Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Combined Ultrasound and Upper Lip Bite Test Assessment of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients

10 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: Makarious Morris Aboelkheir Shenouda, Cairo University

Ultrasound-Measured Hyomental Distance Ratio Combined With the Upper Lip Bite Test as a Predictor of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, regarding:

  • Correlation of HMDR-ULBT values with Cormack-Lehane grades during laryngoscopy.
  • Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Airway management is a cornerstone of safe anesthesia practice. Difficult laryngoscopy and intubation remain a critical challenge for anesthesiologists. The ability to predict difficult airway situations preoperatively remains crucial, particularly in high-risk populations such as obese patients. These patients have significantly higher rates of difficult mask ventilation and tracheal intubation.

Numerous bedside screening tests have been established to predict difficult laryngoscopy, including the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, the upper lip bite test (ULBT), and hyomental distance (HMD) measurements. However, none of these tests alone possesses sufficient sensitivity or specificity, and their predictive performance in obese individuals remains variable .

The Hyomental Distance Ratio (HMDR), defined as the ratio of the hyomental distance in maximal head extension to that in the neutral position , is a dynamic parameter reflecting upper airway compliance and anatomical displacement. An HMDR value <1.2 has been associated with increased risk of difficult laryngoscopy in several studies . Traditionally, the HMDR is measured either manually with a ruler or more objectively using ultrasound.

The Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) is a simple, validated bedside test assessing mandibular protrusion and temporomandibular joint mobility, two key factors influencing the success of glottic visualization . The ULBT is performed in a conscious state, making it a practical tool in airway assessment.

Given that the ULBT involves active mandibular protrusion, it may mimic the anterior displacement of airway structures achieved during head extension or jaw thrust. Therefore, measuring the hyomental distance while the patient performs the ULBT could serve as a novel dynamic modification of the traditional HMDR-potentially offering a more functional and patient-cooperative measure.

Recent studies have validated the HMDR (extension/neutral) as a useful predictor of difficult laryngoscopy by ultrasound, due to its capacity to evaluate the anterior neck space and upper airway alignment . However, these studies primarily assess neck extension without incorporating mandibular movement, despite its key role in airway visualization. To date, no published studies have evaluated the hyomental distance combined with the ULBT using ultrasound or compared it with the traditional HMDR, leaving an interesting gap in the literature.

Combining the anatomical advantages of anterior neck space assessment with functional jaw mobility via the HMDR combined with the ULBT may yield a more comprehensive and accurate predictor of difficult airway, especially in obese or anatomically challenging patients. This novel approach may detect subtle impairments in upper airway dynamics not captured by the static HMDR alone. To our knowledge, this application has not yet been explored in existing literature.

This study, therefore, aims to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, using difficult laryngoscopy-defined as Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4-as the primary outcome .

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

134

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

  • Nome: Yasmin Khaled Ahmed, MD
  • Numero di telefono: +201095015566
  • Email: dr_ykh@hotmail.com

Luoghi di studio

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egitto
        • Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University
        • Contatto:
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult obese patients aged 18 to 65 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II- III.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² (classified as obese).
  • Scheduled for elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
  • Ability to understand and provide informed written consent.
  • Cooperative and able to perform the ULBT on command.
  • Normal dentition (presence of upper and lower incisors to perform ULBT accurately).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of maxillofacial trauma, surgery, or congenital facial anomalies affecting mandibular movement or neck anatomy.
  • Known or suspected difficult airway requiring awake intubation.
  • Patients with limited neck mobility (e.g., cervical spine disease or immobilization).
  • Temporomandibular joint disorders or restricted mandibular mobility.
  • Pregnancy.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Altro: HMD measured by US in neutral head position , maximum head extension and during upper lip bite test
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Prediction of difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade 3 or 4 on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation.
Lasso di tempo: Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.

Difficult laryngoscopic view is defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation

Cormack-Lehane classification for laryngoscopic view :

grade 1: most of the vocal cords is seen; grade 2: only the posterior part of the vocal cords or the arytenoid cartilages are seen; grade 3: only epiglottis is seen; grade 4: epiglottis is not seen.

Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Determination of an optimal cutoff value for HMDR-ULBT to predict difficult laryngoscopy.
Lasso di tempo: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value corresponding to the optimal cutoff value will be calculated.
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Lasso di tempo: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.
The predictive performance of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) will be compared with that of the standard hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation. Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, will be compared between the two methods.
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 luglio 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 febbraio 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 marzo 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

7 giugno 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

7 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

11 giugno 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

12 giugno 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

10 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • Airway Ultrasound

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Valutazione delle vie aeree

Sottoscrivi