Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Roods vs PNF for Upper Limb Function in Acute MCA Stroke (RVP-MCA)

23 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Dr. Marium Zafar, University of Faisalabad

Comparison Between Roods Facilitatory Techniques and Sequential PNF Pattern on Upper Limb Function in Acute Phase of Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Patients

Middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke often causes weakness or stiffness in the arm and hand, making daily activities difficult. This study compares two physical therapy approaches - Rood's facilitatory techniques (using touch, quick stretch, and ice to activate muscles) and PNF sequential patterns (using diagonal movement patterns) - to improve arm function in acute stroke patients. Both groups will also receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). A total of 28 patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups and receive treatment three times per week for eight weeks. Arm function will be measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and muscle stiffness will be measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale before and after treatment.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

This is a single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. The study will be conducted at three settings in Faisalabad, Pakistan: Allied Hospital, Madinah Teaching Hospital, and Shahid Heera's Health Clinic. Adult patients (≥18 years) with CT or MRI-confirmed MCA stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), mild to moderate upper limb motor dysfunction (MRC ≥2), and cognitive competence (MoCA ≥19) will be included. Exclusion criteria include severe comorbidities, fixed contractures, severe cognitive impairment, skin contraindications to sensory stimulation, and inability to provide consent. A sample size of 28 participants (14 per group) was calculated using Rao soft app based on previous literature. Participants will be randomly assigned using a computer-generated sequence. The single-blind design keeps participants unaware of group allocation. Group A receives NMES followed by Rood's facilitatory techniques: quick stretch before or during movement to activate muscle spindles, tactile stimulation (light stroking) over the muscle belly for 10-20 seconds, and icing for 5-7 seconds on the tendon or muscle surface immediately preceding activation. Group B receives NMES followed by PNF sequential training using conventional upper limb diagonal functional patterns (D1 and D2). PNF techniques include rhythmic initiation, dynamic reversals, repetitive contractions, and combination of isotonic contractions with moderate resistance, performing 8-12 repetitions per pattern over 20-30 minutes per session. NMES parameters: biphasic waveform at 30-40Hz frequency with pulse duration of 200-300μs, producing comfortable visible contraction, administered for 30 minutes per session. Both groups receive interventions three times per week for eight weeks. Outcome measures: Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE, score range 0-66) measures motor function; Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS, score range 0-4) measures muscle tone. Assessments are conducted at baseline and post-intervention by a qualified physiotherapist. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 22.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

28

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Punjab Province
      • Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 3800
        • The University of Faisalabad

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (40-60 years) with confirmed MCA stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) on neuroimaging (CT or MRI)
  • Mild to moderate upper limb motor dysfunction with MRC ≥2 for proximal limb motor strength
  • Cognitive competence to understand instructions (MoCA ≥19 or equivalent)
  • First stroke, acute or subacute phase
  • Willingness to provide written informed consent
  • Both male and female genders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe coexisting medical disorders (heart, liver, kidney failure; malignant tumors)
  • Fixed musculoskeletal abnormalities or contracture in affected upper limb
  • Severe cognitive impairment or aphasia preventing adherence or consent (MMSE below threshold)
  • Skin sores, ulcers, or hypersensitivity (e.g., to cold) contraindicated for sensory stimulation
  • Refusal or inability to give informed consent

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Rood's Facilitatory Techniques Group
Participants receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) followed by Rood's facilitatory techniques including quick stretch, tactile stimulation for 10-20 seconds over muscle belly, and icing for 5-7 seconds on tendon or muscle surface. Interventions delivered three times per week for eight weeks.
Biphasic waveform NMES at 30-40Hz frequency with pulse duration of 200-300μs, producing comfortable but visible muscle contraction. Applied to affected upper limb for 30 minutes per session, three times per week for eight weeks.
Quick stretch applied before or during movement to activate muscle spindles; tactile stimulation (light stroking) over muscle belly for 10-20 seconds; icing for 5-7 seconds on tendon or muscle surface immediately preceding activation. Applied three times per week for eight weeks following NMES.
Comparateur actif: PNF Sequential Pattern Group
Participants receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) followed by PNF sequential training with upper limb diagonal functional patterns (D1 and D2), including rhythmic initiation, dynamic reversals, repetitive contractions, and isotonic contractions with moderate resistance (8-12 repetitions per pattern over 20-30 minutes). Interventions delivered three times per week for eight weeks.
Biphasic waveform NMES at 30-40Hz frequency with pulse duration of 200-300μs, producing comfortable but visible muscle contraction. Applied to affected upper limb for 30 minutes per session, three times per week for eight weeks.
PNF sequential training with upper limb diagonal functional patterns (D1 and D2). Techniques include rhythmic initiation, dynamic reversals, repetitive contractions, and combination of isotonic contractions with moderate resistance according to patient's capabilities. Each session includes 8-12 repetitions per pattern over 20-30 minutes, three times per week for eight weeks.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Upper Limb Motor Function
Délai: Baseline and 8 weeks (post-intervention)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). A standardized 66-point scale assessing motor recovery after stroke based on Brunnstrom stages. Evaluates shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, and coordination functions. Higher scores indicate better motor function.
Baseline and 8 weeks (post-intervention)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Muscle Tone
Délai: Baseline and 8 weeks (post-intervention)
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). A 5-point scale (0-4) measuring resistance during passive stretching of the affected upper limb muscles. 0 = normal tone; 4 = rigidity. Assesses spasticity reduction.
Baseline and 8 weeks (post-intervention)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 janvier 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

15 juin 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

15 juillet 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

23 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

23 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

1 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

1 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

23 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

S'abonner