- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07655557
Sexual Health Communication Skills Training Intervention for Patients With Prostate Cancer
29 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: NYU Langone Health
Pilot Testing a Sexual Health Communication Skills Training Intervention for Patients With Prostate Cancer
This is a pilot randomized controlled trial of a sexual health communication skills training multimedia intervention (Starting the Conversation [STC] adapted for patients with prostate cancer [PCa]) to improve patients' ability to communicate with providers about their sexual health concerns during PCa care compared to a time and attention control arm.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Aún no reclutando
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
The investigators will conduct a pilot RCT of STC adapted for PCa with 100 patients randomly assigned to the intervention or control arm in a 1:1 ratio.
Primary feasibility outcomes are clinical trial metrics and feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of STC.
Primary efficacy outcomes are self-efficacy for sexual health communication with providers and rates of sexual health communication with providers.
Secondary efficacy outcomes are sexual health outcomes (use of therapies for sexual dysfunction, sexual activity, and sexual satisfaction).
Measures of efficacy will be compared between the intervention and control groups.
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Estimado)
100
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Natasha Gupta, MD
- Número de teléfono: 646-501-2599
- Correo electrónico: Natasha.gupta@nyulangone.org
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10016
- NYU Langone Health
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult male with PCa at least 18 years of age
- Speak English
- Reside in the U.S.
- Have internet/web access, and
- Report current bother due to sexual dysfunction
- Capacity and willingness to provide consent
- Have an appointment with a PCa provider at NYU Langone Health during the study accrual period
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individual with impaired decision-making capacity.
- Participation in another part of this study (prior aim)
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exposure to STC Intervention
Participants will receive a multimedia intervention focused on teaching communication skills to help patients with prostate cancer discuss their sexual health concerns with their healthcare providers.
|
20-minute slideshow, 5-page workbook, 2-page supportive care resource guide focused on sexual health and teaching communication skills to help patients with prostate cancer discuss their sexual health concerns with their healthcare providers.
|
|
Comparador activo: Control Arm
The control arm will be exposed to a 2-page supportive care resource guide, as well as a video slideshow and pamphlet on diet, sleep, and exercise for patients with prostate cancer.
|
2-page supportive care resource guide, as well as a 20-minute video slideshow and 5-page pamphlet on diet, sleep, and exercise for patients with prostate cancer.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Eligibility rate
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
|
Proportion of screened individuals who are eligible
|
Baseline
|
|
Enrollment rate
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
|
Proportion of eligible individuals who enroll
|
Baseline
|
|
Retention rate
Periodo de tiempo: Up to Month 2 Follow-Up
|
Proportion of enrolled participants who are not lost to follow-up
|
Up to Month 2 Follow-Up
|
|
Assessment process
Periodo de tiempo: Up to Month 2 Follow-Up
|
Proportion of participants who completed intervention and assessments
|
Up to Month 2 Follow-Up
|
|
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Periodo de tiempo: Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
FIM is a validated 4-item scale designed to evaluate whether a specific intervention or practice can be successfully implemented and carried out within a given setting.
Each item is rated on a scale from 1-5; the total score is the average of the responses and ranges from 1-5; higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
|
Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
|
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Periodo de tiempo: Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
AIM is a validated 4-item scale used in implementation research to assess stakeholders' perception that a new program, treatment, or practice is agreeable and satisfactory.
Each item is rated on a scale from 1-5; the total score is the average of the responses and ranges from 1-5; a higher overall average indicates a greater level of acceptability for the intervention.
|
Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
|
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Periodo de tiempo: Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a validated, 4-item tool used in implementation science to assess the perceived fit, relevance, and suitability of an intervention.
Each item is rated on scale from 1-5; the total score is the average of responses and ranges from 1-5; higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
|
Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
|
Number of patients who raised a sexual health topic during clinic visit
Periodo de tiempo: Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
|
|
Number of patients who discussed sexual health concerns during clinic visit
Periodo de tiempo: Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
|
|
Number of patients who asked a sexual health question during clinic visit
Periodo de tiempo: Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
Post-Appointment (Day 1)
|
|
|
Self Efficacy - Talking about Sexual Health
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Post-Appointment (Day 1), Month 2 Follow-Up
|
Self-efficacy for talking about sexual health with a healthcare provider, scored from 0-10.
Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, Post-Appointment (Day 1), Month 2 Follow-Up
|
|
Self Efficacy - Asking about Sexual Health
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Post-Appointment (Day 1), Month 2 Follow-Up
|
Self-efficacy for asking a healthcare provider about sexual health, scored from 0-10.
Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, Post-Appointment (Day 1), Month 2 Follow-Up
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure (PROMIS SexFS v2.0)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Post-Appointment (Day 1), Month 2 Follow-Up
|
Questions from the domains of 1) engagement in sexual activity and 2) use of therapeutic aids for sexual activity will be converted into dichotomous variables; proportions will be evaluated at each time point as well as over time using a Z-test for differences in proportions between groups; higher scores indicate greater sexual function and satisfaction.
The domain of global satisfaction with sex life will be assessed as the change over time and compared between groups using two-sample t-tests.
|
Baseline, Post-Appointment (Day 1), Month 2 Follow-Up
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Natasha Gupta, MD, NYU Langone Health
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
1 de agosto de 2026
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
31 de octubre de 2028
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
31 de octubre de 2028
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
11 de junio de 2026
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
11 de junio de 2026
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
18 de junio de 2026
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
1 de julio de 2026
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
29 de junio de 2026
Última verificación
1 de junio de 2026
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 26-00587
- K08CA293275 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
SÍ
Descripción del plan IPD
The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 to 36 months after publication or as required by a condition of awards or supporting agreements, provided the requesting investigator executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health.
Datasets that can be shared will be deposited in open ICPSR.
The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be posted on Clinicaltrials.gov
only as required by federal regulation or supporting awards and agreements.
Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD
Datasets that can be shared will be deposited in open ICPSR.
Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
- SAVIA
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .