Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Effects of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Task Specific Training With Visual Feedback in Post Stroke Patients

4 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Riphah International University

Effects of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Task Specific Training With Visual Feedback on Lower Limb on Balance, Gait and Sensation in Post Stroke Patients

This study will be a single blinded randomized controlled trail. Non probability convenience sampling will be used to recruit the patients of either gender, aged 40-65 years, patients with the subacute phase (>3months post stroke) and able to follow the instructions. This study will be carried out in Gulab Devi Hospital and Sahet Medical Complex Lahore. These participants will be randomly allocated to Group A will receive bilateral task specific training with visual feedback, whereas Group B will receive unilateral task specific training with visual feedback. Both group will perform their respective exercises 40 minutes, five days a week for 6weeks. The Participants will be evaluated at the start and end of the exercise program through Berg Balance scale to assess balance, 10 Meter Walk Test to assess gait and Fugl Meyer Assessment of lower extremity to assess sensation. Data will be analyzed by SPSS version 27.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Stroke is a neurological deficit due to vascular lesion. It occur due to blood flow obstruction and by the rupture of blood vessels. It causes neurological damage such as weakness, numbness, impaired balance, gait and loss of proprioception. These impairment lead to decrease mobility, increase risk of fall and reduce the quality of life. Task specific training focus on repetitive practice with meaningful, goal directed task to facilitate motor relearning. Visual feedback promote motor recovery and brain plasticity. Task specific training with visual feedback has been shown to enhance motor relearning and sensory integration. However most rehabilitation program focus only the affected limb. The aim of this study is to determine effects of unilateral versus bilateral task specific training with visual feedback on lower limb on balance, gait and sensation in post stroke patients.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

50

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Lahore, Pakistan, 54000
        • Department of Physical Therapy, Sahet Medical complex Lahore

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 40-65 years
  • Both gender male and female
  • Pre diagnose with the Stroke
  • Patient with a subacute phase (>3months post stroke)
  • Ability to understand and follow the instructions (8)
  • Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score between 21-40
  • 10 meter walk test (0.4-0.8m/s)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive Impairment
  • Visual and vestibular Impairment
  • Other orthopedic or neurological disorder
  • unilateral neglect

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: bilateral task specific training with visual feedback
The group will received bilateral task specific training along with visual feedback on lower limb. Bilateral training is used in rehabilitation to promote functional recovery of impaired limbs by engaging both affected and non-affected sides. Task specific training include weight shifting, sit to stand, stepping forward / lateral and bilateral walking over uneven surfaces. Visual feedback will be given by mirrors and visual targets place on the floor. Visual feedback helping patients to improve balance and body awareness, particularly for individuals with sensory or motor impairments following a stroke. Bilateral task specific training with visual feedback will perform for five days per week for six weeks. The participants in this group underwent 40 minutes of bilateral lower limb training. Pre and post intervention values will be recorded to assess the effectiveness
Expérimental: unilateral task specific training with visual feedback
This group received unilateral task specific training with visual feedback on affected limb. Task specific training include weight shifting, seated marching, stepping forward / lateral, and walk on uneven surface. Unilateral task specific training with visual feedback will perform for five days per week for six weeks. The participants in this group underwent 40 minutes of unilateral lower limb training. Pre and post intervention values will be recorded to assess the effectiveness.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Berg Balance Scale
Délai: 6 weeks

Berg balance (BBG) is a widely used clinical test to assess a person's static and dynamic balance abilities. It consist of 14 performance based tasks each scored on a 5 point scale from 0 to 4 for a maximum total score of 56. It used for individuals with balance impairments such as post stroke patients.

In scoring criteria 4 score perform task independently and safely, 3 score perform with supervision or slight assistance, 2 score perform with moderate assistance or deviation, 1score perform with major assistance and 0 score unable to perform The scoring range 41-56 low risk balance impairment, 21-40 moderate risk balance impairment and 0-20 high risk balance impairment Test retest (ICC =0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) and inter-rater (ICC=0.93; 95% CI, 0.87=0.97) reliability was excellent

6 weeks
Meter Walk Test (TMWT)
Délai: 6 weeks
10 meter walk test is use to assess the gait and gait speed over a short distance. It is an important predictor of functional independence, fall risk and community mobility. It is perform by the patient to walk a total 14 meter at a comfortable speed, only the middle 10 meter are timed to eliminate acceleration and deceleration bias. First 2 meter acceleration, middle 10 meter time walking and last 2 meter deceleration. Repeat the test twice. The Scoring of 10 meter walk test have predicted values, gait speed < 0.4 m/ s functional status (household ambulation), 0.4 - 0.8 m/s limited community ambulation, > 0.8 m/s community ambulation and > 1.2 m/s safe for crossing the street
6 weeks
Fugl- Meyer Assessment - Lower Extremity
Délai: 06 weeks

Fugl Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity is widely used outcome tool to measure in rehabilitation, particularly for stroke patients.

To measure the sensation, it include light touch sensation and proprioception. The scoring criteria each item is on a 3 point scale; 0 unable to perform the task, 1 impaired and 2 normal. The total score ranges from 0 to 10. Light touch 2 sites and 2 points total score 4. Proprioception 3 joints 2 points total score 6

06 weeks

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Zain Ul Abbas, Ms, Riphah International University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 juillet 2025

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 mai 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juillet 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

4 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

4 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

8 mai 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

8 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

4 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner