Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

EFFECTS OF TWO PAİN MANAGEMENT EDUCATİON METHODS DURİNG HEEL PRİCK PROCEDURES ON MATERNAL ANXİETY AND NEONATAL PAİN

16 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Sinem Öztürkler, Kocaeli University

THE EFFECT OF TWO DİFFERENT PAİN MANAGEMENT EDUCATİON METHODS PROVİDED FOR HEEL PRİCK PROCEDURES ON MOTHERS' USE OF NONPHARMACOLOGİCAL METHODS, ANXİETY LEVELS, AND NEONATAL PAİN

The aim of this research is to evaluate the effects of two different methods of education (verbal instruction + written brochure and verbal instruction + AI-assisted video presentation) given to new mothers on neonatal pain management, their use of non-pharmacological methods, anxiety levels, and neonatal pain, and to examine the relationship between them.

Research Questions Do two different pain management education methods affect mothers' use of nonpharmacological methods? Do two different pain management education methods affect mothers' anxiety levels? Do two different pain management education methods affect neonatal pain during heel prick procedures? Is there a difference between verbal instruction combined with a written brochure and verbal instruction combined with video demonstration in terms of mothers' use of nonpharmacological methods? Is there a difference between verbal instruction combined with a written brochure and verbal instruction combined with video demonstration in terms of maternal anxiety levels? Is there a difference between verbal instruction combined with a written brochure and verbal instruction combined with video demonstration in terms of neonatal pain during heel prick procedures? Is there a relationship between mothers' use of nonpharmacological methods and their anxiety levels? Is there a relationship between mothers' use of nonpharmacological methods and neonatal pain levels?

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

The International Association for the Study of Pain has defined pain as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential injury" (IASP, 1979). However, it has been noted that this definition is insufficient in newborns, who lack verbal communication, as they cannot express pain and have no opportunity to refuse treatment (Anand & Craig 1996), and later, pain was redefined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with or similar to actual or potential tissue damage (Raja et al. 2020). Newborns are frequently exposed to painful procedures during diagnostic and therapeutic processes such as routine newborn screenings, blood glucose measurement, and immunization (WHO, 2017). It has been reported that painful interventions experienced in early childhood can lead to short-term physiological changes as well as neurodevelopmental consequences (AAP 2016; Hatfield & Ely, 2015). Furthermore, it has been shown that exposure to painful stimuli in early life may be associated with stress responses and behavioral changes later in life (Taddio et al. 1997). The first step in pain management is the accurate assessment of pain. Therefore, it is important to use validated scales in the assessment of pain in newborns and to apply appropriate pain management methods (Costa et al. 2017; Rocha et al. 2021). Although pharmacological methods are frequently used in pain management in infants, interest in non-pharmacological methods has increased in recent years due to the physiological immaturity of newborns and possible side effects of drugs (Allegaert and van den Anker, 2017). Methods such as holding, non-nutritive sucking, breastfeeding, sucrose/glucose solutions, skin-to-skin contact, and swaddling are reported to be effective in reducing pain scores during short-term painful procedures (Mangat et al. 2018). The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that families be actively involved in the prevention and management of pain in newborns (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2016). Within the framework of the family-centered care approach, parental participation in the care of their babies is encouraged, and it is reported that the education given to parents increases the use of pain management methods (Taddio et al. 2013; Campbell-Yeo et al. 2017; Chambers et al. 2020). However, studies that evaluate the effects of different education methods given to mothers during heel prick blood sampling, one of the frequently performed painful procedures in newborns, on mothers' anxiety levels, non-pharmacological method use, and newborn pain are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to determine mothers' approaches to pain management during heel prick blood sampling performed within the scope of newborn screening and to evaluate the effects of two different education methods given before the procedure on mothers' use of non-pharmacological methods, anxiety levels, and newborn pain.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

75

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • İ̇zmi̇t
      • Kocaeli, İ̇zmi̇t, Turquie (Türkiye)
        • Kocaeli University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

Being 19 years of age or older Being a primiparous mother Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study Not having a psychiatric diagnosis Having a healthy term newborn baby (born at 38-42 gestational weeks) Having a blood sample taken for the Guthrie screening test

Exclusion Criteria:

Lack of Turkish reading and comprehension skills in the participant Incomplete completion of the survey form Having a baby with a congenital anomaly Having received any analgesia before the procedure Refusal to have a blood sample taken for the Guthrie screening test History of the baby staying in intensive care

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Aucune intervention: Control Group
The mothers underwent the clinic's routine procedure.
Expérimental: verbal and brochure-based education
Mothers were given training on non-pharmacological pain management through verbal and brochure education.
Non-pharmacological pain management methods for newborns were explained to mothers verbally and through brochures during heel prick blood tests.
Expérimental: verbal and AI-assisted video training
Mothers were given training in non-pharmacological pain management through verbal instruction and AI-assisted video training.
Non-pharmacological pain management methods for newborns were explained to mothers through verbal and AI-supported video training during heel prick blood sampling.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
mothers' anxiety
Délai: between 24 and 72 hours after birth
Those scoring between 20 and 80 points indicate anxiety.
between 24 and 72 hours after birth

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Newborn Pain Scale (NIPS)
Délai: between 24 and 72 hours after birth
The scale consists of six parameters: facial expression, crying, breathing, arm movements, leg movements, and sleep-wake status.
between 24 and 72 hours after birth

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 février 2025

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 avril 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 mai 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

16 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

22 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

22 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 2024/256

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner