Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

REstoration of SYNChronous Cardiac Function Due to Physiologic cArdiac Pacing Modalities With Clinical Endpoints (RESYNC-PACE)

8. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Peter Ezer, University of Pecs

REstoration of SYNChronous Cardiac Function Due to Physiologic cArdiac Pacing Modalities With Clinical Endpoints RESYNC-PACE

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of physiologic cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using conduction system pacing strategies compared with conventional biventricular CRT in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and electrical dyssynchrony.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does physiologic CRT (including left bundle branch area pacing [LBBAP] and LBBAP-optimized CRT) reduce the combined risk of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization compared with conventional biventricular CRT?
  • Does physiologic CRT improve cardiac function and reverse ventricular remodeling more effectively than conventional CRT?

Participants receiving physiologic CRT as part of routine clinical care will undergo standard follow-up evaluations, including electrocardiography, echocardiography, laboratory testing, and device interrogation. Clinical outcomes will be collected prospectively for 24 months and compared with a historical cohort of patients treated with conventional biventricular CRT.

The study will assess clinical outcomes, echocardiographic response, electrical resynchronization parameters, and device-related safety in a real-world heart failure population.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Background

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization despite continuous advances in guideline-directed medical therapy. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become an established treatment for patients with symptomatic HFrEF and electrical dyssynchrony. Conventional biventricular pacing improves ventricular synchrony and clinical outcomes; however, approximately one-third of treated patients do not achieve a satisfactory response.

Conduction system pacing (CSP), particularly left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), has emerged as a physiological pacing strategy capable of directly engaging the native His-Purkinje conduction system. Compared with conventional biventricular pacing, CSP may produce more physiological ventricular activation, narrower paced QRS complexes, improved electrical synchrony, and greater reverse ventricular remodeling. Nevertheless, evidence regarding its long-term effectiveness in routine clinical practice remains limited, particularly in heterogeneous populations with different conduction abnormalities.

Study Rationale

The RESYNC-PACE study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of individualized physiologic cardiac resynchronization strategies in a real-world population of patients with HFrEF requiring CRT.

The study investigates two complementary physiologic CRT approaches according to the underlying conduction disturbance. In patients with typical left bundle branch block (LBBB), left ventricular lead implantation is guided by the qLV ratio to achieve optimal electrical resynchronization through individualized coronary sinus lead positioning. In patients with intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), a conduction system pacing strategy is applied using left bundle branch area pacing. When conduction system pacing alone results in incomplete electrical correction, defined by a paced QRS duration greater than 130 ms, an additional coronary sinus left ventricular lead is implanted to establish Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (LOT-CRT).

This individualized treatment algorithm reflects contemporary physiological concepts of ventricular resynchronization rather than a single implantation strategy and represents the principal scientific concept investigated in the study.

Scientific Objectives

The study aims to determine whether physiologic CRT strategies provide superior long-term clinical outcomes compared with conventional biventricular CRT when implemented in routine clinical practice.

In addition to evaluating clinical outcomes, the study investigates the relationship between electrical resynchronization, ventricular reverse remodeling, myocardial scar characteristics assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and long-term prognosis. Particular emphasis is placed on identifying imaging-, electrocardiographic-, and device-derived predictors of CRT response that may facilitate patient selection and optimization of resynchronization therapy.

Study Methodology

RESYNC-PACE is a single-center, ambispective observational cohort study performed at the University of Pécs Clinical Centre Heart Institute. Consecutive patients undergoing physiologic CRT constitute the prospective cohort, while a historical cohort of patients treated with conventional biventricular CRT serves as the comparator.

All therapeutic procedures are performed as part of routine clinical care using commercially available CE-marked cardiac implantable electronic devices according to their approved indications and current international guideline recommendations. The study does not introduce experimental devices or procedures beyond standard clinical practice but prospectively evaluates the clinical performance of an individualized physiological CRT algorithm.

The comprehensive study database integrates demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, procedural, device-derived, and long-term follow-up data. This integrated approach enables detailed evaluation of the mechanisms underlying CRT response and supports the development of patient-specific resynchronization strategies.

Expected Clinical Significance

The RESYNC-PACE study is expected to generate real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness of conduction system pacing-guided CRT strategies and individualized resynchronization algorithms. The findings may improve patient selection, optimize implantation strategies for different conduction disorders, and contribute to the growing evidence supporting physiologic cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

50

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

  • Name: Peter Ezer MD PhD, assistant professor
  • Telefonnummer: +36305468840
  • E-Mail: ezerpeti@gmail.com

Studienorte

    • Baranya
      • Pécs, Baranya, Ungarn, 7621
        • Heart Institute , University of Pécs

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

The study population consists of adult patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are treated at the University of Pécs Clinical Centre Heart Institute and meet contemporary guideline indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Eligible participants have symptomatic heart failure despite guideline-directed medical therapy, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and evidence of electrical dyssynchrony manifested by left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). The prospective cohort includes patients undergoing conduction system pacing-based CRT as part of routine clinical care, while the historical control cohort includes patients previously treated with conventional biventricular CRT at the same institution. The study population represents a real-world heart failure population routinely referred for CRT implantation in tertiary cardiovascular care.

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Symptomatic heart failure despite guideline-directed medical therapy.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%.
  • Indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy according to contemporary ESC guideline recommendations.
  • QRS duration ≥150 ms with either:

Left bundle branch block (LBBB), or Intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD).

  • Planned implantation of a CRT system
  • Ability to provide written informed consent
  • Expected survival greater than 24 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years and Age 100 < years
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
  • Life expectancy <12 months due to non-cardiac comorbidities.
  • Active systemic infection or infection involving a cardiac implantable electronic device.
  • Reversible causes of heart failure expected to improve without CRT.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that may affect study outcomes.
  • Inability to comply with follow-up requirements.
  • Missing essential baseline or follow-up data (retrospective cohort).
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, would make participation inappropriate or interfere with study assessments.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

Kohorten und Interventionen

Gruppe / Kohorte
Intervention / Behandlung
Left bundle branch block patients

LBBB Cohort (qLV-guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)

Patients in this cohort have symptomatic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) according to contemporary guideline criteria. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is performed using a personalized implantation strategy guided by the qLV ratio, defined as the interval between QRS onset and local left ventricular activation divided by the intrinsic QRS duration. The left ventricular lead is positioned at the site with the longest achievable electrical delay to maximize resynchronization benefit. Patients receive either conventional biventricular CRT or LOT- CRT according to clinical decision-making and anatomical feasibility. The cohort is followed longitudinally to evaluate the relationship between qLV-guided lead placement, electrical resynchronization, reverse ventricular remodeling, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause mortality.

Conduction System Pacing-Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy is an individualized resynchronization strategy used in patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and electrical dyssynchrony. The intervention is based on direct recruitment of the native cardiac conduction system through left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). During implantation, electrical resynchronization is assessed using electrocardiographic and device-derived parameters. In patients with intraventricular conduction delay or incomplete electrical correction, additional left ventricular pacing may be provided using a coronary sinus lead, resulting in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (LOT-CRT). The intervention aims to achieve more physiological ventricular activation than conventional biventricular pacing, improve electrical synchrony, promote reverse ventricular remodeling, and reduce heart failure-related adverse events.
Andere Namen:
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy using left bundle branch area pacing with or without LV lead optimization.
  • Cardiac resynchronization guided by conduction system pacing to improve ventricular synchrony.
Intraventricular conduction delay patients

IVCD Cohort (Conduction System Pacing-Guided Resynchronization Strategy)

Patients in this cohort have symptomatic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) without typical left bundle branch block morphology. The resynchronization strategy is guided by the degree of electrical correction achieved with conduction system pacing. During implantation, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is attempted and paced QRS duration is assessed. If conduction system pacing alone results in a paced QRS duration greater than 130 ms, a Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (LOT-CRT) system is implanted by adding a left ventricular lead to further improve ventricular synchrony. The cohort is followed longitudinally to evaluate the association between electrical resynchronization, reverse ventricular remodeling, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause mortality.

Conduction System Pacing-Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy is an individualized resynchronization strategy used in patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and electrical dyssynchrony. The intervention is based on direct recruitment of the native cardiac conduction system through left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). During implantation, electrical resynchronization is assessed using electrocardiographic and device-derived parameters. In patients with intraventricular conduction delay or incomplete electrical correction, additional left ventricular pacing may be provided using a coronary sinus lead, resulting in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (LOT-CRT). The intervention aims to achieve more physiological ventricular activation than conventional biventricular pacing, improve electrical synchrony, promote reverse ventricular remodeling, and reduce heart failure-related adverse events.
Andere Namen:
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy using left bundle branch area pacing with or without LV lead optimization.
  • Cardiac resynchronization guided by conduction system pacing to improve ventricular synchrony.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Composite of All-Cause Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization
Zeitfenster: 24 months
Time to first occurrence of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization due to worsening heart failure during the 24-month follow-up period.
24 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 24 months

Change in left ventricular ejection fraction measured by transthoracic echocardiography between baseline and 24-month follow-up.

Ejection fraction is measured in percentage (%). Improvement in ejection fraction is detected as increase in percentage-value.

Baseline to 24 months
Change in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume ( LV ESV)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 24 months

Change in left ventricular end-systolic volumen measured by echocardiography between baseline and 24-month follow-up.

Left ventricular end-systolic volume in measured in mililiters ( ml) , decrease in LV ESV is a sign of clinical response on therapy.

Baseline to 24 months
Change in paced QRS Duration
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 24 months

Reduction in QRS duration following cardiac resynchronization therapy compared with baseline electrocardiographic measurements.

Paced QRS duration is measured in miliseconds (ms). Decrease in paced QRS duration compared to preoperative QRS duration is marked as a good signal in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Baseline to 24 months
New York Heart Association Heart Failure Functional Status
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 24 months

Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class from baseline to follow-up. Stage I-IV.

NYHA improvement is detected as decrease in NYHA stage grade.

Baseline to 24 months

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Device-Related and Procedure-Related Complications
Zeitfenster: 24 months
Incidence of device-related and procedure-related adverse events, including lead dislodgement, infection, pneumothorax, pocket hematoma, and system revision.
24 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

29. Juni 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

29. Juni 2030

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

29. Juni 2031

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

28. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

28. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

6. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

10. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

8. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • FF107 RESYNC-PACE ver1.0
  • Biotronik Research Grant FF107 (Andere Zuschuss-/Finanzierungsnummer: BIOTRONIK SE & Co. KG Woermannkehre 1 12359 Berlin)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

ndividual participant data will be shared only in a de-identified form and in accordance with applicable data protection regulations, institutional policies, and informed consent provisions. Data sharing may be limited where participant privacy, ethical considerations, or legal requirements prevent full disclosure of individual-level data.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Ja

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Stimulation des linken Schenkelbereichs

3
Abonnieren