Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Perioperative Respiratory Function in Sleeve Gastrectomy

1 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Taner Abdullah, Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University

Perioperative Oxygenation and Respiratory Function in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This retrospective single-center cohort study aims to evaluate the effects of two intraoperative ventilation strategies on perioperative oxygenation and respiratory outcomes in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Patients were managed using standardized anesthetic and ventilatory protocols with volume-controlled ventilation and fixed inspired oxygen fraction (FiO₂ 45%). The study compares conventional ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH₂O versus a protective ventilation strategy consisting of PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with repeated recruitment maneuvers performed after pneumoperitoneum establishment and before extubation. Perioperative oxygenation is assessed using serial PaO₂/FiO₂ measurements obtained immediately after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum establishment, and after extubation. Secondary outcomes include perioperative arterial blood gas variables, postoperative spirometric parameters, lactate levels, ICU admission, and hospital length of stay. The study aims to determine whether escalation of intraoperative ventilatory support provides incremental respiratory benefit in contemporary bariatric anesthesia practice.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Obesity is associated with substantial alterations in respiratory physiology, including reduced functional residual capacity, decreased respiratory compliance, impaired diaphragmatic excursion, and increased susceptibility to perioperative atelectasis and hypoxemia. These physiologic changes become more pronounced during general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery because of positive-pressure ventilation and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Consequently, obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery represent a particularly vulnerable population for perioperative respiratory impairment.

Lung-protective ventilation strategies incorporating low tidal volume ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and recruitment maneuvers have been increasingly utilized in obese surgical patients to improve oxygenation and reduce atelectatic changes. However, despite improvements in intraoperative respiratory mechanics and oxygenation reported in previous studies, the clinical significance and incremental benefit of intensified ventilation strategies remain uncertain, particularly in contemporary bariatric anesthesia settings where protective ventilation principles are already routinely applied.

This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluates perioperative oxygenation and respiratory outcomes in obese patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between January 2021 and January 2026. All patients were managed using standardized anesthetic and surgical protocols, including volume-controlled ventilation with tidal volumes of 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight and fixed inspired oxygen fraction (FiO₂ 45%).

Patients were divided into two groups according to intraoperative ventilation strategy. The first group received conventional ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH₂O without recruitment maneuvers. The second group received a protective ventilation strategy consisting of PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with repeated recruitment maneuvers performed after pneumoperitoneum establishment and before extubation.

Perioperative oxygenation was assessed using serial PaO₂/FiO₂ measurements obtained immediately after endotracheal intubation (T0), 10 minutes after pneumoperitoneum establishment (T1), and 5 minutes after extubation (T2). Secondary outcomes included arterial blood gas variables, postoperative spirometric parameters, lactate levels, intensive care unit admission, and hospital length of stay.

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether escalation from conventional PEEP 5 cmH₂O ventilation to PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with recruitment maneuvers provides incremental perioperative respiratory benefit in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy within a standardized contemporary bariatric anesthesia setting.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

53

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Istanbul, Turquie (Türkiye)
        • Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III who underwent elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • revision bariatric surgery
  • gastric bypass surgery
  • conversion to open surgery
  • incomplete perioperative records
  • missing arterial blood gas measurements
  • unavailable postoperative pulmonary function tests

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: PEEP 5/no recruitment maneuver
Patients were ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O without recruitment maneuvers
Patients were ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O without recruitment maneuvers
Autre: PEEP 8/recruitment maneuver
Patients received a protective ventilation strategy consisting of PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with repeated recruitment maneuvers performed after pneumoperitoneum insufflation and before extubation
Recruitment maneuvers were performed using a stepwise PEEP increase strategy. PEEP levels were gradually increased over consecutive respiratory cycles up to 15-20 cmH₂O and subsequently reduced to the assigned maintenance PEEP level.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
PaO2/FiO2 ratio
Délai: T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte
The primary outcome of the study was perioperative oxygenation assessed by serial PaO2/FiO2 ratio measurements.
T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Postoperative pulmonary function tests
Délai: Were evaluated before the surgery and on the day of hospital discharge
forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio
Were evaluated before the surgery and on the day of hospital discharge
Intensive care unit admission
Délai: Postoperative day 0
Patients requiring intensive care admission
Postoperative day 0
PaCO₂, pH, oxygen saturation
Délai: T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte
Blood gas analyses parameters
T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte
Hospital length of stay
Délai: On which day the patients were discharged
How many days did the patient stay in the hospital?
On which day the patients were discharged

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 avril 2026

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

15 avril 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

20 mai 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

22 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

1 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

5 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

5 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

1 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner