Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Combined Ultrasound and Upper Lip Bite Test Assessment of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients

10 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Makarious Morris Aboelkheir Shenouda, Cairo University

Ultrasound-Measured Hyomental Distance Ratio Combined With the Upper Lip Bite Test as a Predictor of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, regarding:

  • Correlation of HMDR-ULBT values with Cormack-Lehane grades during laryngoscopy.
  • Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Airway management is a cornerstone of safe anesthesia practice. Difficult laryngoscopy and intubation remain a critical challenge for anesthesiologists. The ability to predict difficult airway situations preoperatively remains crucial, particularly in high-risk populations such as obese patients. These patients have significantly higher rates of difficult mask ventilation and tracheal intubation.

Numerous bedside screening tests have been established to predict difficult laryngoscopy, including the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, the upper lip bite test (ULBT), and hyomental distance (HMD) measurements. However, none of these tests alone possesses sufficient sensitivity or specificity, and their predictive performance in obese individuals remains variable .

The Hyomental Distance Ratio (HMDR), defined as the ratio of the hyomental distance in maximal head extension to that in the neutral position , is a dynamic parameter reflecting upper airway compliance and anatomical displacement. An HMDR value <1.2 has been associated with increased risk of difficult laryngoscopy in several studies . Traditionally, the HMDR is measured either manually with a ruler or more objectively using ultrasound.

The Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) is a simple, validated bedside test assessing mandibular protrusion and temporomandibular joint mobility, two key factors influencing the success of glottic visualization . The ULBT is performed in a conscious state, making it a practical tool in airway assessment.

Given that the ULBT involves active mandibular protrusion, it may mimic the anterior displacement of airway structures achieved during head extension or jaw thrust. Therefore, measuring the hyomental distance while the patient performs the ULBT could serve as a novel dynamic modification of the traditional HMDR-potentially offering a more functional and patient-cooperative measure.

Recent studies have validated the HMDR (extension/neutral) as a useful predictor of difficult laryngoscopy by ultrasound, due to its capacity to evaluate the anterior neck space and upper airway alignment . However, these studies primarily assess neck extension without incorporating mandibular movement, despite its key role in airway visualization. To date, no published studies have evaluated the hyomental distance combined with the ULBT using ultrasound or compared it with the traditional HMDR, leaving an interesting gap in the literature.

Combining the anatomical advantages of anterior neck space assessment with functional jaw mobility via the HMDR combined with the ULBT may yield a more comprehensive and accurate predictor of difficult airway, especially in obese or anatomically challenging patients. This novel approach may detect subtle impairments in upper airway dynamics not captured by the static HMDR alone. To our knowledge, this application has not yet been explored in existing literature.

This study, therefore, aims to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, using difficult laryngoscopy-defined as Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4-as the primary outcome .

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

134

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

  • Nome: Yasmin Khaled Ahmed, MD
  • Número de telefone: +201095015566
  • E-mail: dr_ykh@hotmail.com

Locais de estudo

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egito
        • Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University
        • Contato:
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult obese patients aged 18 to 65 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II- III.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² (classified as obese).
  • Scheduled for elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
  • Ability to understand and provide informed written consent.
  • Cooperative and able to perform the ULBT on command.
  • Normal dentition (presence of upper and lower incisors to perform ULBT accurately).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of maxillofacial trauma, surgery, or congenital facial anomalies affecting mandibular movement or neck anatomy.
  • Known or suspected difficult airway requiring awake intubation.
  • Patients with limited neck mobility (e.g., cervical spine disease or immobilization).
  • Temporomandibular joint disorders or restricted mandibular mobility.
  • Pregnancy.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Outro
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Outro: HMD measured by US in neutral head position , maximum head extension and during upper lip bite test
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Prediction of difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade 3 or 4 on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation.
Prazo: Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.

Difficult laryngoscopic view is defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation

Cormack-Lehane classification for laryngoscopic view :

grade 1: most of the vocal cords is seen; grade 2: only the posterior part of the vocal cords or the arytenoid cartilages are seen; grade 3: only epiglottis is seen; grade 4: epiglottis is not seen.

Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Determination of an optimal cutoff value for HMDR-ULBT to predict difficult laryngoscopy.
Prazo: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value corresponding to the optimal cutoff value will be calculated.
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Prazo: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.
The predictive performance of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) will be compared with that of the standard hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation. Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, will be compared between the two methods.
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de julho de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de fevereiro de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de março de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

7 de junho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

7 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

11 de junho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

12 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

10 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • Airway Ultrasound

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever