Quality of Vision After Implantation of EDOF Implants Versus Monofocal Implants in Patients Who Underwent Epiretinal Membrane and Cataract Surgery (MACAEDOF)
A Prospective, Randomized Study Evaluating the Quality of Vision After Implantation of EDOF Implants Versus Monofocal Implants in Patients Who Underwent Epiretinal Membrane and Cataract Surgery
Phacoexistence, the first surgical procedure performed in France, naturally raises the question of lens replacement. In recent years, the choice of intraocular lenses has expanded considerably. The term EDOF (Extended Depth of Focus) refers to intraocular lenses offering an extended depth of field to improve vision at different distances, while reducing the visual aberrations associated with traditional multifocal lenses.
However, they still generate some optical aberrations that could therefore limit the quality of vision for patients with retinal damage.
With the development and acceleration of cataractogenic processes observed after vitrectomy, the use of combined phaco-vitrectomy surgery has become increasingly common, particularly among patients over 60 years of age. This integrated approach allows for the simultaneous treatment of cataracts and vitreoretinal pathologies, thus reducing the need for subsequent cataract surgery, which frequently develops after vitrectomy. In addition to optimizing the patient care pathway, this technique offers clinical advantages, such as faster visual recovery and fewer complications associated with multiple surgeries. Phacovitrectomy is therefore emerging as a practical and effective solution for managing elderly patients requiring vitreoretinal surgery.
Therefore, in the specific context of macular surgery, often considered less suitable for the use of premium implants, EDOF (Extended Depth of Focus) implants raise some questions. The available data on their performance and tolerability in this specific context remain limited, making their use still poorly defined in these complex clinical situations, except in certain medical macular pathologies.4 This study aims to evaluate, within the context of macular surgery, the relevance and potential role of EDOF (Extended Depth of Focus) implants in order to improve the management of these patients.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Jessica Delorme
- Numéro de téléphone: 00336 23 91 95 73
- E-mail: jessica.delorme@almaviva-sante.com
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Aix-en-Provence, France, 13097
- Clinique du Val d'Ouest - Centre Pôle Vision
-
Contact:
- Sébastien Guigou
- Numéro de téléphone: 0033442992150
- E-mail: rdv@aixvision.fr
-
Marseille, France, 13008
- Centre Monticelli Paradis
-
Contact:
- Frédéric MATONTI, Dr
- Numéro de téléphone: 00336 23 86 69 46
- E-mail: frederic.matonti@free.fr
-
Écully, France, 69130
- Clinique du Val d'Ouest - Centre Pôle Vision
-
Contact:
- Pierre-Loïc Cornut
- Numéro de téléphone: 0033478356969
- E-mail: jessica.delorme@almaviva-sante.com
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female over 18 years of age
- Epiretinal membrane with surgical indication
- Indication for cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation
- Epiretinal membranes with near visual acuity ≥ P4
- Preserved ellipsoidal zone in the retrofoveal region, without fragmentation or interruption
- Central macular thickness less than or equal to 450 microns
- Signed informed consent
- Patients covered by social security or an equivalent scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
- Associated ocular pathologies (advanced glaucoma, exudative AMD).
- Central macular thickness > 450 microns
- Epiretinal membranes with near visual acuity < P4
- Previous macular surgery
- Contraindication to the implantation of either type of lens
- Cognitive impairment, or a disorder causing difficulty understanding instructions or answering questionnaires
- Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding women, as defined in Article L1121-5 of the French Public Health Code (CSP)
- Protected individuals: adults under guardianship, curatorship, or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision.
- Patients incapable of personally giving consent, as defined in Article L.1121-8 of the French Public Health Code (CSP), or adults protected by law
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Autre
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Implants EDOF
|
NEI-VFQ (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire) 25 before the surgery, 3 months after and 6 months after the surgery.
ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) scale before the surgery and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the surgery
1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Two different cataract surgeries : TECNIS monofocal versus PureSee EDOF (extended depth of focus)
|
|
Comparateur actif: Monofocal implants
|
NEI-VFQ (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire) 25 before the surgery, 3 months after and 6 months after the surgery.
ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) scale before the surgery and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the surgery
1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Two different cataract surgeries : TECNIS monofocal versus PureSee EDOF (extended depth of focus)
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Distance visual acuity (4 m)
Délai: 3 months
|
Distance visual acuity (4 m) using the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) scale at 3 months. This involves asking the patient, positioned 4 meters away, to read a chart made up of 5 letters per line, with the size gradually decreasing from top to bottom. The score is determined by counting the number of letters read correctly (each letter is worth 1 point). The maximum score is 100 to 110 letters depending on the version. |
3 months
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Qualité des soins de santé, accès et évaluation
- Techniques d'investigation
- Méthodes épidémiologiques
- Techniques et procédures de diagnostic
- Diagnostic
- Procédures chirurgicales, opératoires
- Collecte de données
- Mécanismes d'évaluation des soins de santé
- Qualité des soins de santé
- Santé publique
- Environnement et santé publique
- Procédures chirurgicales ophtalmologiques
- Tomographie
- Imagerie diagnostique
- Tomographie, optique
- Imagerie optique
- Procédures de chirurgie réfractive
- Enquêtes et questionnaires
- Tomographie, cohérence optique
- Extraction de la cataracte
- Implantation de Lentille Intraoculaire
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2025-A02106-43
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .