- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07595211
Apically Positioned Flap vs Rolled Flap for Soft Tissue Management During Implant Second-Stage Surgery
Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Management During Second-Stage Surgery With Two Different Flap Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Study
Patients are being asked to consider joining a research study that looks at two different ways dentists uncover dental implants during a small gum surgery. To join this study, Patients must have two dental implants that are ready to be uncovered. Both uncovering methods used in this research are normal, safe procedures that dentists already use every day. The purpose of this study is to learn which method helps the gums heal better, stay thicker, and look more natural over time.
If patients decide to participate, the dentist will use one method on one implant and the other method on the second implant so we can compare how each implant heals. The study lasts about one year and includes the uncovering surgery plus scheduled follow-up visits. At these visits, the dentist will gently measure your gums, take pictures, take routine dental X-rays, and use a small camera scanner to check how the gum tissue changes. Patients will also be asked to rate any pain or swelling after surgery.
Patients may have soreness, swelling, or minor bleeding-these are the same risks patients would have during normal implant care. Patients may or may not personally benefit, but the extra monitoring may help us track the healing closely, and patients' participation can help dentists improve care for future patients.
Patients can receive regular implant treatment without joining the study. The goal of this summary is to help you think about the pros and cons and decide what feels right for patients.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Olivia Bodnar, DDS
- Numéro de téléphone: 6142924641
- E-mail: bodnar.61@buckeyemail.osu.edu
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Guo-Liang Cheng, DDS, MS
- Numéro de téléphone: 6142924641
- E-mail: cheng.712@osu.edu
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between the ages of 18-80.
- Non-smokers or former smokers with at least a 5-year successful cessation history.
- Patients with normal systemic health (ASA-I) or well-controlled/stable systemic conditions (ASA-II), such as diabetes with HbA1c < 7.0%, no recent acute myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accidents within 6 months, or any contraindication for periodontal or implant surgery.
- Patients who had, or plan to have, 2 non-adjacent implants of the same system placed under a two-stage implant protocol.
- The diameter discrepancy of the 2 target implants must be less than 1 mm.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current smokers, or smokers who have quit <5 years prior to study entry.
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients with substance or alcohol abuse
- Patients with a history of antiresorptive therapy, head and neck radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for malignant tumors
- Other systemic conditions or medication affecting wound healing.
- Poor plaque control with plaque score > 20%
- Active/untreated odontogenic and periodontal infections
- Implants placed, or planned to be placed, with one-stage implant protocol.
- The diameter discrepancy of the 2 target implants is equal to or greater than 1 mm (≥ 1 mm).
- Implants showing signs of early peri-implant bone loss or infection.
- Severe loss of keratinized tissue (> 50%) at the implant site
- Non-English speaking individuals for studies involving informed consent.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Tripler
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Comparateur actif: Apically Positioned Flap (APF)
During implant second-stage surgery, a crestal incision with vertical releases is used to elevate a flap that is repositioned apically and buccally to increase the width of keratinized tissue around the implant, followed by placement of a healing abutment and suturing.
|
A flap design used during implant second-stage surgery in which a crestal incision with vertical releases is performed, and the flap is repositioned apically and buccally to increase the width of keratinized tissue around the implant.
|
|
Expérimental: Rolled Flap Technique (RFT)
During implant second-stage surgery, a full-thickness flap is elevated, and a pedicled connective tissue portion is de-epithelialized and rolled toward the buccal aspect to increase peri-implant soft tissue thickness, followed by placement of a healing abutment and suturing.
|
A flap design used during implant second-stage surgery in which a pedicled connective tissue portion of the flap is de-epithelialized and rolled toward the buccal aspect to increase peri-implant soft tissue thickness.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Keratinized Tissue Width
Délai: Baseline (second-stage surgery) to 12 months after surgery
|
Keratinized tissue width will be measured clinically in millimeters at the mid-buccal aspect of the implant using a periodontal probe at prespecified follow-up visits.
|
Baseline (second-stage surgery) to 12 months after surgery
|
|
Change in Peri-Implant Mucosal Thickness
Délai: Baseline (second-stage surgery) to 12 months after surgery
|
Peri-implant mucosal thickness will be assessed by superimposing serial intraoral scan data to quantify changes in buccal soft tissue thickness at implant sites over time.
|
Baseline (second-stage surgery) to 12 months after surgery
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Pink Esthetic Score (PES)
Délai: 3, 6, and 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
Peri-implant soft tissue esthetics will be evaluated using the Pink Esthetic Score based on standardized clinical photographs, assessing papilla, tissue contour, color, and texture.
|
3, 6, and 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
|
Change in Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Volume
Délai: Baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
Three-dimensional soft tissue volume changes will be quantified by superimposing serial intraoral scan data obtained at baseline and follow-up visits.
|
Baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
|
Early Wound Healing Index
Délai: 1 and 2 weeks after second-stage surgery
|
Early wound healing will be assessed using a standardized healing index based on tissue color, bleeding, granulation tissue, and epithelialization.
|
1 and 2 weeks after second-stage surgery
|
|
Plaque Index (PI)
Délai: 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
Oral hygiene status will be assessed using the plaque index based on clinical examination at peri-implant sites.
|
1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
|
Modified Sulcular Bleeding Index (mSBI)
Délai: 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
Peri-implant soft tissue inflammation will be assessed using the modified sulcular bleeding index during clinical examination.
|
1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
|
Postoperative Pain Score
Délai: 1 and 2 weeks after second-stage surgery
|
Participant-reported pain will be measured using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100), where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
1 and 2 weeks after second-stage surgery
|
|
Postoperative Swelling Score
Délai: 1 and 2 weeks after second-stage surgery
|
Participant-reported swelling will be assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100), where higher scores indicate greater perceived swelling.
|
1 and 2 weeks after second-stage surgery
|
|
Change in Peri-Implant Bone Level
Délai: Baseline to 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
Peri-implant marginal bone levels will be assessed using standardized periapical radiographs and compared between baseline and follow-up.
|
Baseline to 12 months after second-stage surgery
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- STUDY20252723
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .