Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Function and Psychosocial Sequelae Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

9 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Noemi Moreno-Segura, University of Valencia

Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction, and Psychosocial Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

This observational cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the effects of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on pelvic floor function and psychosocial well-being. The study will assess the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, as well as their impact on quality of life, sexual health, self-esteem, and interpersonal relationships.

Adult men who underwent radical prostatectomy at least one year before enrollment will complete a series of validated questionnaires and provide demographic and clinical information through online surveys or telephone interviews. The study will also explore whether participants received pelvic floor physiotherapy before or after surgery and whether rehabilitation is associated with better functional and psychosocial outcomes. The findings may contribute to a better understanding of the long-term consequences of radical prostatectomy and help identify opportunities to improve patient care.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Inscripción por invitación

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Radical prostatectomy is one of the most common curative treatments for localized prostate cancer. Although surgical techniques have improved over recent decades, urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction remain among the most frequent long-term complications after surgery. These conditions may substantially affect patients' quality of life, sexual health, self-esteem, interpersonal relationships, and psychosocial well-being. Despite the availability of conservative pelvic floor rehabilitation strategies, access to and use of pelvic floor physiotherapy before and after surgery remain variable.

This observational cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the long-term effects of radical prostatectomy on pelvic floor function and psychosocial outcomes in men who underwent surgery at least one year before study participation. Data will be collected through validated patient-reported outcome measures and a structured questionnaire including sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related information.

Participants will be recruited through social media, institutional dissemination, patient networks, and snowball sampling. After providing electronic informed consent, participants will complete the study questionnaires either online or, when digital literacy is limited, through a structured telephone interview conducted by a trained researcher. No interviews will be audio-recorded, and all data will be pseudonymized before analysis.

The primary objectives are to evaluate urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy and to describe their psychosocial consequences. Secondary objectives include determining the proportion of patients who received information about pelvic floor physiotherapy, identifying the proportion who underwent pelvic floor rehabilitation before and/or after surgery, and exploring whether rehabilitation is associated with differences in functional and psychosocial outcomes. The study also aims to improve awareness of pelvic floor rehabilitation as part of the multidisciplinary management of prostate cancer survivors.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

67

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • España
    • Valencia
      • Valencia, Valencia, España, 46010
        • Gascó Oliag, 5

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

The study population will consist of adult men who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer at least 12 months before enrollment. Participants will be recruited from the community through social media, institutional advertisements, patient networks, and snowball sampling. Eligible individuals will voluntarily contact the research team and, after providing electronic informed consent, will complete the study questionnaires online or, when necessary, through a structured telephone interview.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

Male participants aged 18 years or older. History of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, regardless of the surgical technique used.

At least 12 months since radical prostatectomy. Able to understand the study information and provide electronic informed consent.

Able to complete the questionnaires in Spanish, either independently or with the support of a structured telephone interview.

Willing to participate voluntarily in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Presence of comorbidities that may independently contribute to urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction (e.g., neurological disorders or other relevant medical conditions).

Severe cognitive or sensory impairment that prevents understanding the study procedures or completing the questionnaires.

Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
Men aged who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
Men aged ≥18 years who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer at least one year before enrollment.
Otro: Sin intervenciones
Sin intervención

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Erectile dysfunction
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Erectile function assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5). Higher scores indicate better erectile function.
Baseline (single assessment)
Urinary incontinence severity
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Urinary incontinence severity assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity and impact on quality of life.
Baseline (single assessment)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Pelvic floor physiotherapy
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Self-reported information regarding receipt of information about pelvic floor physiotherapy and participation in pelvic floor rehabilitation before and/or after radical prostatectomy.
Baseline (single assessment)
Prostate cancer-specific urinary symptoms and quality of life
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Urinary symptoms and prostate cancer-specific quality of life assessed using the EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaire. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-PR25). Scores for each scale are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden for symptom scales and better functioning for functional scales.
Baseline (single assessment)
Sexual health
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Sexual health assessed using the EORTC Sexual Health Questionnaire (EORTC SH22). Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better sexual functioning for functional scales and worse symptoms or problems for symptom scales.
Baseline (single assessment)
Self-esteem and relationship outcomes
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Self-esteem and relationship functioning assessed using the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire (SEAR).Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better self-esteem and relationship functioning.
Baseline (single assessment)
Health-related quality of life
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Health-related quality of life assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
Baseline (single assessment)
Comfort discussing urinary incontinence
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Participant-rated comfort discussing urinary incontinence using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable to 10 = very comfortable). Higher scores indicate greater comfort.
Baseline (single assessment)
Comfort discussing sexual health
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Participant-rated comfort discussing sexual health using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable to 10 = very comfortable). Higher scores indicate greater comfort.
Baseline (single assessment)
Perceived influence of social taboos
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Perceived influence of social taboos on discussing urinary incontinence and sexual health assessed using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = no influence to 10 = very strong influence). Higher scores indicate greater perceived influence of social taboos.
Baseline (single assessment)
Honesty of questionnaire responses
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (single assessment)
Self-reported honesty when answering questionnaires assessed using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = not honest at all to 10 = completely honest). Higher scores indicate greater perceived honesty.
Baseline (single assessment)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

University of Valencia

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de enero de 2025

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

2 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

9 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

13 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • Prostatectomy_ED

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir