Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Comparative Effectiveness Research for Eliminating Disparities (CERED)

2 juin 2016 mis à jour par: Margarita Alegria, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

UPR-CHA Research Center of Excellence- Supplement

Our study tested the effectiveness of a combined cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and care manager intervention offered either by telephone or face-to-face with depressed Latinos identified in primary care. Eligible patients were randomized after baseline to one of three conditions; 1) ECLA-T (telephone) intervention, 2) ECLA-F (face to face) intervention, and 3) usual care. Usual care was considered care as usual in the participating clinic for a patient screening or depression. The ECLA-T intervention was based on a telephone-plus-care-management intervention that has been shown to be effective in decreasing depressive symptoms and increasing client satisfaction and self-perceived global improvement, as compared to usual care in depressed patients in primary care settings.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Our study tested the effectiveness of a combined cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and care manager intervention offered either by telephone or face-to-face with depressed Latinos identified in primary care. The study was conducted at two sites (San Juan, PR and Boston, MA), each of which had multiple clinics. Eligible patients were randomized after baseline to one of three conditions; 1) ECLA-T (telephone) intervention, 2) ECLA-F (face to face) intervention, and 3) usual care. Usual care was considered care as usual in the participating clinic for a patient screening or depression. The ECLA-T intervention was based on a telephone-plus-care-management intervention that has been shown to be effective in decreasing depressive symptoms and increasing client satisfaction and self-perceived global improvement, as compared to usual care in depressed patients in primary care settings.

All participants received a baseline interview assessment prior to randomization. After treatment completion (2 to 3 months from baseline), patients completed an end-of-treatment (EOT) assessment, including repeated assessment of baseline measurements. A 4-month follow-up from baseline was scheduled, which replicated the EOT assessment.

For those patients in the intervention conditions, during each session the clinician used CBT and motivational enhancement strategies to engage the patient in treatment and enhance retention. The CBT intervention was composed of a shortened version of the original CBT intervention, comprised of modules that focus on identifying and correcting negative distortions or cognitions, promote behavioral activation through engaging the patient in pleasant activities, and develop supportive relationships. All sessions were tailored within the structured format considering the patient's needs and always employed a collaborative approach with the patient.

The first four sessions occurred weekly. Every other week the clinician evaluated the patient with the PHQ-9 to determine the level of depressive symptoms. After four sessions, if there was improvement two to four more bi-weekly sessions were scheduled. If there was no or minimal improvement, sessions continued weekly up to a total of 8 sessions for a maximum of 3 months treatment. Cases that showed no improvement or deterioration received more intensive monitoring from the supervising clinicians at both sites.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

257

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • San Juan, Porto Rico, 00936
        • University of Puerto Rico
    • Massachusetts
      • Somerville, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02134
        • Cambridge Health Alliance

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are eligible if they are Latinos, at least 18 years of age, score 10 or more on the PHQ-9 and meet at least one of the essential criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria include history of psychosis, use of any specialty mental health treatment within the 3 months prior to baseline or an appointment with a mental health provider within the next two months, inability to demonstrate capacity to consent or evidence of suicidal thoughts or ideation as measured by an affirmative response to questions 4 and 5 on the Paykel Suicide Questionnaire).

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Engagement and Counseling for Latinos (ECLA-F)
Patients in this arm (ECLA-F) receive the 6-8 session CBT plus care-management intervention, administered in person.
The Engagement and Counseling for Latinos - Face-to-face (ECLA-F) intervention is a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) plus care-management intervention delivered in person. The CBT component consists of 6-8 sessions, delivered by a Master's level clinician, and focusing on self-management techniques, problem-solving, and techniques for managing depression and stress. The care-management component of the intervention consisted of monitoring, assistance in scheduling appointments, and help with transportation. This intervention was identical to the telephone (ECLA-F) intervention, except for the delivery method.
Comparateur actif: Engagement and Counseling for Latinos (ECLA-T)
Patients in this arm received the 6-8 session CBT intervention via telephone.
The Engagement and Counseling for Latinos - Telephone (ECLA-T) intervention is a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) plus care-management intervention delivered via telephone. The CBT component consists of 6-8 sessions, delivered by a Master's level clinician, and focusing on self-management techniques, problem-solving, and techniques for managing depression and stress. The care-management component of the intervention consisted of monitoring, assistance in scheduling appointments, and technical assistance. This intervention was identical to the face-to-face (ECLA-F) intervention, except for the delivery method.
Aucune intervention: Usual Care
Patients in this arm receive usual care for depression from their primary care providers, which could include antidepressant prescription or referral to specialty mental health care.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Depression Severity at baseline, end of treatment (2-3 months), and 6-month follow-up
Délai: Baseline, At each intervention visit (approximately weekly up to end of treatment at 2-3 months), and at 6-month follow-up
Change in severity of depression symptoms will be assessed using two different measures. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a nine item depression screening tool, developed and validated for use in primary care settings. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20 (HSCL-20) measures depression symptom severity and distress.
Baseline, At each intervention visit (approximately weekly up to end of treatment at 2-3 months), and at 6-month follow-up

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Past 30-day Functioning at baseline, end of treatment (2-3 months), and 6-month follow-up
Délai: Baseline, At each intervention visit (approximately weekly up to end of treatment at 2-3 months), and at 6-month follow-up
Overall functioning over the past 30 days was measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS 2.0).
Baseline, At each intervention visit (approximately weekly up to end of treatment at 2-3 months), and at 6-month follow-up

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Margarita Alegria, Ph.D., Cambridge Health Alliance
  • Chercheur principal: Glorisa Canino, Ph.D., University of Puerto Rico

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Liens utiles

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 mai 2011

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 septembre 2012

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 septembre 2012

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

18 décembre 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 janvier 2014

Première publication (Estimation)

6 janvier 2014

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

3 juin 2016

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 juin 2016

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2016

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • CHA-IRB-0465/08/10
  • 3P60MD002261 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

3
S'abonner