Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Clinical Evaluation of the Access Socket Flexible Socket for Transtibial Prosthesis (AS-TT)

Transtibial amputation significantly impacts patient autonomy and quality of life, primarily due to the limitations of conventional rigid sockets, which restrict comfort and joint range of motion. The Access Socket (AS) is an innovative prosthetic socket combining a rigid carbon-fiber structure in key load-bearing areas with flexible urethane-resin (ProtheFLEX®) zones in regions typically rigid in conventional sockets. This hybrid design aims to improve comfort and pressure distribution while preserving the mechanical properties required for ambulation.

The AS has already demonstrated benefits in transfemoral amputees and is now reimbursed in France for that population. A preliminary uncontrolled study in 12 transtibial amputees suggested significant improvements in perceived function, comfort, satisfaction, and mobility.

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-arm crossover study aims to compare the (AS) with the standard rigid socket (RS) in 25 adults with transtibial amputation. Participants will wear each socket for approximately 4 weeks (after a 1-2 week adaptation period) in a randomized order. The primary outcome is the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Secondary outcomes include comfort (SCS), satisfaction (OPUS), psychosocial adjustment (TAPES-R), mobility (PLUS-M), prosthesis utility (PEQ-U), and the proportion of patients electing to keep the AS at study completion.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Background. Lower-limb amputation affects more than 7,500 people annually in France, with approximately 50% at the transtibial level. The socket is the critical interface between the residual limb and the prosthesis, transmitting mechanical forces while needing to remain comfortable. Currently, only RS (carbon or resin) are listed on the French reimbursable products list (LPPR) for transtibial amputation. Documented limitations of rigid sockets include restricted knee flexion, walking discomfort in challenging environments, donning difficulties, and suboptimal pressure distribution that does not adapt to residual-limb volume changes.

Investigational device. The AS follows the same molding and shaping principles as the standard RS but differs in two manufacturing steps: (1) carbon fibers are placed only on lateral, postero-inferior, and inferior areas to provide structural rigidity; (2) stratification uses urethane resin (ProtheFLEX®, already used in medical-device manufacturing) instead of epoxy or acrylic resin, creating soft zones in regions typically rigid in conventional sockets.

Comparator. Both sockets are manufactured from the same plaster mold to ensure strictly identical internal geometry. Only the material structure (carbon/urethane distribution) differs; all other prosthetic components (intermediate piece, prosthetic foot) are identical.

Design rationale. A double-blind design is not feasible because participants can perceive differences in socket rigidity and prosthesis weight. The crossover design controls for between-subject variability and order effects.

Sample size. Based on the preliminary study (Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) standard deviation 1.74), to detect a difference of 1.3 points (the PSFS MDC₉₀ for 3 items) with 80% power and α=0.05, 19 participants are required. 25 will be enrolled to account for dropouts and to provide a more representative sample for secondary endpoints.

Visits. Four study visits over approximately 14-21 weeks per participant: inclusion (V0), evaluation after first socket period (V1), evaluation after second socket period (V2), and an optional follow-up visit (V3) one month later if the participant elects to keep the AS.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

25

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Clamart, Francia, 92140
        • Reclutamiento
        • Hôpital National d'Instruction des Armées (HNIA) Percy
        • Investigador principal:
          • Marie Thomas-Pohl, MD
        • Contacto:
      • Freyming-Merlebach, Francia, 57804
        • Reclutamiento
        • Hôpital Filieris de Freyming-Merlebach
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Catherine Achour
      • Grenoble, Francia, 38434
        • Reclutamiento
        • CHU Grenoble Alpes - Hôpital Sud
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Solène MAret, MD
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Phillipe Escobar, MD
      • Nancy, Francia, 54000
      • Paris, Francia, 75007
        • Reclutamiento
        • Insititution Nationale des Invalides
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral or bilateral transtibial amputation
  • Currently fitted with a definitive carbon rigid socket
  • Any residual-limb shape
  • Any etiology
  • Able to understand simple instructions, read, write, and provide informed consent - or able to be accompanied by a trusted person in case of inability to read/write autonomously
  • Provided free written informed consent
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Affiliated to a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of hydroalcoholic solution (HAS) for socket donning
  • Currently fitted with a provisional socket
  • Neurological pathology limiting capacity to participate in activities
  • Orthopedic pathology limiting capacity to participate in activities
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Minors
  • Persons not under legal protection or unable to express consent
  • Persons under guardianship or curatorship
  • Persons under judicial protection

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación cruzada
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Group 1 (RS -> AS)
Participants wear their standard rigid socket (RS) for 4 weeks, complete evaluation, then switch to the Access Socket (AS) for 1-2 weeks of adaptation followed by 4 weeks of wear, with a second evaluation.
Hybrid prosthetic socket combining a rigid carbon-fiber structure in load-bearing areas (lateral, postero-inferior, inferior) with flexible urethane-resin (ProtheFLEX®) zones in regions typically rigid in conventional sockets. Manufactured from the same plaster mold as the rigid socket to ensure identical internal geometry.
Conventional definitive carbon-fiber rigid socket, currently the only socket type reimbursed in France for transtibial amputation (LPPR-listed). Standard of care comparator.
Comparador activo: Group 2 (AS -> RS)
Participants receive the Access Socket (AS) first, with 1-2 weeks of adaptation followed by 4 weeks of wear and evaluation. They then switch to the standard rigid socket (RS) for 1-2 weeks of adaptation and 4 weeks of wear, with a second evaluation.
Hybrid prosthetic socket combining a rigid carbon-fiber structure in load-bearing areas (lateral, postero-inferior, inferior) with flexible urethane-resin (ProtheFLEX®) zones in regions typically rigid in conventional sockets. Manufactured from the same plaster mold as the rigid socket to ensure identical internal geometry.
Conventional definitive carbon-fiber rigid socket, currently the only socket type reimbursed in France for transtibial amputation (LPPR-listed). Standard of care comparator.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) score
Periodo de tiempo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Patient-centered self-report tool. The patient identifies 3-5 specific activities they have difficulty performing, then rates their ability on a 0-10 scale (0 = unable to perform, 10 = able to perform at pre-injury level). The final score is the mean of the ratings
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Socket Comfort Scale (SCS) score
Periodo de tiempo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
0-10 numerical rating of socket comfort (0 = least comfortable imaginable, 10 = most comfortable imaginable)
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Orthotics Prosthetics Users Survey (OPUS) score
Periodo de tiempo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Self-report instrument evaluating functional outcomes and quality of life specifically for orthosis and prosthesis users. Assesses lower-limb functional status, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with the device, and satisfaction with services. The higher the score, the more favorable the result for the device
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale - Revised (TAPES-R) score
Periodo de tiempo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
33-item multidimensional questionnaire evaluating psychosocial adjustment to amputation and prosthesis use, including general adjustment, social adjustment, activity restriction, and prosthesis satisfaction. The higher the global score, the more favorable the result for the device
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire - Utility subscale (PEQ-U) score
Periodo de tiempo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
The score is calculated as the mean of the 8 items in the subscale. Each item is rated on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 100. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a better outcome (greater satisfaction and prosthesis utility)
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Proportion of participants electing to keep the Access Socket at study completion
Periodo de tiempo: Through study completion, an average of 10 weeks
Percentage of participants who choose the AS over the RS at the end of the study, reported with 95% confidence interval. Participants are not informed of this option until the end of the study to avoid judgment bias
Through study completion, an average of 10 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

27 de abril de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

27 de abril de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de octubre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

5 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

18 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

18 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

: Individual participant data will not be shared. Aggregated study results will be published in scientific journals and a summary report will be transmitted to the CPP within 12 months of study completion

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir