Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse

23 de marzo de 2018 actualizado por: Andrea Morciano, Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico

Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Continuous Suture for Mesh Fixation

This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional single 5-points suture for anterior mesh fixation.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Introduction Pelvic-organ prolapse, in which the pelvic organs (uterus, bladder, and bowel) protrude into or past the vaginal introitus, is a condition often treated with surgery. Women have an 11 percent risk of surgery for prolapse or urinary incontinence by 80 years of age, and of this 11 percent, almost one third of the women have a second surgery. This fact points to the need for improved treatment of pelvic-floor disorders. Numerous surgical procedures have been described for the management of POP. Vaginal surgery may be associated with less postoperative pain and a more rapid return to daily living than abdominal repair. However, in a randomised study, sacrocolpopexy was twice as likely to result in optimal anatomical outcome as vaginal surgery. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provides the potential to combine the success rates of an abdominal approach with the faster recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique. Tissue dissection and mesh placement may also be facilitated by the magnification and field of view permitted by the laparoscopic approach. These benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time from 150 to 250 minutes according to surgeons' experience. In addition, this procedure is often associated to subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) for the reasons of prevention (post-menopause age) or uterine diseases, which improve still more the operating time.

This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional 5-points single suture for anterior mesh fixation.

Secondary endopoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications estimated blood loss, postoperative pain (evaluated by VAS), days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.

Statistical Analysis and Study Design This is a single Institution prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at the Pia Fondazione Panico of Tricase, Italy.

To have an imbalanced results and to reduce any bias, a randomization list has been checked.

Probability (p) values will be considered to be statistically significant at the <0.05 level.

There will be recruited 20 patients to treat using continuous locked suture and 20 patients to treat with standard 5-points single suture for mesh fixation comparing these two techniques in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss and other intra- or post operative complications, postoperative pain, days of hospitalization, costs. All patients will be adequately informed and inserted in the study only after having read and signed an informed consent. Diagnostic, clinical and surgical data of each patient will be prospectively recorded. At the end of the procedure, a schedule will be compiled with intraoperative data. All clinical and histologic data will be recorded prospectively using a database. Pain associated with the procedure will be evaluated by a subjective assessment (analysis of VAS scale values reported by patients at 8 and 24 hours after surgery). Post-operative complications will be evaluated during the first 30 days after surgery according to Dindo's classification.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

80

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

50 años a 80 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

For patients

  • Age ≤ 80 years
  • Patient's informed consent
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV
  • Physiologic, surgical or iatrogenic menopause.
  • No previous major abdominal surgical procedures

For diseases

  • POP-Q stage III/IV for anterior and/or apical compartment; stage <III for posterior compartment.
  • No uterine cervix dysplasia or endometrial disorders.
  • No uterine size larger than conform 10 weeks gestation

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Continuous Suture
To verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using continuous locked suture vs traditional 5-points suture for mesh fixation
Comparador activo: Single 5-points Suture
To verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using continuous locked suture vs traditional 5-points suture for mesh fixation

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Operative Time
Periodo de tiempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Operative time for LPS subtotal hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy operative time will be calculated from the entrance in the abdominal cavity.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Recurrent Prolapse
Periodo de tiempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Appearance of recurrent prolapse after one year from surgery
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Andrea Morciano, M.D., Pia Fondazione Giovanni Panico

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de enero de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de abril de 2017

Finalización del estudio (Anticipado)

1 de abril de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

30 de enero de 2018

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de febrero de 2018

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

9 de febrero de 2018

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

26 de marzo de 2018

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

23 de marzo de 2018

Última verificación

1 de marzo de 2018

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • LSCContinua

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir