Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Outpatient Versus Inpatient Management of Mild Acute Pancreatitis

9 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Imen Ben Ismail, Center for Traumatology and Major Burns, Ben Arous

Outpatient Versus Inpatient Management of Mild Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial

Acute pancreatitis is a sudden inflammation of the pancreas that causes severe abdominal pain. Most cases are mild and get better within a few days with basic supportive treatment such as fluids and pain relief. Currently, all patients with acute pancreatitis are admitted to hospital, even those with a very low risk of complications. This study will test whether patients with mild acute pancreatitis can be safely sent home with close follow-up (telephone calls on days 1, 2, and 3 after discharge and a clinic visit on day 4) instead of staying in hospital. Patients will be randomly assigned to either home management or standard hospitalization. We will compare the rate of treatment failure at 30 days between the two groups. We expect that home management will be as safe as hospitalization, while being more convenient for patients and less costly for the health system.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most common gastrointestinal causes of emergency hospital admission worldwide. Approximately 80% of cases are classified as mild according to the revised Atlanta Classification (2012) and resolve without organ failure or local complications within three to five days. Despite this favorable prognosis, current practice mandates universal inpatient admission. Only two small studies have explored outpatient management of mild AP, reporting treatment failure rates of 4-12% in the ambulatory arm; however, neither was prospectively randomized nor adequately powered for non-inferiority.

This trial is a prospective, single-center, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Patients presenting with mild AP, confirmed by at least two revised Atlanta (2012) criteria and classified as mild by a SIRS score of 0 and a Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score (HAPS) of 0, will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to outpatient management (Group A) or standard inpatient care (Group B). Randomization will use a table of random numbers with a block size of four. Group A patients will receive an initial 4-6 hour supervised observation period in the emergency department, followed by daily teleconsultation on days 1-3 and an in-person clinic visit on day 4. Group B patients will be admitted to hospital per standard institutional protocol. All patients will receive IAP/APA-compliant supportive care and a final 30-day outcome assessment. The primary endpoint is the 30-day treatment failure rate. Non-inferiority will be declared if the upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the between-group difference does not exceed 10%.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

150

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Túnez
    • Tunisia
      • Ben Arous, Tunisia, Túnez, 2074
        • Traumatology and great burns center
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis based on at least two of three revised Atlanta (2012) criteria: characteristic abdominal pain; serum lipase or amylase ≥3× upper limit of normal; or characteristic imaging findings Classification as mild acute pancreatitis: SIRS score = 0 and HAPS score = 0 at emergency department presentation Ability to tolerate oral intake at the time of randomisation Provision of written informed consent Presence of a competent caregiver at home Residence within 30-45 minutes' travel time from the hospital Ability to communicate by telephone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding Inability to maintain oral intake for reasons unrelated to acute pancreatitis Acute pancreatitis attributable to tumour, post-ERCP intervention, or abdominal trauma Concurrent choledocholithiasis with or without cholangitis Chronic pancreatitis or history of recurrent acute pancreatitis (≥2 prior episodes) ASA physical status classification ≥ 3 Clinical or radiological features suggesting moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis Alcohol withdrawal syndrome No competent caregiver at home Residence more than 30-45 minutes from the hospital Inability to communicate by telephone or equivalent means

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Outpatient Management (Group A)
Patients receive a 4-6 hour supervised observation in the emergency department, then are discharged with structured ambulatory follow-up: daily teleconsultation on Days 1, 2, and 3; in-person clinic visit with blood sampling on Day 4; open-access emergency readmission at any time; and a 30-day final consultation. All patients receive IAP/APA-compliant supportive care.
Otro: Outpatient Management (Group A)
Early discharge from the emergency department after 4-6 hours of observation, with structured teleconsultation follow-up on Days 1, 2, and 3, in-person review on Day 4, unrestricted emergency department access, and 30-day outcome assessment.
Comparador activo: Standard Inpatient Management (Group B)
Patients are admitted to the gastroenterology or surgical ward for conventional inpatient care with daily clinical and biological monitoring, intravenous fluids, analgesia, antiemetics, and early oral refeeding per IAP/APA guidelines. Discharge is determined by clinical improvement and full oral diet tolerance. A 30-day follow-up consultation is arranged at discharge.
Otro: Standard Inpatient Management (Group B)
Conventional ward admission with daily monitoring, intravenous supportive care, and discharge based on clinical improvement.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Treatment Failure Rate at 30 Days
Periodo de tiempo: 30 days from randomisation
Proportion of patients experiencing at least one of the following: food intolerance (<50% of a standard meal), persistent nausea or vomiting refractory to antiemetics, uncontrolled pain requiring parenteral analgesia or emergency attendance, new-onset SIRS or HAPS deterioration, or (Group A only) any unplanned hospital admission.
30 days from randomisation

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Recurrence of abdominal pain Assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 30 days
Recurrence of abdominal pain during the 30-day follow-up period, assessed at each contact point (teleconsultation Days 1, 2, 3; clinic visit Day 4; final visit Day 30) using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Recurrence is defined as any new episode of abdominal pain scoring ≥4/10 after an initial pain-free interval following discharge or hospital admission.
30 days
SIRS score at 48 hours
Periodo de tiempo: 48 hours
48 hours
Organ failure Assessed by the Modified Marshall Scoring System
Periodo de tiempo: 30 days
Rate of organ failure occurring within 30 days of randomisation, assessed using the Modified Marshall Scoring System. Organ failure is defined as a score of ≥2 in any of the three organ systems evaluated: respiratory (PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio), renal (serum creatinine), and cardiovascular (systolic blood pressure). Transient organ failure (resolving within 48 hours) and persistent organ failure (lasting >48 hours) will be recorded separately.
30 days
Unplanned hospital readmission
Periodo de tiempo: 30 days
30 days
ICU admission rate
Periodo de tiempo: 30 days
30 days
Patient satisfaction Assessed by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18)
Periodo de tiempo: 30 days
Patient satisfaction with the allocated management strategy, assessed at the 30-day follow-up visit using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18), a validated 18-item instrument evaluating satisfaction across seven domains: general satisfaction, technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with doctor, and accessibility. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree). Domain scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
30 days

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Center for Traumatology and Major Burns, Ben Arous

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de julio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

28 de febrero de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de marzo de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

8 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

12 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • CTGBA/EC/2025/07-03

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir