Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comparative Effectiveness Research for Eliminating Disparities (CERED)

2 de junio de 2016 actualizado por: Margarita Alegria, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

UPR-CHA Research Center of Excellence- Supplement

Our study tested the effectiveness of a combined cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and care manager intervention offered either by telephone or face-to-face with depressed Latinos identified in primary care. Eligible patients were randomized after baseline to one of three conditions; 1) ECLA-T (telephone) intervention, 2) ECLA-F (face to face) intervention, and 3) usual care. Usual care was considered care as usual in the participating clinic for a patient screening or depression. The ECLA-T intervention was based on a telephone-plus-care-management intervention that has been shown to be effective in decreasing depressive symptoms and increasing client satisfaction and self-perceived global improvement, as compared to usual care in depressed patients in primary care settings.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Our study tested the effectiveness of a combined cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and care manager intervention offered either by telephone or face-to-face with depressed Latinos identified in primary care. The study was conducted at two sites (San Juan, PR and Boston, MA), each of which had multiple clinics. Eligible patients were randomized after baseline to one of three conditions; 1) ECLA-T (telephone) intervention, 2) ECLA-F (face to face) intervention, and 3) usual care. Usual care was considered care as usual in the participating clinic for a patient screening or depression. The ECLA-T intervention was based on a telephone-plus-care-management intervention that has been shown to be effective in decreasing depressive symptoms and increasing client satisfaction and self-perceived global improvement, as compared to usual care in depressed patients in primary care settings.

All participants received a baseline interview assessment prior to randomization. After treatment completion (2 to 3 months from baseline), patients completed an end-of-treatment (EOT) assessment, including repeated assessment of baseline measurements. A 4-month follow-up from baseline was scheduled, which replicated the EOT assessment.

For those patients in the intervention conditions, during each session the clinician used CBT and motivational enhancement strategies to engage the patient in treatment and enhance retention. The CBT intervention was composed of a shortened version of the original CBT intervention, comprised of modules that focus on identifying and correcting negative distortions or cognitions, promote behavioral activation through engaging the patient in pleasant activities, and develop supportive relationships. All sessions were tailored within the structured format considering the patient's needs and always employed a collaborative approach with the patient.

The first four sessions occurred weekly. Every other week the clinician evaluated the patient with the PHQ-9 to determine the level of depressive symptoms. After four sessions, if there was improvement two to four more bi-weekly sessions were scheduled. If there was no or minimal improvement, sessions continued weekly up to a total of 8 sessions for a maximum of 3 months treatment. Cases that showed no improvement or deterioration received more intensive monitoring from the supervising clinicians at both sites.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

257

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Massachusetts
      • Somerville, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02134
        • Cambridge Health Alliance
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00936
        • University of Puerto Rico

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are eligible if they are Latinos, at least 18 years of age, score 10 or more on the PHQ-9 and meet at least one of the essential criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria include history of psychosis, use of any specialty mental health treatment within the 3 months prior to baseline or an appointment with a mental health provider within the next two months, inability to demonstrate capacity to consent or evidence of suicidal thoughts or ideation as measured by an affirmative response to questions 4 and 5 on the Paykel Suicide Questionnaire).

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Engagement and Counseling for Latinos (ECLA-F)
Patients in this arm (ECLA-F) receive the 6-8 session CBT plus care-management intervention, administered in person.
The Engagement and Counseling for Latinos - Face-to-face (ECLA-F) intervention is a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) plus care-management intervention delivered in person. The CBT component consists of 6-8 sessions, delivered by a Master's level clinician, and focusing on self-management techniques, problem-solving, and techniques for managing depression and stress. The care-management component of the intervention consisted of monitoring, assistance in scheduling appointments, and help with transportation. This intervention was identical to the telephone (ECLA-F) intervention, except for the delivery method.
Comparador activo: Engagement and Counseling for Latinos (ECLA-T)
Patients in this arm received the 6-8 session CBT intervention via telephone.
The Engagement and Counseling for Latinos - Telephone (ECLA-T) intervention is a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) plus care-management intervention delivered via telephone. The CBT component consists of 6-8 sessions, delivered by a Master's level clinician, and focusing on self-management techniques, problem-solving, and techniques for managing depression and stress. The care-management component of the intervention consisted of monitoring, assistance in scheduling appointments, and technical assistance. This intervention was identical to the face-to-face (ECLA-F) intervention, except for the delivery method.
Sin intervención: Usual Care
Patients in this arm receive usual care for depression from their primary care providers, which could include antidepressant prescription or referral to specialty mental health care.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Depression Severity at baseline, end of treatment (2-3 months), and 6-month follow-up
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, At each intervention visit (approximately weekly up to end of treatment at 2-3 months), and at 6-month follow-up
Change in severity of depression symptoms will be assessed using two different measures. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a nine item depression screening tool, developed and validated for use in primary care settings. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20 (HSCL-20) measures depression symptom severity and distress.
Baseline, At each intervention visit (approximately weekly up to end of treatment at 2-3 months), and at 6-month follow-up

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Past 30-day Functioning at baseline, end of treatment (2-3 months), and 6-month follow-up
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, At each intervention visit (approximately weekly up to end of treatment at 2-3 months), and at 6-month follow-up
Overall functioning over the past 30 days was measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS 2.0).
Baseline, At each intervention visit (approximately weekly up to end of treatment at 2-3 months), and at 6-month follow-up

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Margarita Alegria, Ph.D., Cambridge Health Alliance
  • Investigador principal: Glorisa Canino, Ph.D., University of Puerto Rico

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Enlaces Útiles

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de mayo de 2011

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2012

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2012

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

18 de diciembre de 2013

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de enero de 2014

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

6 de enero de 2014

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

3 de junio de 2016

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de junio de 2016

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • CHA-IRB-0465/08/10
  • 3P60MD002261 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir