Pilot Study of Active Desk in Primary School : Effects on Cognitive Capacities, Physical Capacities and Well-being (BICLASS)
Pilot Study of Active Desk in Primary School : Effects on the Attention, Cognitive Capacities, Physical Capacities, Concentration and Well-being of Student and on the Classroom Climate
Physical activity (PA) is insufficient in children with three quarters of them who do not meet the WHO's recommendations. Physical inactivity is growing during adolescence; in part due to the time spend in sedentary behaviors at school. The recent literature is highlighting the importance of physical activity on academic achievement, physical fitness and academic achievement in children. In addition, deleterious effects of sedentary behaviors have been demonstrated. At school, many strategies have been settled to break the prolonged sitting time. The use of workstations is one of them and allows to reduce sedentary time at school and increases physical activity without interrupting class. Active workstations like bike desks have demonstrated their effectiveness on physical activity but their effects have not been evaluated in primary school in France. In addition, few studies have evaluated the effects of bike desk use on the child's cognitive abilities.
The main objective of this project is to measure the variations linked to the use of bike desks (desk with pedals) for an average of 1h45mn per week (30min 3 to 4 times per week) for 13 weeks during school time in primary school pupils (aged 8 to 11 years) on the cognitive abilities (mental flexibility, working memory and inhibition) of children.
Our hypothesis is that the use of the bike desk for 1h45 per week will induce an increase in the attention and cognitive capacities (mental flexibility, working memory and inhibition) of the children. Other improvements that should be identified are the child's body composition, the classroom climate and the well-being of pupils and teachers. The children's physical capacities could also be increased, beyond what is expected given the normal evolution during the year.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Two prospective schools have given their prior agreement : Sevigne Lafaye (Vichy) and Pierre Brossolette (Riom). The use of the bike desks in the classroom is part of the school project and will start at the same time as the study. There are 4 bike-desks in each class: 3 for the children and 1 for the teacher. Students pedaling during an overall of 13 weeks (7 weeks and 6 weeks) separated of one evaluation session week (T1). During weeks with evaluation sessions, children will not use bike desk. All children will therefore use the bike desks but only those who have signed the consent form.
An information meeting will be proposed in each school (visit 1). Then, subjects will have a pre-inclusion visit during a medical consultation where the eligibility criteria to participate in this study will be checked (visit 2). The children who have given their consent will have to participate in different evaluation sessions: baseline (T0), between to two pedaling sessions (T1) and at the end of the second session (T2). They are two parts of assessments for each session (T0, T1, T2):
- Cognitive test and the physical activity attraction test (visits 3, 5, 7)
- Body composition and physical capacity assessment (visits 4, 6, 8) Questionnaires will also be part of the assessment (T1 and T2).
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand, Frankreich
- Chu Clermont-Ferrand
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children between 8 and 11 years old (inclusive)
- Girls and boys
- Children enrolled in CM1a and CM1b classes at the Pierre Brossolette school in Riom and in CM1/CM2 and CM2 classes at the Sévigné-Lafaye school in Vichy.
- Able to provide informed consent to research participation
- Registered in the French social security system
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medical or surgical history judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study
- Any unstabilised chronic pathology
- Inability to pedal
- Inability or contraindication to physical activity
- Subjects with cardiorespiratory and/or osteoarticular disorders that limit their ability to perform physical tests or use the cycle desks
- Subjects with a progressive cardiovascular or neoplastic disease.
- Subjects with a major infection in the 3 months prior to inclusion
- Subject with chronic or acute inflammatory disease in the 3 months prior to inclusion
- Subject diagnosed and/or treated for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression
- Person under guardianship, curatorship or not subject to a social security scheme
- Refusal to sign written consent to participate by the participant or a parent or guardian
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: N / A
- Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Bike desks in classroom
All participants receive the same intervention: the use of bike desks during school.
|
Children will use bike desks for 13 weeks during school time
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Students cognitive abilities
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Time to complete the Trail Making Test part A and B (seconds)
|
Week 0
|
|
Students cognitive abilities
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Time to complete the Trail Making Test part A and B (seconds)
|
7 weeks
|
|
Students cognitive abilities
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Time to complete the Trail Making Test part A and B (seconds)
|
13 weeks
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Weight
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Weight (kg) will be assessed by bioimpedance analysis with Tanita MC-780 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan)
|
Week 0
|
|
Body composition (body mass index)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Body mass index (kg/m^2) will be assessed by bioimpedance analysis with Tanita MC-780 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan) by combining weight and height
|
Week 0
|
|
Body composition (body fat mass)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Body fat mass (%) will be assessed by bioimpedance analysis with Tanita MC-780 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan)
|
Week 0
|
|
Weight
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Weight (kg) will be assessed by bioimpedance analysis with Tanita MC-780 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan)
|
7 weeks
|
|
Body composition (body mass index)
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Body mass index (kg/m^2) will be assessed by bioimpedance analysis with Tanita MC-780 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan) by combining weight and height
|
7 weeks
|
|
Body composition (body fat mass)
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Body fat mass (%) will be assessed by bioimpedance analysis with Tanita MC-780 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan)
|
7 weeks
|
|
Weight
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Weight (kg) will be assessed by bioimpedance analysis with Tanita MC-780 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan)
|
13 weeks
|
|
Body composition (body mass index)
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Body mass index (kg/m^2) will be assessed by bioimpedance analysis with Tanita MC-780 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan) by combining weight and height
|
13 weeks
|
|
Body composition (body fat mass)
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Body fat mass (%) will be assessed by bioimpedance analysis with Tanita MC-780 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan)
|
13 weeks
|
|
Physical fitness (cardio-respiratory capacity)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Cardio-respiratory capacity will be assessed with 20 m shuttle test (ml.mn.kg-1)
|
Week 0
|
|
Physical fitness (cardio-respiratory capacity)
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Cardio-respiratory capacity will be assessed with 20 m shuttle test (ml.mn.kg-1)
|
7 weeks
|
|
Physical fitness (cardio-respiratory capacity)
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Cardio-respiratory capacity will be assessed with 20 m shuttle test (ml.mn.kg-1)
|
13 weeks
|
|
Physical fitness (muscular strength)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Muscular strength will be assessed with Standing Broad Jump test (cm), Countermovement Jump test (cm) and Throw Medicine Ball test (cm)
|
Week 0
|
|
Physical fitness (upper limbs muscular strength)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Muscular strength will be assessed with Handgrip test (kg)
|
Week 0
|
|
Physical fitness (muscular strength)
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Muscular strength will be assessed with Standing Broad Jump test (cm), Countermovement Jump test (cm) and Throw Medicine Ball test (cm)
|
7 weeks
|
|
Physical fitness (upper limbs muscular strength)
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Muscular strength will be assessed with Handgrip test (kg)
|
7 weeks
|
|
Physical fitness (muscular strength)
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Muscular strength will be assessed with Standing Broad Jump test (cm), Countermovement Jump test (cm) and Throw Medicine Ball test (cm)
|
13 weeks
|
|
Physical fitness (upper limbs muscular strength)
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Muscular strength will be assessed with Handgrip test (kg)
|
13 weeks
|
|
Physical fitness (motor skills)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Motor skills will be assessed with the time to complete an obstacle course (seconds)
|
Week 0
|
|
Physical fitness (motor skills)
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Motor skills will be assessed with the time to complete an obstacle course (seconds)
|
7 weeks
|
|
Physical fitness (motor skills)
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Motor skills will be assessed with the time to complete an obstacle course (seconds)
|
13 weeks
|
|
Implicit and explicit attraction to physical activity
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Implicit and explicit attraction to physical activity will be assessed with Activity Preference Assessment (APA) computer test
|
Week 0
|
|
Implicit and explicit attraction to physical activity
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Implicit and explicit attraction to physical activity will be assessed with Activity Preference Assessment (APA) computer test
|
7 weeks
|
|
Implicit and explicit attraction to physical activity
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Implicit and explicit attraction to physical activity will be assessed with Activity Preference Assessment (APA) computer test
|
13 weeks
|
|
Teachers' perceptions of students' well-being
Zeitfenster: Week 0
|
Questionnaire created by the National Education.
Items will be rated from 1 to 5: 1 unsatisfactory; 2 marginally satisfactory; 3 neutral; 4 satisfactory; 5 very satisfactory.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
Week 0
|
|
Teachers' perceptions of students' well-being
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Questionnaire created by the National Education.
Items will be rated from 1 to 5: 1 unsatisfactory; 2 marginally satisfactory; 3 neutral; 4 satisfactory; 5 very satisfactory.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
7 weeks
|
|
Teachers' perceptions of students' well-being
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Questionnaire created by the National Education.
Items will be rated from 1 to 5: 1 unsatisfactory; 2 marginally satisfactory; 3 neutral; 4 satisfactory; 5 very satisfactory.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
13 weeks
|
|
Students and teachers' perceived well-being
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Questionnaire created by the National Education.
Items will be rated with smiley or rating from 1 to 5: 1 unsatisfactory; 2 marginally satisfactory; 3 neutral; 4 satisfactory; 5 very satisfactory.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
7 weeks
|
|
Students and teachers' perceived well-being
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Questionnaire created by the National Education.
Items will be rated with smiley or rating from 1 to 5: 1 unsatisfactory; 2 marginally satisfactory; 3 neutral; 4 satisfactory; 5 very satisfactory.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
13 weeks
|
|
Classroom climate/atmosphere
Zeitfenster: 7 weeks
|
Questionnaire created by the National Education.
Items will be rated from 1 to 5: 1 unsatisfactory; 2 marginally satisfactory; 3 neutral; 4 satisfactory; 5 very satisfactory.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
7 weeks
|
|
Classroom climate/atmosphere
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Questionnaire created by the National Education.
Items will be rated from 1 to 5: 1 unsatisfactory; 2 marginally satisfactory; 3 neutral; 4 satisfactory; 5 very satisfactory.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
13 weeks
|
|
Possible factors of failure of the strategy
Zeitfenster: 13 weeks
|
Questionnaire: socioeconomical level of parents, reason for refusal to participate , parents feeling, students feeling, teachers feeling.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
13 weeks
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Mitarbeiter
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- RBHP 2021 DUCLOS
- 2021-A00114-37 (Andere Kennung: 2021-A00114-37)
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .