Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Combined Ultrasound and Upper Lip Bite Test Assessment of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients

10 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Makarious Morris Aboelkheir Shenouda, Cairo University

Ultrasound-Measured Hyomental Distance Ratio Combined With the Upper Lip Bite Test as a Predictor of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, regarding:

  • Correlation of HMDR-ULBT values with Cormack-Lehane grades during laryngoscopy.
  • Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Airway management is a cornerstone of safe anesthesia practice. Difficult laryngoscopy and intubation remain a critical challenge for anesthesiologists. The ability to predict difficult airway situations preoperatively remains crucial, particularly in high-risk populations such as obese patients. These patients have significantly higher rates of difficult mask ventilation and tracheal intubation.

Numerous bedside screening tests have been established to predict difficult laryngoscopy, including the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, the upper lip bite test (ULBT), and hyomental distance (HMD) measurements. However, none of these tests alone possesses sufficient sensitivity or specificity, and their predictive performance in obese individuals remains variable .

The Hyomental Distance Ratio (HMDR), defined as the ratio of the hyomental distance in maximal head extension to that in the neutral position , is a dynamic parameter reflecting upper airway compliance and anatomical displacement. An HMDR value <1.2 has been associated with increased risk of difficult laryngoscopy in several studies . Traditionally, the HMDR is measured either manually with a ruler or more objectively using ultrasound.

The Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) is a simple, validated bedside test assessing mandibular protrusion and temporomandibular joint mobility, two key factors influencing the success of glottic visualization . The ULBT is performed in a conscious state, making it a practical tool in airway assessment.

Given that the ULBT involves active mandibular protrusion, it may mimic the anterior displacement of airway structures achieved during head extension or jaw thrust. Therefore, measuring the hyomental distance while the patient performs the ULBT could serve as a novel dynamic modification of the traditional HMDR-potentially offering a more functional and patient-cooperative measure.

Recent studies have validated the HMDR (extension/neutral) as a useful predictor of difficult laryngoscopy by ultrasound, due to its capacity to evaluate the anterior neck space and upper airway alignment . However, these studies primarily assess neck extension without incorporating mandibular movement, despite its key role in airway visualization. To date, no published studies have evaluated the hyomental distance combined with the ULBT using ultrasound or compared it with the traditional HMDR, leaving an interesting gap in the literature.

Combining the anatomical advantages of anterior neck space assessment with functional jaw mobility via the HMDR combined with the ULBT may yield a more comprehensive and accurate predictor of difficult airway, especially in obese or anatomically challenging patients. This novel approach may detect subtle impairments in upper airway dynamics not captured by the static HMDR alone. To our knowledge, this application has not yet been explored in existing literature.

This study, therefore, aims to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, using difficult laryngoscopy-defined as Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4-as the primary outcome .

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

134

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

  • Nom: Yasmin Khaled Ahmed, MD
  • Numéro de téléphone: +201095015566
  • E-mail: dr_ykh@hotmail.com

Lieux d'étude

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypte
        • Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Yasmin Khalid Ahmed, MD
          • Numéro de téléphone: +201095015566
          • E-mail: dr_ykh@hotmail.com

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult obese patients aged 18 to 65 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II- III.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² (classified as obese).
  • Scheduled for elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
  • Ability to understand and provide informed written consent.
  • Cooperative and able to perform the ULBT on command.
  • Normal dentition (presence of upper and lower incisors to perform ULBT accurately).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of maxillofacial trauma, surgery, or congenital facial anomalies affecting mandibular movement or neck anatomy.
  • Known or suspected difficult airway requiring awake intubation.
  • Patients with limited neck mobility (e.g., cervical spine disease or immobilization).
  • Temporomandibular joint disorders or restricted mandibular mobility.
  • Pregnancy.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: HMD measured by US in neutral head position , maximum head extension and during upper lip bite test
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Prediction of difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade 3 or 4 on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation.
Délai: Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.

Difficult laryngoscopic view is defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation

Cormack-Lehane classification for laryngoscopic view :

grade 1: most of the vocal cords is seen; grade 2: only the posterior part of the vocal cords or the arytenoid cartilages are seen; grade 3: only epiglottis is seen; grade 4: epiglottis is not seen.

Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Determination of an optimal cutoff value for HMDR-ULBT to predict difficult laryngoscopy.
Délai: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value corresponding to the optimal cutoff value will be calculated.
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Délai: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.
The predictive performance of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) will be compared with that of the standard hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation. Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, will be compared between the two methods.
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juillet 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 février 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 mars 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

7 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

7 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

11 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

12 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • Airway Ultrasound

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner