Loading Regimen，Serum Trough Concentrations，Efficacy and Safety in Pneumonia Patients With Gram-positive Infections
21. Juli 2017 aktualisiert von: LIjuan Zhou, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University
A Retrospective Study of Relationships Between Loading Regimen，Serum Trough Concentrations，Efficacy and Safety in Pneumonia Patients With Gram-positive Infections Treated With Teicoplanin
This was a retrospective study that all teicoplanin-treated adult patients with Gram-positive infections admitted to Zhengzhou Central Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University from February 2015 to August 2016.
Studienübersicht
Status
Abgeschlossen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
- Patients and protocol This was a retrospective study that all teicoplanin-treated adult patients with Gram-positive infections admitted to Zhengzhou Central Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University from February 2015 to August 2016. Patients were included who met the following criteria: (1) age≥18 years, (2) duration of teicoplanin therapy≥5 days, (3) written informed consent was obtained from each patients. Patients were excluded who fulfilled any of the following criteria: (1) Patients who were allergy to teicoplanin, (2) pregnant women, (3) patients with hematopoietic function, (4) patients unable to evaluate efficacy and safety. This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Zhengzhou Central Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University.
- Treatment regimen and groups According to CLcr and teicoplanin loading dose regimen, all patients were divided into four groups. Group A (CLcr≥60mL/min) : Teicoplanin was intravenously administered 3 times for moderate infections (skin, soft tissue and respiratory infections) or 6 times for severe infections(endocarditis caused by MRSA or severe pneumonia) at the loading dose of 400 mg at 12h intervals, followed by maintenance dosing 400 mg/d. Group B (40 mL/min≤CLcr<60mL/min) : Teicoplanin was intravenously administered 3 times at the loading dose of 400 mg at 12h intervals, followed by maintenance dosing 400 mg/d. Group C (CLcr<40mL/min) : Teicoplanin was intravenously administered 2 times at the loading dose of 400 mg at 12h intervals, followed by maintenance dosing 200 mg/d. Group D (standard regimen) : Teicoplanin was intravenously administered 1-3 times at the loading dose of 400 mg at 12h intervals, followed by maintenance dosing 200 mg/d. The maintenance dosing was adjusted by Cmin and CLcr in all groups. The target Cmin was set to 15~30 mg/L. If Cmin<15 mg/L or >30 mg/L, the maintenance dosage was increased or decreased appropriately up to target Cmin range. CLcr values for male and female were calculated based on the following equations, respectively.
Studientyp
Beobachtungs
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
113
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Probenahmeverfahren
Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe
Studienpopulation
The clinical data of 113 patients who were suffered with severe Gram-positive infection and treated with teicoplanin from February 2015 to August 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- age≥18 years
- duration of teicoplanin therapy≥5 days
- written informed consent was obtained from each patients
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who were allergy to teicoplanin
- pregnant women
- patients with hematopoietic function
- patients unable to evaluate efficacy and safety
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
Kohorten und Interventionen
Gruppe / Kohorte |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Group A
Group A (CLcr≥60mL/min) : Teicoplanin was intravenously administered 3 times for moderate infections (skin, soft tissue and respiratory infections) or 6 times for severe infections(endocarditis caused by MRSA or severe pneumonia) at the loading dose of 400 mg at 12h intervals, followed by maintenance dosing 400 mg/d.
|
If treatment failure for patients in group A，group B，group C and group D，change dose of teicoplanin or other antibacterial agents.
Mechanical ventilation was adopte.Treatment failure was defined as no improvement or worse of clinical symptoms, laboratory data, requiring change of teicoplanin therapy.
|
|
Group B
Group B (40 mL/min≤CLcr<60mL/min) : Teicoplanin was intravenously administered 3 times at the loading dose of 400 mg at 12h intervals, followed by maintenance dosing 400 mg/d.
|
If treatment failure for patients in group A，group B，group C and group D，change dose of teicoplanin or other antibacterial agents.
Mechanical ventilation was adopte.Treatment failure was defined as no improvement or worse of clinical symptoms, laboratory data, requiring change of teicoplanin therapy.
|
|
Group C
Group C (CLcr<40mL/min) : Teicoplanin was intravenously administered 2 times at the loading dose of 400 mg at 12h intervals, followed by maintenance dosing 200 mg/d.
|
If treatment failure for patients in group A，group B，group C and group D，change dose of teicoplanin or other antibacterial agents.
Mechanical ventilation was adopte.Treatment failure was defined as no improvement or worse of clinical symptoms, laboratory data, requiring change of teicoplanin therapy.
|
|
Group D
Group D (standard regimen) : Teicoplanin was intravenously administered 1-3 times at the loading dose of 400 mg at 12h intervals, followed by maintenance dosing 200 mg/d.
|
If treatment failure for patients in group A，group B，group C and group D，change dose of teicoplanin or other antibacterial agents.
Mechanical ventilation was adopte.Treatment failure was defined as no improvement or worse of clinical symptoms, laboratory data, requiring change of teicoplanin therapy.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Serum teicoplanin trough concentrations
Zeitfenster: 0.5 hour before teicoplanin administration on the fourth day
|
Teicoplanin trough samples were taken immediately 30 minutes before teicoplanin administration on the fourth day.
Blood samples for 2-3 mL were collected in blood-collection tubes without any additives and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10min.
Serum teicoplanin trough concentrations (Cmin) were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography method as previously described.
The detections were completed in Translational Medicine Center of Zhengzhou Central Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University.
|
0.5 hour before teicoplanin administration on the fourth day
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
White blood cell count (WBC)
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
It was completed before initiation and after completion of teicoplanin therapy in Zhengzhou city clinical inspection center.
|
2 years
|
|
C-reaction protein (CRP)
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
It was completed before initiation and after completion of teicoplanin therapy in Zhengzhou city clinical inspection center.
|
2 years
|
|
Asparttate aminotransferase (AST)
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
It is an indicator of liver function.It was completed before initiation and after completion of teicoplanin therapy in Zhengzhou city clinical inspection center.
|
2 years
|
|
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
It is an indicator of liver function.It was completed before initiation and after completion of teicoplanin therapy in Zhengzhou city clinical inspection center.
|
2 years
|
|
Serum creatinine (Scr)
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
It is an indicator of renal function.It was completed before initiation and after completion of teicoplanin therapy in Zhengzhou city clinical inspection center.
|
2 years
|
|
CLcr
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
It is an indicator of renal function.It was completed before initiation and after completion of teicoplanin therapy in Zhengzhou city clinical inspection center.
|
2 years
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
1. Februar 2015
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
20. August 2016
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
30. Oktober 2016
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
19. Juli 2017
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
21. Juli 2017
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
25. Juli 2017
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
25. Juli 2017
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
21. Juli 2017
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. Juli 2017
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- LZhou
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
NEIN
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Ja
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .