Implementation of Evidence-based Guidelines for Assessment and Counseling of Patients With Neck and Back Pain in Health Care Centers (ALIGN)
The overall aim is to investigate the health outcomes and consequences, from an individual and a societal perspective, of adding licensed Manual Therapists as first-contact healthcare providers in Primary Health Care centers to triage (not treat) patients seeking care for Neck and Back Pain.
A hybrid, quasi-experimental Target Trial Emulation design employing mixed methods contextualized to participating Primary Health Care centers will be used.
Neck and Back Pain patients with a physician's appointment at a participating Primary Health Care center will be included and followed one year;
- 300 patients with care as usual who see their physician (control group),
- 300 patients who see a licensed naprapath/chiropractor for an initial evidence-based assessment/screening before the physicians' visit.
Patient outcomes include recovery, function and work ability, as well as health economy are compared between the groups.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Many visits to primary healthcare centers (PHCs) concern neck and/or back pain (NBP). Evidence-based clinical guidelines are often not considered, and low-value care, including unnecessary imaging, prescription of medications, injections, unnecessary surgery, and sick leave, is instead used, leading to poor patient outcomes and high societal costs. The primary healthcare system is severely pressured, and there is a need to reduce the burden of this common patient group on the physicians. Licensed naprapaths and chiropractors (manual therapist (MT)) have been part of Swedish healthcare for >30 years, but their competence is seldom utilized at PHCs. MT as first-contact providers within PHCs may reduce the burden of NBP in the population by improving adherence to evidence-based guidelines, reducing the workload on physicians, minimizing unnecessary healthcare procedures, and reducing expenditure.
Patient reported outcomes include pain, function, work ability and satisfaction, and health economy are based on sickness absence, care consumption, referrals and pharmaceutical use will be compared between groups.
Our hypothesis is that the intervention will lead to symptom improvement and work ability, as well as decrease the risk of sickness absence and low value care (sickness absence, care consumption, referrals and pharmaceutical use) for these patients. Thus, we hypothesize positive consequences for the individual and for society.
Advanced epidemiological/statistical methods address confounding when comparing the groups. Physicians' and patients' experiences, facilitators, and barriers to the implementation of the intervention will also be studied.
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: Iben Axén, PhD
- Telefonnummer: +46 70 44 00 618
- E-Mail: iben.axen@ki.se
Studienorte
-
-
-
Stockholm, Schweden
- Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm 171 77 Solna
-
Kontakt:
- Iben Axén, PhD
- Telefonnummer: +46 70 44 00 618
- E-Mail: iben.axen@ki.se
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients 18-70 years, with an appointment with a physician at the primary health care center for a new episode of pain or discomfort in the neck, mid-back or lower back with or without radiating symptoms to the head, arms, or leg
Exclusion Criteria:
- Sick-leave for neck- and backpain the preceding three months (at least 50%), having consulted or been treated by licensed healthcare provider for neck- and backpain during the preceding three months, and not mastering the Swedish language
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
- Zuteilung: N / A
- Interventionsmodell: Sequenzielle Zuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: MT management
The intervention in the index group is a triage performed by the licensed manual therapist, MT: take the anamnesis, perform a clinical assessment and examination (including assessment of fear/avoidance, pain catastrophizing, and expectations), provide a diagnosis, and give the patient recommendations according to evidence-based clinical guidelines, i.e., high-value care.
In summary, these guidelines state that patients with no "Red flags" (signs of pathology) or "Yellow flags" (psychological risk factors such as unrealistic beliefs about their pain, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia) shall self-manage when they are adequately informed about their condition and that they need to continue with their usual activities, such as work, physical activity, and social life.
The role of the MT is to triage patients according to the best evidence into three groups: those with little or no risk of persistent pain, those with a moderate risk, and those with a substantial risk of a bad prognosis.
|
The intervention in the index group is a triage performed by the licensed manual teerapeut: take the anamnesis, perform a clinical and assessment formula examination (fear/avoidance, pain catastrophizing, and expectations), provide a diagnosis, and give the patient recommendations according to current evidence-based clinical guidelines.
The outcome in this intervention arm will be compared to study participants with "care as usal" included in sthe study earlier.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-perceived Global Perceived Effect
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
This outcome is measured through a Lickert scale.
The single question is: "compared with the start of the trial, how is your [condition] today?"
Answers from "completely recovered" to "much worse"
|
12 months
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Chronic pain
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
|
Activity limitations
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
Roland Morris disability questionnaire, Nordic pain questionnaire.
These are validated instruments assessing the influence of the condition on everyday activities.
Example "my [condition] prevents me from doing household chores" -agree/do not agree.
The instrument then results in a score where high scores mean that the condition highly affects daily activities.
|
12 months
|
|
Health-related quality of life
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
EuorQol-5 dimensions is a validated questionnaire that results in a score between 0 and 1(perfect health).
|
12 months
|
|
Societal costs
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
Cost related to care consumption, sick-leave, referrals and pharmaceuticals.
Self-reported every three months, participants are reporting all care relating to their condition, number of care visits and cost of visits.
Travel time is attributed to each care visit.
This will also include visits to specialists.
They are reporting the number of days they have been off work due to the condition, and all type of medication consumed for their condition.
|
12 months
|
|
Work Ability
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
Measures the balance between a person's individual resources (such as health, skills, and mental energy) and the actual demands of their job
|
12 months
|
|
sickness absence
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
The number of days an individual has been off work because of neck and back pain
|
12 months
|
Andere Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of the assessment by manual therapists
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
A qualitative outcome collected in interviews with healthcare personell and patients
|
12 months
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Mitarbeiter
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, Ferreira PH, Fritz JM, Koes BW, Peul W, Turner JA, Maher CG; Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2368-2383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
- Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, Traeger AC, Lin CC, Chenot JF, van Tulder M, Koes BW. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2791-2803. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
- GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
- Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
- Bornhoft L, Thorn J, Svensson M, Nordeman L, Eggertsen R, Larsson MEH. More cost-effective management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders in primary care after direct triaging to physiotherapists for initial assessment compared to initial general practitioner assessment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 1;20(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2553-9.
- Slade SC, Kent P, Patel S, Bucknall T, Buchbinder R. Barriers to Primary Care Clinician Adherence to Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies. Clin J Pain. 2016 Sep;32(9):800-16. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000324.
- Egerton T, Diamond LE, Buchbinder R, Bennell KL, Slade SC. A systematic review and evidence synthesis of qualitative studies to identify primary care clinicians' barriers and enablers to the management of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 May;25(5):625-638. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
- Wiitavaara B, Fahlstrom M, Djupsjobacka M. Prevalence, diagnostics and management of musculoskeletal disorders in primary health care in Sweden - an investigation of 2000 randomly selected patient records. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):325-332. doi: 10.1111/jep.12614. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
- Hallberg S, Rolfson O, Karppinen J, Schiottz-Christensen B, Stubhaug A, Rivano Fischer M, Gerdle B, Toresson Grip E, Gustavsson A, Robinson RL, Varenhorst C, Schepman P. Burden of disease and management of osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: healthcare utilization and sick leave in Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark (BISCUITS): study design and patient characteristics of a real world data study. Scand J Pain. 2022 Jul 20;23(1):126-138. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0212. Print 2023 Jan 27.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- KIIMMIIB
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .