Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Session-Order Sensitivity of TS and OA in a Capsaicin Crossover Model (TS-OA-Cap)

3 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: John Srbely, University of Guelph

Session-order Sensitivity of Temporal Summation and Offset Analgesia in a Randomised Crossover Capsaicin Model of Secondary Hyperalgesia

Temporal summation (TS) and offset analgesia (OA) are widely used psychophysical endpoints in pain research that index different components of central nociceptive processing. While crossover designs are commonly used in experimental pain studies to reduce between-participant variability, the design-stability of these endpoints under repeated testing during experimental sensitisation is not well characterised. This study compared the design-stability of mechanical TS (Sumscore) and offset analgesia magnitude (OffA) in a two-period, vehicle-controlled crossover trial of capsaicin-evoked secondary hyperalgesia in healthy adults. The primary aim was methodological: to determine whether session-order effects differ between TS and OffA when these are used as outcome measures in two-period crossover designs of capsaicin-induced central sensitisation. Topical capsaicin was used as a reversible experimental intervention to create a controlled, transient state of secondary hyperalgesia rather than as a therapeutic intervention. The study informs endpoint selection in future quantitative sensory testing (QST) crossover trials.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

This was a single-site, two-period, vehicle-controlled, allocation- and formulation-blinded, randomised crossover study conducted at the Department of Human Health Science, University of Guelph, Canada. Sixteen healthy adult volunteers (10 female, 6 male; mean age 21.9 years) were recruited between May 2024 and April 2025. Participants were randomised in a 1:1 intended allocation to one of two sequences: capsaicin-first then vehicle (Sequence A-to-B) or vehicle-first then capsaicin (Sequence B-to-A); actual allocation was 6:10. The allocation sequence was computer-generated by a research assistant not involved in outcome collection. Sessions were separated by a minimum 1-week washout. Topical 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix; Hi-Tech Pharmacal) was applied as a 5 mL dose to a 5 x 10 cm target area on the lateral elbow and to bilateral C5-C6 cervicothoracic dermatomes. The comparator was an equivalent 5 mL volume of inert vehicle lotion (Lubriderm; Johnson & Johnson) applied identically; creams were matched for colour and texture and prepared by a research assistant in unlabelled containers. Mechanical temporal summation (Sumscore; 256 mN pinprick, 16 stimuli at 1 Hz) and thermal offset analgesia (OA; 32-46°C stepped-stimulus protocol with three thermal hold durations of 5, 10, and 15 s) were assessed at baseline and at 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention. Continuous pain ratings during thermal stimulation were captured via CoVAS. Primary outcomes (Sumscore and the duration-averaged baseline-normalised OffA) were analysed using REML linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for Intervention, Time, Intervention x Time, Period, and Sequence, with random intercepts for Participant; sex was included as a pre-specified covariate. Within-session temporal stability was assessed using ICC(2,1). A combined Measure x Intervention x Period model tested for differential design-sensitivity between TS and OffA. The study was approved by the University of Guelph Research Ethics Board (REB #19-06-003).

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

16

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Canadá
    • Ontario
      • Guelph, Ontario, Canadá, N1G2W1
        • Human Health Sciences, University of Guelph

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adult volunteers (≥18 years of age)
  • Able to provide written informed consent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or chronic pain
  • Neurological disease
  • Skin conditions or sensitivity over the test sites to capsaicin
  • Contraindications to thermal stimulation of the skin
  • Musculoskeletal conditions that could alter somatosensory processing
  • Use of analgesic medications within 24 hours prior to each session
  • Use of caffeine within 24 hours prior to each session
  • Use of alcohol within 24 hours prior to each session

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Ciencia básica
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación cruzada
  • Enmascaramiento: Triple

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Arm 1: Sequence A-to-B (Capsaicin first)
Participants received topical 0.075% capsaicin (Zostrix) cream (5 mL) in Period 1, followed by topical inert (Lubriderm) vehicle (5 mL) in Period 2. Periods were separated by a minimum 1-week washout. n = 6.
Droga: Topical 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix)
5 mL of 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix; Hi-Tech Pharmacal, Amityville, NY, USA) applied to a 5 x 10 cm target region on the lateral elbow and to bilateral C5-C6 cervicothoracic dermatomes (total 15 mL). The cream was massaged into the skin by a gloved investigator until no residue was visible. Used as an experimental probe to evoke transient, reversible secondary hyperalgesia; not under therapeutic evaluation.
Otro: Topical vehicle lotion (Lubriderm)
5 mL of inert vehicle lotion (Lubriderm; Johnson & Johnson, Montgomery, NJ, USA) applied to the same dermatomes as the capsaicin condition (total 15 mL), using the identical preparation and massage technique. Matched to the capsaicin cream for colour and texture.
Comparador activo: Arm 2: Sequence B-to-A (Vehicle first)
Participants received topical inert (Lubriderm) vehicle (5 mL) in Period 1, followed by topical 0.075% capsaicin (Zostrix) cream (5 mL) in Period 2. Periods were separated by a minimum 1-week washout. n = 10.
Droga: Topical 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix)
5 mL of 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix; Hi-Tech Pharmacal, Amityville, NY, USA) applied to a 5 x 10 cm target region on the lateral elbow and to bilateral C5-C6 cervicothoracic dermatomes (total 15 mL). The cream was massaged into the skin by a gloved investigator until no residue was visible. Used as an experimental probe to evoke transient, reversible secondary hyperalgesia; not under therapeutic evaluation.
Otro: Topical vehicle lotion (Lubriderm)
5 mL of inert vehicle lotion (Lubriderm; Johnson & Johnson, Montgomery, NJ, USA) applied to the same dermatomes as the capsaicin condition (total 15 mL), using the identical preparation and massage technique. Matched to the capsaicin cream for colour and texture.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Mechanical temporal summation (Sumscore)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)
Sumscore is a summed pinprick temporal-summation response computed from a train of 16 repeated 256 mN pinprick stimuli delivered perpendicularly to the skin at 1 Hz, paced by a metronome. Pain ratings (NPRS 0-10) immediately after each stimulus were summed (Clouse et al., 2021). The primary Sumscore endpoint was pre-specified as the average of the lateral and inferior testing sites at the lateral elbow, expressed as a baseline-normalised ratio.
Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)
Offset analgesia magnitude (OffA)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)
OffA was measured during a three-phase stepped-stimulus thermal protocol (32-45-46-45-32°C; T1/T2/T3 phases) using a 32 x 32 mm Peltier contact thermode (TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer, Medoc AMS). Continuous pain ratings were collected via CoVAS (0-100) at 10 Hz. OA magnitude was quantified as peak minus nadir CoVAS during the 46°C hold and the subsequent 45°C phase. The primary OffA endpoint was pre-specified as the duration-averaged value across three thermal hold durations (5, 10, and 15 s at 46°C), expressed as a baseline-normalised ratio.
Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Within-session temporal stability (ICC(2,1)) of Sumscore and OffA
Periodo de tiempo: 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1); Shrout and Fleiss, 1979) computed across the four post-intervention time points (10, 20, 30, 40 min) within each intervention condition, separately for Sumscore and OffA. Reported with bias-corrected bootstrap 95% confidence intervals.
10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention
Differential design-sensitivity (Measure × Intervention × Period interaction)
Periodo de tiempo: 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention, across two crossover periods separated by a minimum 1-week washout.
A combined linear mixed-effects model using within-measure z-scored outcomes tested whether the period-adjusted intervention estimate differed between TS and OffA. Three-way Measure x Intervention x Period interaction tested via Wald F-tests with residual degrees of freedom.
10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention, across two crossover periods separated by a minimum 1-week washout.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

University of Guelph

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2024

Finalización primaria (Actual)

30 de abril de 2025

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

30 de abril de 2025

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

22 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

4 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

4 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • GUELPH-REB-19-06-003
  • REB #19-06-003 (Otro identificador: University of Guelph)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and statistical analysis code will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to a data-use agreement and institutional ethics/data-sharing requirements. Materials required to reproduce the intervention and assessment protocol are described in the published Methods and Supplementary Materials.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

On request following publication of the primary manuscript.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Reasonable request to the corresponding author for non-commercial research use, subject to a data-use agreement consistent with University of Guelph data-sharing policy.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA
  • CIF
  • CÓDIGO_ANALÍTICO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir