Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Combined Ultrasound and Upper Lip Bite Test Assessment of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients

10. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Makarious Morris Aboelkheir Shenouda, Cairo University

Ultrasound-Measured Hyomental Distance Ratio Combined With the Upper Lip Bite Test as a Predictor of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, regarding:

  • Correlation of HMDR-ULBT values with Cormack-Lehane grades during laryngoscopy.
  • Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Airway management is a cornerstone of safe anesthesia practice. Difficult laryngoscopy and intubation remain a critical challenge for anesthesiologists. The ability to predict difficult airway situations preoperatively remains crucial, particularly in high-risk populations such as obese patients. These patients have significantly higher rates of difficult mask ventilation and tracheal intubation.

Numerous bedside screening tests have been established to predict difficult laryngoscopy, including the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, the upper lip bite test (ULBT), and hyomental distance (HMD) measurements. However, none of these tests alone possesses sufficient sensitivity or specificity, and their predictive performance in obese individuals remains variable .

The Hyomental Distance Ratio (HMDR), defined as the ratio of the hyomental distance in maximal head extension to that in the neutral position , is a dynamic parameter reflecting upper airway compliance and anatomical displacement. An HMDR value <1.2 has been associated with increased risk of difficult laryngoscopy in several studies . Traditionally, the HMDR is measured either manually with a ruler or more objectively using ultrasound.

The Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) is a simple, validated bedside test assessing mandibular protrusion and temporomandibular joint mobility, two key factors influencing the success of glottic visualization . The ULBT is performed in a conscious state, making it a practical tool in airway assessment.

Given that the ULBT involves active mandibular protrusion, it may mimic the anterior displacement of airway structures achieved during head extension or jaw thrust. Therefore, measuring the hyomental distance while the patient performs the ULBT could serve as a novel dynamic modification of the traditional HMDR-potentially offering a more functional and patient-cooperative measure.

Recent studies have validated the HMDR (extension/neutral) as a useful predictor of difficult laryngoscopy by ultrasound, due to its capacity to evaluate the anterior neck space and upper airway alignment . However, these studies primarily assess neck extension without incorporating mandibular movement, despite its key role in airway visualization. To date, no published studies have evaluated the hyomental distance combined with the ULBT using ultrasound or compared it with the traditional HMDR, leaving an interesting gap in the literature.

Combining the anatomical advantages of anterior neck space assessment with functional jaw mobility via the HMDR combined with the ULBT may yield a more comprehensive and accurate predictor of difficult airway, especially in obese or anatomically challenging patients. This novel approach may detect subtle impairments in upper airway dynamics not captured by the static HMDR alone. To our knowledge, this application has not yet been explored in existing literature.

This study, therefore, aims to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, using difficult laryngoscopy-defined as Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4-as the primary outcome .

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

134

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Ägypten
        • Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult obese patients aged 18 to 65 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II- III.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² (classified as obese).
  • Scheduled for elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
  • Ability to understand and provide informed written consent.
  • Cooperative and able to perform the ULBT on command.
  • Normal dentition (presence of upper and lower incisors to perform ULBT accurately).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of maxillofacial trauma, surgery, or congenital facial anomalies affecting mandibular movement or neck anatomy.
  • Known or suspected difficult airway requiring awake intubation.
  • Patients with limited neck mobility (e.g., cervical spine disease or immobilization).
  • Temporomandibular joint disorders or restricted mandibular mobility.
  • Pregnancy.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Sonstiges: HMD measured by US in neutral head position , maximum head extension and during upper lip bite test
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Prediction of difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade 3 or 4 on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation.
Zeitfenster: Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.

Difficult laryngoscopic view is defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation

Cormack-Lehane classification for laryngoscopic view :

grade 1: most of the vocal cords is seen; grade 2: only the posterior part of the vocal cords or the arytenoid cartilages are seen; grade 3: only epiglottis is seen; grade 4: epiglottis is not seen.

Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Determination of an optimal cutoff value for HMDR-ULBT to predict difficult laryngoscopy.
Zeitfenster: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value corresponding to the optimal cutoff value will be calculated.
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Zeitfenster: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.
The predictive performance of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) will be compared with that of the standard hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation. Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, will be compared between the two methods.
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Juli 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Februar 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. März 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

7. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

7. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

11. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

12. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

10. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • Airway Ultrasound

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Beurteilung der Atemwege

Abonnieren