Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Early Loading of UV-Functionalized Dental Implants

3. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Damascus University

Effect of Early Loading on Ultraviolet Photofunctionalized Dental Implants: A Randomized Controlled Triple-Blind Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

This randomized controlled triple-blind split-mouth clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of early loading on ultraviolet photofunctionalized dental implants placed in the posterior mandible. Ten patients received a total of 20 implants, with each participant receiving one ultraviolet photofunctionalized implant and one non-photofunctionalized control implant. Ultraviolet photofunctionalization was performed 24 hours before implant placement by an independent investigator. All implants were early loaded 4 weeks after surgery. Implant stability was assessed using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) and expressed as Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values at implant placement, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks after surgery. Peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated radiographically during a one-year follow-up period. The study compared implant stability and radiographic outcomes between ultraviolet photofunctionalized and conventional implants under early loading conditions.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Dental implants have become a predictable and widely accepted treatment modality for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous patients.

Successful implant therapy depends largely on achieving and maintaining osseointegration between the implant surface and the surrounding bone. Traditionally, implants were left unloaded for several months to allow sufficient healing and osseointegration before functional loading. However, the growing demand for shorter treatment times has encouraged the development of early loading protocols. Early loading of dental implants offers several clinical advantages, including reduced treatment duration, earlier restoration of function and esthetics, and improved patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, successful early loading requires adequate implant stability during the critical healing period. Consequently, considerable research has focused on improving implant surface characteristics to accelerate osseointegration and enhance implant stability. Ultraviolet (UV) photofunctionalization is a surface modification technique that involves exposing titanium implants to ultraviolet light before placement. This process reduces hydrocarbon contamination on the implant surface, increases surface hydrophilicity, and enhances the biological activity of titanium. Previous experimental and clinical studies have suggested that UV photofunctionalization may improve cell attachment, promote bone formation, increase bone-to-implant contact, and enhance implant stability during the early stages of healing. This randomized controlled triple-blind split-mouth clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of early loading on ultraviolet photofunctionalized dental implants placed in the posterior mandible. Ten patients requiring bilateral implant-supported rehabilitation in comparable posterior mandibular sites were included. A total of twenty implants were placed, with each participant receiving one ultraviolet photofunctionalized implant and one non photofunctionalized control implant. Implant allocation was randomized, and ultraviolet photofunctionalization was performed by an independent investigator 24 hours before surgery. Participants, the surgeon/outcome assessor, and the statistician were blinded to treatment allocation throughout the study. All implants were restored using an early loading protocol four weeks after implant placement. Implant stability was evaluated using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) and expressed as Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values. Measurements were obtained at implant placement, three weeks after surgery, and four weeks after surgery. In addition, peri-implant marginal bone loss was assessed radiographically during a one-year follow-up period. The split-mouth design was selected to minimize inter-individual variability and allow direct comparison between test and control implants within the same participant. The study aimed to determine whether ultraviolet photofunctionalization could improve implant stability and support the clinical performance of early-loaded dental implants in the posterior mandible.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

10

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Damascus, Syrien
        • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry Damascus University Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent, with commitment to follow-up visits and study instructions.
  2. Good oral hygiene and satisfactory oral health status.
  3. Adults aged 18 years or older.
  4. Good general health with no systemic conditions contraindicating dental implant placement.
  5. Requirement for dental implant placement in the posterior mandible, with at least 6 months elapsed since tooth extraction.
  6. Adequate bone volume to allow implant placement without the need for bone grafting procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with parafunctional habits, including bruxism.
  2. Heavy smokers consuming more than 10 cigarettes per day.
  3. Patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
  4. Long-term use of medications known to affect bone metabolism, such as corticosteroids.
  5. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  6. Insufficient interocclusal space for prosthetic rehabilitation.
  7. Patients with metabolic or bone disorders affecting bone quality or density, including hyperparathyroidism and osteoporosis.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Vervierfachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Arm 1: Ultraviolet Photofunctionalized Dental Implants
This arm included dental implants that underwent ultraviolet photofunctionalization 24 hours before implant placement. Each participant received one ultraviolet photofunctionalized implant in a posterior mandibular edentulous site according to the randomized split-mouth design.
Dental implants assigned to the experimental arm underwent ultraviolet photofunctionalization 24 hours before implant placement by an independent investigator. The implants were subsequently placed in posterior mandibular edentulous sites and restored using an early loading protocol 4 weeks after surgery
Aktiver Komparator: Conventional Dental Implants
This arm included dental implants placed without ultraviolet photofunctionalization. Each participant received one conventional implant in a comparable posterior mandibular edentulous site according to the randomized split-mouth design.
Dental implants assigned to the control arm were placed without ultraviolet photofunctionalization. The implants were inserted in comparable posterior mandibular edentulous sites and restored using the same early loading protocol 4 weeks after surgery

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ)
Zeitfenster: At implant placement (baseline), 3 weeks after implant placement, and 4 weeks after implant placement.
Implant stability was measured using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) with the Mega ISQ II device. Stability values were recorded as Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) scores ranging from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater implant stability. Measurements were obtained immediately after implant placement, at 3 weeks, and at 4 weeks postoperatively before early loading.
At implant placement (baseline), 3 weeks after implant placement, and 4 weeks after implant placement.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Peri-implant Marginal Bone Loss
Zeitfenster: At implant placement (baseline) and one year after early loading.
Peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated using standardized periapical radiographs obtained immediately after implant placement and one year after early loading. Measurements were performed by assessing the vertical distance from the implant platform to the first bone-to-implant contact on both mesial and distal aspects of the implant. Bone level changes were calculated and recorded in millimeters (mm), with greater values indicating increased marginal bone loss
At implant placement (baseline) and one year after early loading.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Studienstuhl: Issam Alkhouri, DDS, Phd, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
  • Hauptermittler: Awab Al-Midani, Master's Degree Candidate, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

11. Dezember 2022

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

8. Februar 2025

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

8. März 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

3. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

3. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

10. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

10. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

3. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • UDDS-2026-OralMaxillofacial-02

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren