrated a useful biomarker for the risk stratification, monitoring and prediction of the prognosis of NPC. The investigators previous study demonstrated that for local and regionally advanced NPC patients with EBV DNA <4,000copies/mL, the 3-year's PFS and DMFS was approximate to 90%. Pretreatment plasma EBV DNA levels might be applied to guide concurrent chemotherapy regimen for local and regionally advanced NPC patients. Therefore, the investigators make a hypothesis that the low risk locoregionally advanced NPC patients received two cycles of chemotherapy may gain similar long-term survival as those received three cycles of chemotherapy, leading to less chemotherapy induced toxicity. Therefore, this phase II non-inferiority, randomised controlled clinical trial was designed to assess efficacy for low-risk patients, identified with pretreatment plasma EBV DNA <4,000 copies/mL, received two cycle cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared with three cycle cisplatin-based chemotherapy

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Voraussichtlich)

236

Phase

  • Phase 2

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Rekrutierung
        • Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 70 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including WHO II or III
  • Original clinical staged as T3-4N0-3 M0 or any T、N2-3M0(according to the 7th AJCC edition)
  • No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
  • Pretreatment Plasm EB Virus DNA<4000copies/ml
  • Male and no pregnant female
  • Satisfactory performance status: ECOG (Eastern Cooperative OncologyGroup) scale 0-1
  • WBC ≥ 4×109 /L and PLT ≥4×109 /L and HGB ≥90 g/L
  • With normal liver function test (ALT、AST ≤ 2.5×ULN, TBIL≤ 2.0×ULN)
  • With normal renal function test (Creatinine ≤ 1.5×ULN)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients have evidence of relapse or distant metastasis
  • Histologically confirmed keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (WHO I)
  • Receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy previously
  • The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness
  • Women of child-bearing potential who are pregnant or breastfeeding because of the potentially dangerous effects of the preparative chemotherapy on the fetus or infant.
  • Receiving other ways of anti-cancer therapy.
  • Suffered from other malignant tumors (except the cure of basal cell carcinoma or uterine cervical carcinoma in situ) previously.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Two cycle CCRT
Concurrent cisplatin(100mg/m2,D1,D22)combine with IMRT
Concurrent cisplatin (100mg/m2,D1,D22) combine with IMRT
Andere Namen:
  • DDP
Concurrent cisplatin (100mg/m2,D1,D22 and D43) combine with IMRT
Andere Namen:
  • DDP
Aktiver Komparator: Three cycle CCRT
Concurrent cisplatin(100mg/m2,D1,D22 and D43)combine with IMRT
Concurrent cisplatin (100mg/m2,D1,D22) combine with IMRT
Andere Namen:
  • DDP
Concurrent cisplatin (100mg/m2,D1,D22 and D43) combine with IMRT
Andere Namen:
  • DDP

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Progress-free survival
Zeitfenster: 3 years
Progress-free survival is calculated from the date of randomization to the date of the first progress at any site or death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up
3 years

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
The shor-term toxic effects
Zeitfenster: 3 months
The shorterm toxic effects were assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0)
3 months
Complete Response (CR)
Zeitfenster: after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment (up to 9 weeks)
CR assessed by independent reviewers, according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Disease response evaluated after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment. Complete response defined as the complete disappearance of the target and non-target lesion(s) identified at baseline after radiological evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) only
after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment (up to 9 weeks)
Overall Survival(OS)
Zeitfenster: 3 years
The OS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up
3 years
Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival(LRRFS)
Zeitfenster: 3 years
The LRRFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first locoregional relapse or until the date of the last follow-up visit
3 years
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)
Zeitfenster: 3 years
The DMFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first distant metastases or until the date of the last follow-up visit
3 years
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Zeitfenster: 3 years
The cost (including direct cost drug fees, inspection fees, expenses and nursing cost) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated between two arms
3 years
The monitoring of plasma EBV DNA
Zeitfenster: 3 years
The plasma EBV DNA will be detected before treatment ,during treatment (weekly) and during follow up( every 3-6 months)
3 years
Long-term toxicities
Zeitfenster: 3 years
Patients will be monitored for long-term toxicity by standard NIH criteria. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTCQLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ Head and Neck
3 years

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. August 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Voraussichtlich)

1. Juli 2018

Studienabschluss (Voraussichtlich)

1. Juli 2021

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

17. Juli 2016

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

17. August 2016

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

18. August 2016

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)

10. November 2016

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

8. November 2016

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. November 2016

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren