Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

EFFECTS OF TWO PAİN MANAGEMENT EDUCATİON METHODS DURİNG HEEL PRİCK PROCEDURES ON MATERNAL ANXİETY AND NEONATAL PAİN

16 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: Sinem Öztürkler, Kocaeli University

THE EFFECT OF TWO DİFFERENT PAİN MANAGEMENT EDUCATİON METHODS PROVİDED FOR HEEL PRİCK PROCEDURES ON MOTHERS' USE OF NONPHARMACOLOGİCAL METHODS, ANXİETY LEVELS, AND NEONATAL PAİN

The aim of this research is to evaluate the effects of two different methods of education (verbal instruction + written brochure and verbal instruction + AI-assisted video presentation) given to new mothers on neonatal pain management, their use of non-pharmacological methods, anxiety levels, and neonatal pain, and to examine the relationship between them.

Research Questions Do two different pain management education methods affect mothers' use of nonpharmacological methods? Do two different pain management education methods affect mothers' anxiety levels? Do two different pain management education methods affect neonatal pain during heel prick procedures? Is there a difference between verbal instruction combined with a written brochure and verbal instruction combined with video demonstration in terms of mothers' use of nonpharmacological methods? Is there a difference between verbal instruction combined with a written brochure and verbal instruction combined with video demonstration in terms of maternal anxiety levels? Is there a difference between verbal instruction combined with a written brochure and verbal instruction combined with video demonstration in terms of neonatal pain during heel prick procedures? Is there a relationship between mothers' use of nonpharmacological methods and their anxiety levels? Is there a relationship between mothers' use of nonpharmacological methods and neonatal pain levels?

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

The International Association for the Study of Pain has defined pain as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential injury" (IASP, 1979). However, it has been noted that this definition is insufficient in newborns, who lack verbal communication, as they cannot express pain and have no opportunity to refuse treatment (Anand & Craig 1996), and later, pain was redefined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with or similar to actual or potential tissue damage (Raja et al. 2020). Newborns are frequently exposed to painful procedures during diagnostic and therapeutic processes such as routine newborn screenings, blood glucose measurement, and immunization (WHO, 2017). It has been reported that painful interventions experienced in early childhood can lead to short-term physiological changes as well as neurodevelopmental consequences (AAP 2016; Hatfield & Ely, 2015). Furthermore, it has been shown that exposure to painful stimuli in early life may be associated with stress responses and behavioral changes later in life (Taddio et al. 1997). The first step in pain management is the accurate assessment of pain. Therefore, it is important to use validated scales in the assessment of pain in newborns and to apply appropriate pain management methods (Costa et al. 2017; Rocha et al. 2021). Although pharmacological methods are frequently used in pain management in infants, interest in non-pharmacological methods has increased in recent years due to the physiological immaturity of newborns and possible side effects of drugs (Allegaert and van den Anker, 2017). Methods such as holding, non-nutritive sucking, breastfeeding, sucrose/glucose solutions, skin-to-skin contact, and swaddling are reported to be effective in reducing pain scores during short-term painful procedures (Mangat et al. 2018). The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that families be actively involved in the prevention and management of pain in newborns (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2016). Within the framework of the family-centered care approach, parental participation in the care of their babies is encouraged, and it is reported that the education given to parents increases the use of pain management methods (Taddio et al. 2013; Campbell-Yeo et al. 2017; Chambers et al. 2020). However, studies that evaluate the effects of different education methods given to mothers during heel prick blood sampling, one of the frequently performed painful procedures in newborns, on mothers' anxiety levels, non-pharmacological method use, and newborn pain are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to determine mothers' approaches to pain management during heel prick blood sampling performed within the scope of newborn screening and to evaluate the effects of two different education methods given before the procedure on mothers' use of non-pharmacological methods, anxiety levels, and newborn pain.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

75

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • İ̇zmi̇t
      • Kocaeli, İ̇zmi̇t, Turchia (Türkiye)
        • Kocaeli University

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

Being 19 years of age or older Being a primiparous mother Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study Not having a psychiatric diagnosis Having a healthy term newborn baby (born at 38-42 gestational weeks) Having a blood sample taken for the Guthrie screening test

Exclusion Criteria:

Lack of Turkish reading and comprehension skills in the participant Incomplete completion of the survey form Having a baby with a congenital anomaly Having received any analgesia before the procedure Refusal to have a blood sample taken for the Guthrie screening test History of the baby staying in intensive care

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Nessun intervento: Control Group
The mothers underwent the clinic's routine procedure.
Sperimentale: verbal and brochure-based education
Mothers were given training on non-pharmacological pain management through verbal and brochure education.
Non-pharmacological pain management methods for newborns were explained to mothers verbally and through brochures during heel prick blood tests.
Sperimentale: verbal and AI-assisted video training
Mothers were given training in non-pharmacological pain management through verbal instruction and AI-assisted video training.
Non-pharmacological pain management methods for newborns were explained to mothers through verbal and AI-supported video training during heel prick blood sampling.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
mothers' anxiety
Lasso di tempo: between 24 and 72 hours after birth
Those scoring between 20 and 80 points indicate anxiety.
between 24 and 72 hours after birth

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Newborn Pain Scale (NIPS)
Lasso di tempo: between 24 and 72 hours after birth
The scale consists of six parameters: facial expression, crying, breathing, arm movements, leg movements, and sleep-wake status.
between 24 and 72 hours after birth

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 febbraio 2025

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 aprile 2026

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

16 giugno 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

16 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

22 giugno 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

22 giugno 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

16 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 2024/256

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su verbal and brochure-based education

Sottoscrivi