Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Session-Order Sensitivity of TS and OA in a Capsaicin Crossover Model (TS-OA-Cap)

3 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: John Srbely, University of Guelph

Session-order Sensitivity of Temporal Summation and Offset Analgesia in a Randomised Crossover Capsaicin Model of Secondary Hyperalgesia

Temporal summation (TS) and offset analgesia (OA) are widely used psychophysical endpoints in pain research that index different components of central nociceptive processing. While crossover designs are commonly used in experimental pain studies to reduce between-participant variability, the design-stability of these endpoints under repeated testing during experimental sensitisation is not well characterised. This study compared the design-stability of mechanical TS (Sumscore) and offset analgesia magnitude (OffA) in a two-period, vehicle-controlled crossover trial of capsaicin-evoked secondary hyperalgesia in healthy adults. The primary aim was methodological: to determine whether session-order effects differ between TS and OffA when these are used as outcome measures in two-period crossover designs of capsaicin-induced central sensitisation. Topical capsaicin was used as a reversible experimental intervention to create a controlled, transient state of secondary hyperalgesia rather than as a therapeutic intervention. The study informs endpoint selection in future quantitative sensory testing (QST) crossover trials.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

This was a single-site, two-period, vehicle-controlled, allocation- and formulation-blinded, randomised crossover study conducted at the Department of Human Health Science, University of Guelph, Canada. Sixteen healthy adult volunteers (10 female, 6 male; mean age 21.9 years) were recruited between May 2024 and April 2025. Participants were randomised in a 1:1 intended allocation to one of two sequences: capsaicin-first then vehicle (Sequence A-to-B) or vehicle-first then capsaicin (Sequence B-to-A); actual allocation was 6:10. The allocation sequence was computer-generated by a research assistant not involved in outcome collection. Sessions were separated by a minimum 1-week washout. Topical 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix; Hi-Tech Pharmacal) was applied as a 5 mL dose to a 5 x 10 cm target area on the lateral elbow and to bilateral C5-C6 cervicothoracic dermatomes. The comparator was an equivalent 5 mL volume of inert vehicle lotion (Lubriderm; Johnson & Johnson) applied identically; creams were matched for colour and texture and prepared by a research assistant in unlabelled containers. Mechanical temporal summation (Sumscore; 256 mN pinprick, 16 stimuli at 1 Hz) and thermal offset analgesia (OA; 32-46°C stepped-stimulus protocol with three thermal hold durations of 5, 10, and 15 s) were assessed at baseline and at 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention. Continuous pain ratings during thermal stimulation were captured via CoVAS. Primary outcomes (Sumscore and the duration-averaged baseline-normalised OffA) were analysed using REML linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for Intervention, Time, Intervention x Time, Period, and Sequence, with random intercepts for Participant; sex was included as a pre-specified covariate. Within-session temporal stability was assessed using ICC(2,1). A combined Measure x Intervention x Period model tested for differential design-sensitivity between TS and OffA. The study was approved by the University of Guelph Research Ethics Board (REB #19-06-003).

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

16

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

  • Canadá
    • Ontario
      • Guelph, Ontario, Canadá, N1G2W1
        • Human Health Sciences, University of Guelph

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adult volunteers (≥18 years of age)
  • Able to provide written informed consent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or chronic pain
  • Neurological disease
  • Skin conditions or sensitivity over the test sites to capsaicin
  • Contraindications to thermal stimulation of the skin
  • Musculoskeletal conditions that could alter somatosensory processing
  • Use of analgesic medications within 24 hours prior to each session
  • Use of caffeine within 24 hours prior to each session
  • Use of alcohol within 24 hours prior to each session

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Ciência básica
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Triplo

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Arm 1: Sequence A-to-B (Capsaicin first)
Participants received topical 0.075% capsaicin (Zostrix) cream (5 mL) in Period 1, followed by topical inert (Lubriderm) vehicle (5 mL) in Period 2. Periods were separated by a minimum 1-week washout. n = 6.
Medicamento: Topical 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix)
5 mL of 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix; Hi-Tech Pharmacal, Amityville, NY, USA) applied to a 5 x 10 cm target region on the lateral elbow and to bilateral C5-C6 cervicothoracic dermatomes (total 15 mL). The cream was massaged into the skin by a gloved investigator until no residue was visible. Used as an experimental probe to evoke transient, reversible secondary hyperalgesia; not under therapeutic evaluation.
Outro: Topical vehicle lotion (Lubriderm)
5 mL of inert vehicle lotion (Lubriderm; Johnson & Johnson, Montgomery, NJ, USA) applied to the same dermatomes as the capsaicin condition (total 15 mL), using the identical preparation and massage technique. Matched to the capsaicin cream for colour and texture.
Comparador Ativo: Arm 2: Sequence B-to-A (Vehicle first)
Participants received topical inert (Lubriderm) vehicle (5 mL) in Period 1, followed by topical 0.075% capsaicin (Zostrix) cream (5 mL) in Period 2. Periods were separated by a minimum 1-week washout. n = 10.
Medicamento: Topical 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix)
5 mL of 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix; Hi-Tech Pharmacal, Amityville, NY, USA) applied to a 5 x 10 cm target region on the lateral elbow and to bilateral C5-C6 cervicothoracic dermatomes (total 15 mL). The cream was massaged into the skin by a gloved investigator until no residue was visible. Used as an experimental probe to evoke transient, reversible secondary hyperalgesia; not under therapeutic evaluation.
Outro: Topical vehicle lotion (Lubriderm)
5 mL of inert vehicle lotion (Lubriderm; Johnson & Johnson, Montgomery, NJ, USA) applied to the same dermatomes as the capsaicin condition (total 15 mL), using the identical preparation and massage technique. Matched to the capsaicin cream for colour and texture.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Mechanical temporal summation (Sumscore)
Prazo: Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)
Sumscore is a summed pinprick temporal-summation response computed from a train of 16 repeated 256 mN pinprick stimuli delivered perpendicularly to the skin at 1 Hz, paced by a metronome. Pain ratings (NPRS 0-10) immediately after each stimulus were summed (Clouse et al., 2021). The primary Sumscore endpoint was pre-specified as the average of the lateral and inferior testing sites at the lateral elbow, expressed as a baseline-normalised ratio.
Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)
Offset analgesia magnitude (OffA)
Prazo: Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)
OffA was measured during a three-phase stepped-stimulus thermal protocol (32-45-46-45-32°C; T1/T2/T3 phases) using a 32 x 32 mm Peltier contact thermode (TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer, Medoc AMS). Continuous pain ratings were collected via CoVAS (0-100) at 10 Hz. OA magnitude was quantified as peak minus nadir CoVAS during the 46°C hold and the subsequent 45°C phase. The primary OffA endpoint was pre-specified as the duration-averaged value across three thermal hold durations (5, 10, and 15 s at 46°C), expressed as a baseline-normalised ratio.
Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Within-session temporal stability (ICC(2,1)) of Sumscore and OffA
Prazo: 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1); Shrout and Fleiss, 1979) computed across the four post-intervention time points (10, 20, 30, 40 min) within each intervention condition, separately for Sumscore and OffA. Reported with bias-corrected bootstrap 95% confidence intervals.
10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention
Differential design-sensitivity (Measure × Intervention × Period interaction)
Prazo: 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention, across two crossover periods separated by a minimum 1-week washout.
A combined linear mixed-effects model using within-measure z-scored outcomes tested whether the period-adjusted intervention estimate differed between TS and OffA. Three-way Measure x Intervention x Period interaction tested via Wald F-tests with residual degrees of freedom.
10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention, across two crossover periods separated by a minimum 1-week washout.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

University of Guelph

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de maio de 2024

Conclusão Primária (Real)

30 de abril de 2025

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

30 de abril de 2025

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

22 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

3 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

4 de junho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

4 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

3 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • GUELPH-REB-19-06-003
  • REB #19-06-003 (Outro identificador: University of Guelph)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and statistical analysis code will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to a data-use agreement and institutional ethics/data-sharing requirements. Materials required to reproduce the intervention and assessment protocol are described in the published Methods and Supplementary Materials.

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

On request following publication of the primary manuscript.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

Reasonable request to the corresponding author for non-commercial research use, subject to a data-use agreement consistent with University of Guelph data-sharing policy.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA
  • CIF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever