- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07642206
Combined Ultrasound and Upper Lip Bite Test Assessment of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients
Ultrasound-Measured Hyomental Distance Ratio Combined With the Upper Lip Bite Test as a Predictor of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients: A Prospective Observational Study
The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, regarding:
- Correlation of HMDR-ULBT values with Cormack-Lehane grades during laryngoscopy.
- Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Descrição detalhada
Airway management is a cornerstone of safe anesthesia practice. Difficult laryngoscopy and intubation remain a critical challenge for anesthesiologists. The ability to predict difficult airway situations preoperatively remains crucial, particularly in high-risk populations such as obese patients. These patients have significantly higher rates of difficult mask ventilation and tracheal intubation.
Numerous bedside screening tests have been established to predict difficult laryngoscopy, including the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, the upper lip bite test (ULBT), and hyomental distance (HMD) measurements. However, none of these tests alone possesses sufficient sensitivity or specificity, and their predictive performance in obese individuals remains variable .
The Hyomental Distance Ratio (HMDR), defined as the ratio of the hyomental distance in maximal head extension to that in the neutral position , is a dynamic parameter reflecting upper airway compliance and anatomical displacement. An HMDR value <1.2 has been associated with increased risk of difficult laryngoscopy in several studies . Traditionally, the HMDR is measured either manually with a ruler or more objectively using ultrasound.
The Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) is a simple, validated bedside test assessing mandibular protrusion and temporomandibular joint mobility, two key factors influencing the success of glottic visualization . The ULBT is performed in a conscious state, making it a practical tool in airway assessment.
Given that the ULBT involves active mandibular protrusion, it may mimic the anterior displacement of airway structures achieved during head extension or jaw thrust. Therefore, measuring the hyomental distance while the patient performs the ULBT could serve as a novel dynamic modification of the traditional HMDR-potentially offering a more functional and patient-cooperative measure.
Recent studies have validated the HMDR (extension/neutral) as a useful predictor of difficult laryngoscopy by ultrasound, due to its capacity to evaluate the anterior neck space and upper airway alignment . However, these studies primarily assess neck extension without incorporating mandibular movement, despite its key role in airway visualization. To date, no published studies have evaluated the hyomental distance combined with the ULBT using ultrasound or compared it with the traditional HMDR, leaving an interesting gap in the literature.
Combining the anatomical advantages of anterior neck space assessment with functional jaw mobility via the HMDR combined with the ULBT may yield a more comprehensive and accurate predictor of difficult airway, especially in obese or anatomically challenging patients. This novel approach may detect subtle impairments in upper airway dynamics not captured by the static HMDR alone. To our knowledge, this application has not yet been explored in existing literature.
This study, therefore, aims to evaluate the accuracy of the HMDR combined with the ULBT as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, using difficult laryngoscopy-defined as Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4-as the primary outcome .
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Makarious Morris Aboelkheir, MSc
- Número de telefone: +201225246321
- E-mail: makariousmorris0@gmail.com
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Yasmin Khaled Ahmed, MD
- Número de telefone: +201095015566
- E-mail: dr_ykh@hotmail.com
Locais de estudo
-
-
Cairo Governorate
-
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egito
- Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University
-
Contato:
- Makarious Morris Aboelkheir, MSc
- Número de telefone: +201225246321
- E-mail: makariousmorris0@gmail.com
-
Contato:
- Yasmin Khalid Ahmed, MD
- Número de telefone: +201095015566
- E-mail: dr_ykh@hotmail.com
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult obese patients aged 18 to 65 years.
- Both sexes.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II- III.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² (classified as obese).
- Scheduled for elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
- Ability to understand and provide informed written consent.
- Cooperative and able to perform the ULBT on command.
- Normal dentition (presence of upper and lower incisors to perform ULBT accurately).
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of maxillofacial trauma, surgery, or congenital facial anomalies affecting mandibular movement or neck anatomy.
- Known or suspected difficult airway requiring awake intubation.
- Patients with limited neck mobility (e.g., cervical spine disease or immobilization).
- Temporomandibular joint disorders or restricted mandibular mobility.
- Pregnancy.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Outro
- Alocação: N / D
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Outro: HMD measured by US in neutral head position , maximum head extension and during upper lip bite test
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).
|
Hyomental distance will be measured using ultrasound in three positions: neutral head position, maximum head extension, and during the upper lip bite test (ULBT).
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Prediction of difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade 3 or 4 on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation.
Prazo: Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.
|
Difficult laryngoscopic view is defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation Cormack-Lehane classification for laryngoscopic view : grade 1: most of the vocal cords is seen; grade 2: only the posterior part of the vocal cords or the arytenoid cartilages are seen; grade 3: only epiglottis is seen; grade 4: epiglottis is not seen. |
Day of surgery from preoperative assessment to first laryngoscopy attempt after induction of general anethesia and after three minutes of mask ventilation.
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Determination of an optimal cutoff value for HMDR-ULBT to predict difficult laryngoscopy.
Prazo: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
|
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV on the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation.
The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value corresponding to the optimal cutoff value will be calculated.
|
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia on the day of surgery
|
|
Comparison of HMDR-ULBT with standard HMDR in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Prazo: From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.
|
The predictive performance of the hyomental distance ratio measured during the upper lip bite test (HMDR-ULBT) will be compared with that of the standard hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) for predicting difficult laryngoscopic view, defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade III or IV during the first laryngoscopy attempt without external laryngeal manipulation.
Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, will be compared between the two methods.
|
From preoperative airway assessment until completion of the first laryngoscopy attempt during induction of anesthesia.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Bhanushali A, Date A. Evaluation of upper lip bite test and thyromental height test for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective observational study. Airway. 2021;4(3):621-42.
- Hrithma D, K R, Mahadevaiah DT, K N V. A Cross-Sectional Study on Hyomental Distance Ratio (HMDR) as a New Predictor of Difficult Laryngoscopy in ICU Patients. Cureus. 2022 May 28;14(5):e25435. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25435. eCollection 2022 May.
- Liaskou C, Vouzounerakis E, Trikoupi A, Staikou C. [Evaluation of bedside tests and proposal of a model for predicting difficult laryngoscopy: an observational prospective study]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar-Apr;70(2):125-133. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 May 13.
- Liu Y, He Y, Wang X, Li J, Zhang Z, Zhuang X, et al. Advances in airway management in recent 10 years from 2013 to 2023. Anesthesiol Perioper Sci. 2023;1(4):27-30.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- Airway Ultrasound
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .