- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07693647
Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Function and Psychosocial Sequelae Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction, and Psychosocial Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
This observational cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the effects of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on pelvic floor function and psychosocial well-being. The study will assess the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, as well as their impact on quality of life, sexual health, self-esteem, and interpersonal relationships.
Adult men who underwent radical prostatectomy at least one year before enrollment will complete a series of validated questionnaires and provide demographic and clinical information through online surveys or telephone interviews. The study will also explore whether participants received pelvic floor physiotherapy before or after surgery and whether rehabilitation is associated with better functional and psychosocial outcomes. The findings may contribute to a better understanding of the long-term consequences of radical prostatectomy and help identify opportunities to improve patient care.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Radical prostatectomy is one of the most common curative treatments for localized prostate cancer. Although surgical techniques have improved over recent decades, urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction remain among the most frequent long-term complications after surgery. These conditions may substantially affect patients' quality of life, sexual health, self-esteem, interpersonal relationships, and psychosocial well-being. Despite the availability of conservative pelvic floor rehabilitation strategies, access to and use of pelvic floor physiotherapy before and after surgery remain variable.
This observational cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the long-term effects of radical prostatectomy on pelvic floor function and psychosocial outcomes in men who underwent surgery at least one year before study participation. Data will be collected through validated patient-reported outcome measures and a structured questionnaire including sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related information.
Participants will be recruited through social media, institutional dissemination, patient networks, and snowball sampling. After providing electronic informed consent, participants will complete the study questionnaires either online or, when digital literacy is limited, through a structured telephone interview conducted by a trained researcher. No interviews will be audio-recorded, and all data will be pseudonymized before analysis.
The primary objectives are to evaluate urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy and to describe their psychosocial consequences. Secondary objectives include determining the proportion of patients who received information about pelvic floor physiotherapy, identifying the proportion who underwent pelvic floor rehabilitation before and/or after surgery, and exploring whether rehabilitation is associated with differences in functional and psychosocial outcomes. The study also aims to improve awareness of pelvic floor rehabilitation as part of the multidisciplinary management of prostate cancer survivors.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Valencia
-
Valencia, Valencia, Espanha, 46010
- Gascó Oliag, 5
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
Male participants aged 18 years or older. History of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, regardless of the surgical technique used.
At least 12 months since radical prostatectomy. Able to understand the study information and provide electronic informed consent.
Able to complete the questionnaires in Spanish, either independently or with the support of a structured telephone interview.
Willing to participate voluntarily in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of comorbidities that may independently contribute to urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction (e.g., neurological disorders or other relevant medical conditions).
Severe cognitive or sensory impairment that prevents understanding the study procedures or completing the questionnaires.
Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Men aged who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
Men aged ≥18 years who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer at least one year before enrollment.
|
Sem intervenção
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Erectile dysfunction
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Erectile function assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5).
Higher scores indicate better erectile function.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
|
Urinary incontinence severity
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Urinary incontinence severity assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF).
Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity and impact on quality of life.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Pelvic floor physiotherapy
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Self-reported information regarding receipt of information about pelvic floor physiotherapy and participation in pelvic floor rehabilitation before and/or after radical prostatectomy.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
|
Prostate cancer-specific urinary symptoms and quality of life
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Urinary symptoms and prostate cancer-specific quality of life assessed using the EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaire.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-PR25).
Scores for each scale are transformed to a 0-100 scale.
Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden for symptom scales and better functioning for functional scales.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
|
Sexual health
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Sexual health assessed using the EORTC Sexual Health Questionnaire (EORTC SH22).
Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale.
Higher scores indicate better sexual functioning for functional scales and worse symptoms or problems for symptom scales.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
|
Self-esteem and relationship outcomes
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Self-esteem and relationship functioning assessed using the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire (SEAR).Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better self-esteem and relationship functioning.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
|
Health-related quality of life
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Health-related quality of life assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36).
Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
|
Comfort discussing urinary incontinence
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Participant-rated comfort discussing urinary incontinence using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable to 10 = very comfortable).
Higher scores indicate greater comfort.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
|
Comfort discussing sexual health
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Participant-rated comfort discussing sexual health using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable to 10 = very comfortable).
Higher scores indicate greater comfort.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
|
Perceived influence of social taboos
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Perceived influence of social taboos on discussing urinary incontinence and sexual health assessed using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = no influence to 10 = very strong influence).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived influence of social taboos.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
|
Honesty of questionnaire responses
Prazo: Baseline (single assessment)
|
Self-reported honesty when answering questionnaires assessed using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = not honest at all to 10 = completely honest).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived honesty.
|
Baseline (single assessment)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
- Doenças urogenitais
- Doenças Genitais
- Transtornos Mentais, Desordem Mental
- Neoplasias Genitais Masculinas
- Neoplasias urogenitais
- Neoplasias por local
- Neoplasias
- Doenças Genitais, Masculino
- Doenças prostáticas
- Doenças Urogenitais Masculinas
- Doenças Urológicas
- Doenças Urogenitais Femininas
- Doenças urogenitais femininas e complicações na gravidez
- Distúrbios da micção
- Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior
- Manifestações Urológicas
- Neoplasias por Tipo Histológico
- Neoplasias Glandulares e Epiteliais
- Carcinoma
- Disfunção Sexual Fisiológica
- Disfunções Sexuais, Psicológicas
- Condições Patológicas, Sinais e Sintomas
- Sinais e sintomas
- Neoplasias prostáticas
- Incontinencia urinaria
- Adenocarcinoma
- Disfunção erétil
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- Prostatectomy_ED
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .