- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT03427606
Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Continuous Suture for Mesh Fixation
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
Introduction Pelvic-organ prolapse, in which the pelvic organs (uterus, bladder, and bowel) protrude into or past the vaginal introitus, is a condition often treated with surgery. Women have an 11 percent risk of surgery for prolapse or urinary incontinence by 80 years of age, and of this 11 percent, almost one third of the women have a second surgery. This fact points to the need for improved treatment of pelvic-floor disorders. Numerous surgical procedures have been described for the management of POP. Vaginal surgery may be associated with less postoperative pain and a more rapid return to daily living than abdominal repair. However, in a randomised study, sacrocolpopexy was twice as likely to result in optimal anatomical outcome as vaginal surgery. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provides the potential to combine the success rates of an abdominal approach with the faster recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique. Tissue dissection and mesh placement may also be facilitated by the magnification and field of view permitted by the laparoscopic approach. These benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time from 150 to 250 minutes according to surgeons' experience. In addition, this procedure is often associated to subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) for the reasons of prevention (post-menopause age) or uterine diseases, which improve still more the operating time.
This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional 5-points single suture for anterior mesh fixation.
Secondary endopoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications estimated blood loss, postoperative pain (evaluated by VAS), days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.
Statistical Analysis and Study Design This is a single Institution prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at the Pia Fondazione Panico of Tricase, Italy.
To have an imbalanced results and to reduce any bias, a randomization list has been checked.
Probability (p) values will be considered to be statistically significant at the <0.05 level.
There will be recruited 20 patients to treat using continuous locked suture and 20 patients to treat with standard 5-points single suture for mesh fixation comparing these two techniques in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss and other intra- or post operative complications, postoperative pain, days of hospitalization, costs. All patients will be adequately informed and inserted in the study only after having read and signed an informed consent. Diagnostic, clinical and surgical data of each patient will be prospectively recorded. At the end of the procedure, a schedule will be compiled with intraoperative data. All clinical and histologic data will be recorded prospectively using a database. Pain associated with the procedure will be evaluated by a subjective assessment (analysis of VAS scale values reported by patients at 8 and 24 hours after surgery). Post-operative complications will be evaluated during the first 30 days after surgery according to Dindo's classification.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
For patients
- Age ≤ 80 years
- Patient's informed consent
- American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV
- Physiologic, surgical or iatrogenic menopause.
- No previous major abdominal surgical procedures
For diseases
- POP-Q stage III/IV for anterior and/or apical compartment; stage <III for posterior compartment.
- No uterine cervix dysplasia or endometrial disorders.
- No uterine size larger than conform 10 weeks gestation
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Trattamento
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Doppio
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Continuous Suture
|
Procedura: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
To verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using continuous locked suture vs traditional 5-points suture for mesh fixation
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Single 5-points Suture
|
Procedura: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
To verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using continuous locked suture vs traditional 5-points suture for mesh fixation
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Operative Time
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Operative time for LPS subtotal hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy operative time will be calculated from the entrance in the abdominal cavity.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Recurrent Prolapse
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Appearance of recurrent prolapse after one year from surgery
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Andrea Morciano, M.D., Pia Fondazione Giovanni Panico
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Anticipato)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- LSCContinua
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Prolasso degli organi pelvici
-
University Hospital, MontpellierReclutamentoChirurgia ricostruttiva mediante ale perforanti perforanti o libere a pedale | ESCHAR PELVIC | Patologia traumatica dell'arto inferiore e/o superioreFrancia