Pain Detecting and Analgesic Stimulating Device on Low Back Pain
8 janvier 2016 mis à jour par: Jo Nijs, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
The Effects of a Pain Detecting and Analgesic Stimulating Device on Low Back Pain Patients' Clinical Outcomes
Purpose of study is to test in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) the effects of the Nervomatrix device on various clinical outcomes of patients with low back pain, as well as its mechanisms of action.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
This will be a matched randomized-controlled trial - RCT.
Using random numbers from a random number generator, pairs of patients will be randomized to either the Nervomatrix stimulation (experimental group) or to sham stimulation (controls).
Matching of pairs will be done based on the baseline data of the primary outcomes - pain and disability, as well as on other treatments received.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
39
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Brussel, Belgique, 1050
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans à 65 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- chronic low back pain persisting for at least 3 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- patho-anatomical diagnosis (such as fractures, tumors, rheumatic diseases and neurological diseases)
- initiated a new conventional therapy during the study period
- pregnant
- patients having a cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, or other implanted metallic or electronic device
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Double
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Stimulation
Patients will undergo 6 sessions, each including 20 minutes of stimulation.
These are given after the Nervomatrix device determines the peak pain regions for each patient, and selects to stimulate the top 10 regions with least skin resistance.
The frequency of stimulation is 8Hz, at an intensity matched for each patient's tolerance, without inflicting any pain.
The location of the stimulations will change in accordance to the changes in the peak pain regions, reflecting changes in tissue physiology possibly linked to clinical improvements.
|
The Nervomatrix device first measures skin impedance, and then creates a digital pain matrix map of the back.
Regions with low resistance are then selected for brief electric stimulation, thus targeting the treatment to specific peak pain regions.
Preliminary evidence supports the effectiveness of this device in reducing pain and disability over 6 sessions
Autres noms:
|
|
Comparateur factice: sham stimulation
Patients will undergo 6 sessions, each including 20 minutesof sham stimulation (no stimulation).
These are given after the Nervomatrix device determines the peak pain regions for each patient, and selects to stimulate the top 10 regions with least skin resistance.
|
The Nervomatrix device first measures skin impedance, and then creates a digital pain matrix map of the back.
Regions with low resistance are then selected for brief mechanical pressure.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
The change in the amount of steps climbed during one minute
Délai: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Stair climbing: Participants were asked to climb up and down 5 stairs for 1 minute, using the rail for support if required.
The total amount of steps climbed will be recorded
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
The change in central sensitization inventory
Délai: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Part A of 25 statements related to current health symptoms.
Each of these items is measured on a 5-point temporal Likert scale, with the following numeric rating scale: never (0), rarely (1), sometimes (2), often (3), and always (4).
A cumulative score ranges from 0 to 100.
Additionally information is collected in Part B on previously diagnosed central sensitivity syndromes and related conditions.
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Délai: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
will be used to assess pain catastrophizing.
It consists of 13 items describing different thoughts and feelings that individuals may experience when they are experiencing pain.
Items are scored on a 5-point scale, and total scores are counted by adding up all individual items scores.
Higher scores correspond to more severe catastrophic thoughts about pain.
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in revised Illness perception questionnaire
Délai: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
will be used for assessing the patients' illness perceptions, as it is known that patients with maladaptive illness perceptions (e.g.
expecting that their back problem will last for a long time, or holding weak beliefs in the controllability of their back problem) are more likely to have poor clinical outcomes 6 months after they consulted their physician
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in average pain intensity
Délai: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
average pain rating in the last seven days using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
Délai: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
This questionnaire consists of 20 activity related questions which the patient has to score on a six points scale (0= no; 5= not capable to perform the activity).
The total score represents a percentage of functional limitations the patient experiences during daily life.
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Délai: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a 17-item questionnaire developed to measure the fear of movement and (re)injury.
Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" [1] to "strongly agree" [4].
Ratings are added up to give a total score ranging from 17-68 points, with the higher values reflecting greater fear of (re)injury
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
1 décembre 2013
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
1 décembre 2014
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
1 février 2015
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
13 décembre 2013
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
2 octobre 2014
Première publication (Estimation)
3 octobre 2014
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)
12 janvier 2016
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
8 janvier 2016
Dernière vérification
1 janvier 2016
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- NeMaLBP
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .