- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07595471
Proximal Spread in Adductor Canal Block(ACB) (ACB)
12 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Müge Çakırca, Ankara Etlik City Hospital
The Impact of Injection Level on the Proximal Spread of Local Anesthetic and Clinical Outcomes in Adductor Canal Block
This prospective, randomized clinical study is designed to evaluate the effects of two different injection levels of adductor canal block (ACB) on the proximal spread of local anesthetic and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
The study will be conducted at Ankara Etlik City Hospital and will include a total of 68 patients.
All cases are limited to unilateral elective knee replacement surgeries performed under spinal anesthesia.
In this study, the comparison will be based on the application of adductor canal block at two distinct injection levels.
In both groups, blocks will be performed under ultrasound (USG) guidance using the same technical principles and standardized conditions; in the first group, the block will be administered at the level where the vasto-adductor membrane is first visualized, while in the second group, it will be performed at the level where the adductor longus ends.
The type, concentration, and volume of local anesthetic used in both groups will be standardized as 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.
The groups will be compared in terms of the proximal spread of the local anesthetic based on the injection level, the area of spread at the apex of the iliopectineal fossa, the involvement of the femoral nerve, the incidence of postoperative falls, and analgesic consumption.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Activo, no reclutando
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
This prospective, randomized clinical trial is designed to evaluate the effects of two distinct injection levels of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) on the proximal spread of local anesthetic and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
The study will be conducted at Ankara Etlik City Hospital with a total of 68 patients.
All cases are limited to unilateral elective knee replacement surgeries performed under spinal anesthesia.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Inclusion criteria are defined as patients aged 18 years and older, with an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status of I-III, scheduled for elective unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia.
Exclusion criteria include patients scheduled for bilateral knee arthroplasty, known allergy to local anesthetics, chronic pain syndromes or regular opioid use, peripheral neuropathy or neurological diseases affecting femoral nerve function, coagulopathy or use of anticoagulant therapy, infection at the injection site, and patients unable to provide written informed consent.
Randomization and Intervention Patients will be randomized into two groups using the sealed envelope method.
In Group 1, the ACB will be performed under ultrasound (USG) guidance at the level where the vasto-adductor membrane (VAM) is first visualized.
In Group 2, the block will be performed at the level where the adductor longus muscle ends.
All blocks will be administered by experienced anesthesiologists using a standardized dose of 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine.
Clinicians performing the block will not be involved in the postoperative data collection process.
Procedure and Monitoring All patients will undergo standard monitoring, including electrocardiography (EKG), non-invasive arterial blood pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO_2).
Following the administration of spinal anesthesia according to clinical protocols, the ACB will be performed under USG guidance based on the randomization results.
Standard care will be provided throughout the surgical and anesthetic management, and perioperative data will be recorded.
Outcome Measures and Evaluation Following the block, the spread of the local anesthetic will be evaluated in real-time using ultrasound.
The distance between the injection point and the highest proximal point of the anesthetic spread will be measured in centimeters.
Additionally, the spread area of the local anesthetic at the level of the apex of the iliopectineal fossa will be recorded using the planimetric measurement tools of the USG device.
The reach of the local anesthetic to the femoral nerve will also be assessed via USG.
Postoperatively, patients will follow standard clinical monitoring.
Motor block will be evaluated based on the incidence of postoperative falls (yes/no).
Sensory block efficacy will be assessed through total analgesic consumption recorded within the first 24 hours postoperatively.
All collected data will be recorded for statistical analysis and compared based on the injection levels.
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Estimado)
68
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Ankara, Turquía (Türkiye), 06000
- Ankara Etlik City Hospital
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients aged > 18 years.
- ASA physical status classification I-III.
- Patients scheduled for elective, unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
- Planned administration of spinal anesthesia.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:Scheduled for bilateral knee arthroplasty.
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to local anesthetics.
- History of chronic pain syndrome or regular opioid consumption.
- Presence of peripheral neuropathy or neurological disorders affecting the femoral nerve.
- Coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulant therapy.
- Active infection at the site of injection.
- Inability or refusal to provide written informed consent.
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Otro
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador activo: Group 1: ACB at the proximal vasto-adductor membrane level (20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine)
Group 1: Patients receiving ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine at the level where the vasto-adductor membrane is first visualized.
|
In this study, patients were evaluated using two distinct approaches based on the evolution of anatomical definitions in recent literature: the proximal application, traditionally referred to as the adductor canal block but now more accurately defined as the 'Femoral Triangle Block' in current publications,
|
|
Comparador activo: Group 2: Level of the end of the adductor longus
Group 2: Patients receiving ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine at the level where the adductor longus muscle ends.
|
In this study, patients were evaluated using two distinct approaches based on the evolution of anatomical definitions in recent literature: the proximal application, traditionally referred to as the adductor canal block but now more accurately defined as the true 'Distal Adductor Canal Block' performed in accordance with contemporary anatomical criteria."
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Proximal spread of local anesthetic
Periodo de tiempo: The first postoperative hour
|
The primary objective of this study is to compare the proximal spread of local anesthetic following ultrasound-guided adductor canal block performed at two distinct injection levels.
In the first group, the injection will be administered at the level where the vastoadductor membrane is first visualized ultrasonographically in the proximal region.
In the second group, the injection will be performed at the level where the adductor magnus and sartorius muscles first intersect.In both patient groups, the area of local anesthetic spread at the apex of the iliopectineal fossa will be measured in $cm^2$ using ultrasonography.
Additionally, the distance between the needle insertion point (injection level) and the apex of the iliopectineal fossa, as well as the distance from the needle insertion point to the most proximal point where the local anesthetic is ultrasonographically visualized, will be recorded in cm.
|
The first postoperative hour
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Scores (Numeric Rating Scale)
Periodo de tiempo: post-op hours 6 and 24
|
Evaluation of NRS(Numeric Rating Scale) scores at the 6th and 24th postoperative hours.The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a common subjective clinical tool that requires patients to quantify their pain intensity on a scale ranging from 0 to 10
|
post-op hours 6 and 24
|
|
Assessment of Motor Block
Periodo de tiempo: Postoperative 24th hours
|
Motor block and falls were evaluated at the 24th hour.Ambulation was assessed within the first 24 hours postoperatively.
Successful ambulation was defined as the ability to walk without falling; patients who failed to ambulate or suffered a fall during the attempt were categorized as 'treatment failure'.
|
Postoperative 24th hours
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
7 de abril de 2026
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
30 de mayo de 2026
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
1 de junio de 2026
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
7 de abril de 2026
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
12 de mayo de 2026
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
19 de mayo de 2026
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
19 de mayo de 2026
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
12 de mayo de 2026
Última verificación
1 de mayo de 2026
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 2024-KAEK-40 (Otro identificador: Ankara Etlik City Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee)
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
NO
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .