Pain Detecting and Analgesic Stimulating Device on Low Back Pain
8 de janeiro de 2016 atualizado por: Jo Nijs, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
The Effects of a Pain Detecting and Analgesic Stimulating Device on Low Back Pain Patients' Clinical Outcomes
Purpose of study is to test in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) the effects of the Nervomatrix device on various clinical outcomes of patients with low back pain, as well as its mechanisms of action.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
This will be a matched randomized-controlled trial - RCT.
Using random numbers from a random number generator, pairs of patients will be randomized to either the Nervomatrix stimulation (experimental group) or to sham stimulation (controls).
Matching of pairs will be done based on the baseline data of the primary outcomes - pain and disability, as well as on other treatments received.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
39
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Brussel, Bélgica, 1050
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos a 65 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- chronic low back pain persisting for at least 3 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- patho-anatomical diagnosis (such as fractures, tumors, rheumatic diseases and neurological diseases)
- initiated a new conventional therapy during the study period
- pregnant
- patients having a cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, or other implanted metallic or electronic device
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Dobro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Stimulation
Patients will undergo 6 sessions, each including 20 minutes of stimulation.
These are given after the Nervomatrix device determines the peak pain regions for each patient, and selects to stimulate the top 10 regions with least skin resistance.
The frequency of stimulation is 8Hz, at an intensity matched for each patient's tolerance, without inflicting any pain.
The location of the stimulations will change in accordance to the changes in the peak pain regions, reflecting changes in tissue physiology possibly linked to clinical improvements.
|
The Nervomatrix device first measures skin impedance, and then creates a digital pain matrix map of the back.
Regions with low resistance are then selected for brief electric stimulation, thus targeting the treatment to specific peak pain regions.
Preliminary evidence supports the effectiveness of this device in reducing pain and disability over 6 sessions
Outros nomes:
|
|
Comparador Falso: sham stimulation
Patients will undergo 6 sessions, each including 20 minutesof sham stimulation (no stimulation).
These are given after the Nervomatrix device determines the peak pain regions for each patient, and selects to stimulate the top 10 regions with least skin resistance.
|
The Nervomatrix device first measures skin impedance, and then creates a digital pain matrix map of the back.
Regions with low resistance are then selected for brief mechanical pressure.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
The change in the amount of steps climbed during one minute
Prazo: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Stair climbing: Participants were asked to climb up and down 5 stairs for 1 minute, using the rail for support if required.
The total amount of steps climbed will be recorded
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
The change in central sensitization inventory
Prazo: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Part A of 25 statements related to current health symptoms.
Each of these items is measured on a 5-point temporal Likert scale, with the following numeric rating scale: never (0), rarely (1), sometimes (2), often (3), and always (4).
A cumulative score ranges from 0 to 100.
Additionally information is collected in Part B on previously diagnosed central sensitivity syndromes and related conditions.
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Prazo: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
will be used to assess pain catastrophizing.
It consists of 13 items describing different thoughts and feelings that individuals may experience when they are experiencing pain.
Items are scored on a 5-point scale, and total scores are counted by adding up all individual items scores.
Higher scores correspond to more severe catastrophic thoughts about pain.
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in revised Illness perception questionnaire
Prazo: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
will be used for assessing the patients' illness perceptions, as it is known that patients with maladaptive illness perceptions (e.g.
expecting that their back problem will last for a long time, or holding weak beliefs in the controllability of their back problem) are more likely to have poor clinical outcomes 6 months after they consulted their physician
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in average pain intensity
Prazo: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
average pain rating in the last seven days using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
Prazo: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
This questionnaire consists of 20 activity related questions which the patient has to score on a six points scale (0= no; 5= not capable to perform the activity).
The total score represents a percentage of functional limitations the patient experiences during daily life.
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
|
The change in Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Prazo: measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a 17-item questionnaire developed to measure the fear of movement and (re)injury.
Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" [1] to "strongly agree" [4].
Ratings are added up to give a total score ranging from 17-68 points, with the higher values reflecting greater fear of (re)injury
|
measured prior to the first treatment session (baseline) and immediately following the 6th treatment session (after three weeks)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
1 de dezembro de 2013
Conclusão Primária (Real)
1 de dezembro de 2014
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
1 de fevereiro de 2015
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
13 de dezembro de 2013
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
2 de outubro de 2014
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
3 de outubro de 2014
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)
12 de janeiro de 2016
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
8 de janeiro de 2016
Última verificação
1 de janeiro de 2016
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- NeMaLBP
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .