Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Perioperative Respiratory Function in Sleeve Gastrectomy

1 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Taner Abdullah, Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University

Perioperative Oxygenation and Respiratory Function in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This retrospective single-center cohort study aims to evaluate the effects of two intraoperative ventilation strategies on perioperative oxygenation and respiratory outcomes in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Patients were managed using standardized anesthetic and ventilatory protocols with volume-controlled ventilation and fixed inspired oxygen fraction (FiO₂ 45%). The study compares conventional ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH₂O versus a protective ventilation strategy consisting of PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with repeated recruitment maneuvers performed after pneumoperitoneum establishment and before extubation. Perioperative oxygenation is assessed using serial PaO₂/FiO₂ measurements obtained immediately after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum establishment, and after extubation. Secondary outcomes include perioperative arterial blood gas variables, postoperative spirometric parameters, lactate levels, ICU admission, and hospital length of stay. The study aims to determine whether escalation of intraoperative ventilatory support provides incremental respiratory benefit in contemporary bariatric anesthesia practice.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Obesity is associated with substantial alterations in respiratory physiology, including reduced functional residual capacity, decreased respiratory compliance, impaired diaphragmatic excursion, and increased susceptibility to perioperative atelectasis and hypoxemia. These physiologic changes become more pronounced during general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery because of positive-pressure ventilation and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Consequently, obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery represent a particularly vulnerable population for perioperative respiratory impairment.

Lung-protective ventilation strategies incorporating low tidal volume ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and recruitment maneuvers have been increasingly utilized in obese surgical patients to improve oxygenation and reduce atelectatic changes. However, despite improvements in intraoperative respiratory mechanics and oxygenation reported in previous studies, the clinical significance and incremental benefit of intensified ventilation strategies remain uncertain, particularly in contemporary bariatric anesthesia settings where protective ventilation principles are already routinely applied.

This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluates perioperative oxygenation and respiratory outcomes in obese patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between January 2021 and January 2026. All patients were managed using standardized anesthetic and surgical protocols, including volume-controlled ventilation with tidal volumes of 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight and fixed inspired oxygen fraction (FiO₂ 45%).

Patients were divided into two groups according to intraoperative ventilation strategy. The first group received conventional ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH₂O without recruitment maneuvers. The second group received a protective ventilation strategy consisting of PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with repeated recruitment maneuvers performed after pneumoperitoneum establishment and before extubation.

Perioperative oxygenation was assessed using serial PaO₂/FiO₂ measurements obtained immediately after endotracheal intubation (T0), 10 minutes after pneumoperitoneum establishment (T1), and 5 minutes after extubation (T2). Secondary outcomes included arterial blood gas variables, postoperative spirometric parameters, lactate levels, intensive care unit admission, and hospital length of stay.

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether escalation from conventional PEEP 5 cmH₂O ventilation to PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with recruitment maneuvers provides incremental perioperative respiratory benefit in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy within a standardized contemporary bariatric anesthesia setting.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

53

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III who underwent elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • revision bariatric surgery
  • gastric bypass surgery
  • conversion to open surgery
  • incomplete perioperative records
  • missing arterial blood gas measurements
  • unavailable postoperative pulmonary function tests

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Otro: PEEP 5/no recruitment maneuver
Patients were ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O without recruitment maneuvers
Patients were ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O without recruitment maneuvers
Otro: PEEP 8/recruitment maneuver
Patients received a protective ventilation strategy consisting of PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with repeated recruitment maneuvers performed after pneumoperitoneum insufflation and before extubation
Recruitment maneuvers were performed using a stepwise PEEP increase strategy. PEEP levels were gradually increased over consecutive respiratory cycles up to 15-20 cmH₂O and subsequently reduced to the assigned maintenance PEEP level.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
PaO2/FiO2 ratio
Periodo de tiempo: T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte
The primary outcome of the study was perioperative oxygenation assessed by serial PaO2/FiO2 ratio measurements.
T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Postoperative pulmonary function tests
Periodo de tiempo: Were evaluated before the surgery and on the day of hospital discharge
forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio
Were evaluated before the surgery and on the day of hospital discharge
Intensive care unit admission
Periodo de tiempo: Postoperative day 0
Patients requiring intensive care admission
Postoperative day 0
PaCO₂, pH, oxygen saturation
Periodo de tiempo: T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte
Blood gas analyses parameters
T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte
Hospital length of stay
Periodo de tiempo: On which day the patients were discharged
How many days did the patient stay in the hospital?
On which day the patients were discharged

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de abril de 2026

Finalización primaria (Actual)

15 de abril de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

20 de mayo de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

22 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

5 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

5 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir