Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography AI Assisted System Validation on Effectiveness and Safety

20. Januar 2021 aktualisiert von: Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

A Multicentric Validation Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Artificial Intelligence Assisted System in Clinical Application of Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

In this study, the investigators proposed a prospective study about the effectiveness of artificial intelligence system for Retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The subjects would be include in an analyses groups. The AI-assisted system helps endoscopic physicians estimate the difficulty of Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis and make recommendations based on guidelines and difficulty scores. The investigators used the stone removal times, success rate of stone extraction and Operating time to reflect the difficulty of the operation, and evaluated whether the results of the AI system were correct.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Endoscopy is a routine and reliable method for the diagnosis of digestive tract diseases.Common endoscopy are gastroscopy, colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy, ultrasonic gastroscopy, after ercp and other related technology, can be used in early gastric cancer and peptic ulcer, esophageal varices, the stomach before lesion, intestinal polyps and adenomas and colorectal lesions, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreas disease, biliary tract disease diagnosis and follow-up.At present, digestive endoscopy almost covers the diagnosis of the vast majority of diseases of the digestive tract, and diseases of the digestive system that cannot be directly seen by endoscopy can also be realized through endoscopic-based technologies such as endoscopy and ERCP (here the investigators collectively refer to endoscopy), so as to achieve the coverage of the whole digestive system.It can be seen that digestive endoscopy is of great significance for the diagnosis of digestive diseases and the development of digestive field.

With the popularization of these related technologies, the number of endoscopy increased rapidly, which further increased the workload of endoscopists. The operation of endoscopy by high-load endoscopists would reduce the quality of endoscopy, which is prone to problems such as incomplete examination coverage and incomplete detection of lesions.In digestive endoscopy, there are some problems in China, such as lack of endoscopic physicians and uneven distribution, and the quality of endoscopy is not up to standard. These problems need to be solved urgently in order to relieve the pain of patients, save medical resources, save the time and money of patients, and ensure the quality of patients' medical treatment.

In 2015, the proposal of deep learning brought great changes to the field of artificial intelligence, which made the development of artificial intelligence leap to a new level.Computer vision is a science that studies how to make machines "see". Through deep learning, camera and computer can replace human eyes to carry out machine vision such as target recognition, tracking and measurement.Interdisciplinary cooperation in the field of medical imaging and computer vision is also one of the research hotspots in recent years. At present, it is mainly applied to the automatic identification and detection of lesions and quality control, and has achieved good results. It can assist doctors to find lesions, make disease diagnosis and standardize doctors' operations, so as to improve the quality of doctors' operations.With mature technical support, it has a good prospect and application value to develop endoscopic operating system for lesion detection and quality control based on artificial intelligence methods such as deep learning.

In this study, the investigators proposed a prospective study about the effectiveness of artificial intelligence system for Retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The subjects would be include in an analyses groups. The AI-assisted system helps endoscopic physicians estimate the difficulty of Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis and make recommendations based on guidelines and difficulty scores. The investigators used the stone removal times, success rate of stone extraction and Operating time to reflect the difficulty of the operation, and evaluated whether the results of the AI system were correct.

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Voraussichtlich)

150

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430000
        • Renmin Hospital
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Changhai Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200072
        • People'S Hospital

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

Patients who meet the admission criteria for endoscopic examination.

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Who needs ERCP and its related tests are needed to further define the characteristics of digestive tract diseases
  • Able to read, understand and sign informed consent
  • The investigator believes that the subject can understand the process of the clinical study, is willing and able to complete all the study procedures and follow-up visits, and cooperate with the study procedures
  • Patients with a natural duodenal papilla

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has participated in other clinical trials, signed informed consent and is in the follow-up period of other clinical trials
  • Has drug or alcohol abuse or mental disorder in the last 5 years
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • Subjects with previous biliary sphincterotomy
  • The investigator determined that subjects were not suitable for ERCP and related tests
  • A high-risk disease or other special condition that the investigator considers inappropriate for the subject to participate in a clinical trial
  • Patients with known more severe pancreatic head carcinoma
  • Patients with acute pancreatitis within 3 days
  • Biliary stent replacement or removal did not occur after pancreatic angiography as expected
  • Acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Beobachtungsmodelle: Sonstiges
  • Zeitperspektiven: Interessent

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Number of stone removal operations
Zeitfenster: A year
The number of times that the stoning balloon and the stoning net were pulled out of the lumen during the stoning process.
A year

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
the accuracy of the measurement
Zeitfenster: A year
The diameter of the stone (or the width of the lower end of the bile duct) measured by the machine is consistent with the doctor's degree.Accurate DuDu = | machine measurement results - the doctor gold standard measurement results | / doctor gold standard measurements.
A year
Stone clearance success rate
Zeitfenster: A year
Whether the stones have been removed successfully
A year
the sensitivity of the prediction of the stone
Zeitfenster: A year
That is, the sensitivity of the machine to predict the number of stones.Sensitivity = the number of calculi correctly predicted by the machine/the number of actual calculi.
A year
the operate time
Zeitfenster: During surgery
Refers to the time from the successful intubation of the duodenal papilla guide wire to the beginning of endoscopic withdrawal.
During surgery
the removal stone time
Zeitfenster: During surgery
Refers to the time from the successful intubation of the duodenal papilla guide wire to the beginning of endoscopic withdrawal.
During surgery

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Honggang Yu, Doctor, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. September 2020

Primärer Abschluss (Voraussichtlich)

1. Juli 2021

Studienabschluss (Voraussichtlich)

31. Dezember 2021

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

15. Januar 2021

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

20. Januar 2021

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Januar 2021

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Januar 2021

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

20. Januar 2021

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Januar 2021

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • EA-19-006-08

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren