Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Clinical Evaluation of the Access Socket Flexible Socket for Transtibial Prosthesis (AS-TT)

Transtibial amputation significantly impacts patient autonomy and quality of life, primarily due to the limitations of conventional rigid sockets, which restrict comfort and joint range of motion. The Access Socket (AS) is an innovative prosthetic socket combining a rigid carbon-fiber structure in key load-bearing areas with flexible urethane-resin (ProtheFLEX®) zones in regions typically rigid in conventional sockets. This hybrid design aims to improve comfort and pressure distribution while preserving the mechanical properties required for ambulation.

The AS has already demonstrated benefits in transfemoral amputees and is now reimbursed in France for that population. A preliminary uncontrolled study in 12 transtibial amputees suggested significant improvements in perceived function, comfort, satisfaction, and mobility.

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-arm crossover study aims to compare the (AS) with the standard rigid socket (RS) in 25 adults with transtibial amputation. Participants will wear each socket for approximately 4 weeks (after a 1-2 week adaptation period) in a randomized order. The primary outcome is the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Secondary outcomes include comfort (SCS), satisfaction (OPUS), psychosocial adjustment (TAPES-R), mobility (PLUS-M), prosthesis utility (PEQ-U), and the proportion of patients electing to keep the AS at study completion.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Background. Lower-limb amputation affects more than 7,500 people annually in France, with approximately 50% at the transtibial level. The socket is the critical interface between the residual limb and the prosthesis, transmitting mechanical forces while needing to remain comfortable. Currently, only RS (carbon or resin) are listed on the French reimbursable products list (LPPR) for transtibial amputation. Documented limitations of rigid sockets include restricted knee flexion, walking discomfort in challenging environments, donning difficulties, and suboptimal pressure distribution that does not adapt to residual-limb volume changes.

Investigational device. The AS follows the same molding and shaping principles as the standard RS but differs in two manufacturing steps: (1) carbon fibers are placed only on lateral, postero-inferior, and inferior areas to provide structural rigidity; (2) stratification uses urethane resin (ProtheFLEX®, already used in medical-device manufacturing) instead of epoxy or acrylic resin, creating soft zones in regions typically rigid in conventional sockets.

Comparator. Both sockets are manufactured from the same plaster mold to ensure strictly identical internal geometry. Only the material structure (carbon/urethane distribution) differs; all other prosthetic components (intermediate piece, prosthetic foot) are identical.

Design rationale. A double-blind design is not feasible because participants can perceive differences in socket rigidity and prosthesis weight. The crossover design controls for between-subject variability and order effects.

Sample size. Based on the preliminary study (Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) standard deviation 1.74), to detect a difference of 1.3 points (the PSFS MDC₉₀ for 3 items) with 80% power and α=0.05, 19 participants are required. 25 will be enrolled to account for dropouts and to provide a more representative sample for secondary endpoints.

Visits. Four study visits over approximately 14-21 weeks per participant: inclusion (V0), evaluation after first socket period (V1), evaluation after second socket period (V2), and an optional follow-up visit (V3) one month later if the participant elects to keep the AS.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

25

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

      • Clamart, França, 92140
        • Recrutamento
        • Hôpital National d'Instruction des Armées (HNIA) Percy
        • Investigador principal:
          • Marie Thomas-Pohl, MD
        • Contato:
      • Freyming-Merlebach, França, 57804
        • Recrutamento
        • Hôpital Filieris de Freyming-Merlebach
        • Contato:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Catherine Achour
      • Grenoble, França, 38434
        • Recrutamento
        • CHU Grenoble Alpes - Hôpital Sud
        • Contato:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Solène MAret, MD
        • Subinvestigador:
          • Phillipe Escobar, MD
      • Nancy, França, 54000
      • Paris, França, 75007
        • Recrutamento
        • Insititution Nationale des Invalides
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral or bilateral transtibial amputation
  • Currently fitted with a definitive carbon rigid socket
  • Any residual-limb shape
  • Any etiology
  • Able to understand simple instructions, read, write, and provide informed consent - or able to be accompanied by a trusted person in case of inability to read/write autonomously
  • Provided free written informed consent
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Affiliated to a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of hydroalcoholic solution (HAS) for socket donning
  • Currently fitted with a provisional socket
  • Neurological pathology limiting capacity to participate in activities
  • Orthopedic pathology limiting capacity to participate in activities
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Minors
  • Persons not under legal protection or unable to express consent
  • Persons under guardianship or curatorship
  • Persons under judicial protection

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Group 1 (RS -> AS)
Participants wear their standard rigid socket (RS) for 4 weeks, complete evaluation, then switch to the Access Socket (AS) for 1-2 weeks of adaptation followed by 4 weeks of wear, with a second evaluation.
Hybrid prosthetic socket combining a rigid carbon-fiber structure in load-bearing areas (lateral, postero-inferior, inferior) with flexible urethane-resin (ProtheFLEX®) zones in regions typically rigid in conventional sockets. Manufactured from the same plaster mold as the rigid socket to ensure identical internal geometry.
Conventional definitive carbon-fiber rigid socket, currently the only socket type reimbursed in France for transtibial amputation (LPPR-listed). Standard of care comparator.
Comparador Ativo: Group 2 (AS -> RS)
Participants receive the Access Socket (AS) first, with 1-2 weeks of adaptation followed by 4 weeks of wear and evaluation. They then switch to the standard rigid socket (RS) for 1-2 weeks of adaptation and 4 weeks of wear, with a second evaluation.
Hybrid prosthetic socket combining a rigid carbon-fiber structure in load-bearing areas (lateral, postero-inferior, inferior) with flexible urethane-resin (ProtheFLEX®) zones in regions typically rigid in conventional sockets. Manufactured from the same plaster mold as the rigid socket to ensure identical internal geometry.
Conventional definitive carbon-fiber rigid socket, currently the only socket type reimbursed in France for transtibial amputation (LPPR-listed). Standard of care comparator.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) score
Prazo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Patient-centered self-report tool. The patient identifies 3-5 specific activities they have difficulty performing, then rates their ability on a 0-10 scale (0 = unable to perform, 10 = able to perform at pre-injury level). The final score is the mean of the ratings
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Socket Comfort Scale (SCS) score
Prazo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
0-10 numerical rating of socket comfort (0 = least comfortable imaginable, 10 = most comfortable imaginable)
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Orthotics Prosthetics Users Survey (OPUS) score
Prazo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Self-report instrument evaluating functional outcomes and quality of life specifically for orthosis and prosthesis users. Assesses lower-limb functional status, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with the device, and satisfaction with services. The higher the score, the more favorable the result for the device
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale - Revised (TAPES-R) score
Prazo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
33-item multidimensional questionnaire evaluating psychosocial adjustment to amputation and prosthesis use, including general adjustment, social adjustment, activity restriction, and prosthesis satisfaction. The higher the global score, the more favorable the result for the device
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire - Utility subscale (PEQ-U) score
Prazo: One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
The score is calculated as the mean of the 8 items in the subscale. Each item is rated on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 100. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a better outcome (greater satisfaction and prosthesis utility)
One time at the end of each 4-week wear period (V1, V2 and V3)
Proportion of participants electing to keep the Access Socket at study completion
Prazo: Through study completion, an average of 10 weeks
Percentage of participants who choose the AS over the RS at the end of the study, reported with 95% confidence interval. Participants are not informed of this option until the end of the study to avoid judgment bias
Through study completion, an average of 10 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

27 de abril de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

27 de abril de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

30 de outubro de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

5 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

13 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

18 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

18 de maio de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

13 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Descrição do plano IPD

: Individual participant data will not be shared. Aggregated study results will be published in scientific journals and a summary report will be transmitted to the CPP within 12 months of study completion

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever