- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT02091869
A Randomized Trial Examining the Effectiveness of Mobile-Based Asthma Action Plans vs. Paper Asthma Action Plans (PEAK2)
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, Stati Uniti, 72202
- Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 12 and ≤ 17 years.
- Access to Apple or Android based smart phone
Mild to severe persistent asthma or poorly controlled asthma (see definitions below).
o A different assessment of eligibility will be performed depending on whether or not the parent reports use of a preventive asthma medication at baseline. This is consistent with 2007 National Asthma Education Prevention Program recommendations that make a strong distinction between classifying asthma severity (for children not using preventive medications) and assessing control (for children using preventive medications). If a child has used a preventive medication in the past, but reports no use of the medication in the prior 3 months, we will assess severity.)
Children not using a preventive medication at baseline: Assess for mild persistent to severe persistent asthma. Any 1 of the following, during the prior 4 weeks (as defined by parent interview in the waiting room) will determine severity:
- An average of >2 days per week with asthma symptoms
- >2 days per week with rescue medication use
- ≥2 nights per month awakened with nighttime symptoms
- Minor limitation of activity
- ≥2 episodes of asthma during the past year that have required systemic corticosteroids
Children using a preventive medication at baseline: Assess for poorly controlled asthma. Any 1 of the following, during the prior 4 weeks (as defined by parent interview in the waiting room) will determine control:
- An average of >2 days per week with asthma symptoms
- >2 days per week with rescue medication use
- ≥2 nights per month awakened with nighttime symptoms
- Some limitation of activity
- ≥2 episodes of asthma during the past year that have required systemic corticosteroids.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant underlying respiratory disease other than asthma (such as cystic fibrosis or chronic lung disease) that could potentially interfere with asthma-related outcome measures.
- Significant co-morbid conditions (such as moderate to severe developmental delay, i.e. special education classroom or diagnosis) that could preclude participation in an education-based intervention.
- Inability to speak or understand English (child or parent).
- Children in foster care or other situations in which consent cannot be obtained from a guardian.
- Prior enrollment in the study.
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Trattamento
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Paper Asthma Action Plan
Participants will utilize a paper-based asthma action plan to record asthma symptoms, peak flows, and medication usage.
|
Participants will utilize a paper based asthma action plan to record asthma symptoms and medication usage.
|
|
Sperimentale: Mobile Phone
Participants will record asthma symptoms, medication usage, and peak flow data on their phones.
|
Participant will be able to log peak flow data, medications, and symptoms in their mobile phones utilizing the mobile app.
Altri nomi:
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Asthma Control Test Scores
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Six months
|
The Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) is a 5 question health survey used to measure asthma control in individuals 12 years of age and older.
The total sum scores range from 5-25.
Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.
The ACT is an efficient, reliable, and valid method of measuring asthma control, with or without, lung functioning measures such as spirometry.
ACT helps identify and detect asthma patients who are not well controlled.
ACT scores were examined pre- and post-intervention.
A score total of 19 or less means asthma may not be well controlled.
The timeframe is during the past 4 weeks.
The scale range for Question 1 is "all the time" (1) to "none of the time" (5); Question 2 range: "more than once a day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 3 range: "4 or more nights a week" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 4 range: "3 or more times per day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 5 range: "not controlled at all" (1) to "completely controlled" (5).
|
Baseline and Six months
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Asthma Self-Efficacy Scores
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Six months
|
The Child Self-Efficacy instrument is a 14 item validated questionnaire designed to measure the child's self-efficacy with regard to attack prevention and attack management.
The child will be required to select one of 5 responses ranging from "not at all sure" (1 point); "a little bit sure" (2 points); "fairly sure" (3 points); "quite sure" (4 points) to "completely sure" (5 points).
Total score range from 14-70.
The attack prevention scale range from 6-30 and attack management range from 8-40.
The higher score represent a greater degree of self-efficacy.
The Cronbach's α reliability = 0.75.
The child self-efficacy questionnaire will be administered at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the intervention (post-intervention).
|
Baseline and Six months
|
Altre misure di risultato
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of Participant Usage Rates Between Mobile and Paper Asthma Action Plans
Lasso di tempo: Six months
|
We measured the participant usage rates by frequency of a mobile asthma action plan compared to usage rates of a paper asthma action plan.
No mobile usage data was collected for the paper asthma plan group; and no paper usage data was collected for mobile phone group.
|
Six months
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Tamara T Perry, MD,FAAP, University of Arkansas
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Garbe PL, Sondik EJ. Status of childhood asthma in the United States, 1980-2007. Pediatrics. 2009 Mar;123 Suppl 3:S131-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2233C.
- Braun-Fahrlander C, Gassner M, Grize L, Minder CE, Varonier HS, Vuille JC, Wuthrich B, Sennhauser FH. Comparison of responses to an asthma symptom questionnaire (ISAAC core questions) completed by adolescents and their parents. SCARPOL-Team. Swiss Study on Childhood Allergy and Respiratory Symptoms with respect to Air Pollution. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998 Mar;25(3):159-66. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199803)25:33.0.co;2-h.
- Venn A, Lewis S, Cooper M, Hill J, Britton J. Questionnaire study of effect of sex and age on the prevalence of wheeze and asthma in adolescence. BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1945-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1945. No abstract available.
- Forero R, Bauman A, Young L, Larkin P. Asthma prevalence and management in Australian adolescents: results from three community surveys. J Adolesc Health. 1992 Dec;13(8):707-12. doi: 10.1016/1054-139x(92)90068-m.
- Kyngas HA. Compliance of adolescents with asthma. Nurs Health Sci. 1999 Sep;1(3):195-202. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2018.1999.00025.x.
- Moorman JE, Rudd RA, Johnson CA, King M, Minor P, Bailey C, Scalia MR, Akinbami LJ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National surveillance for asthma--United States, 1980-2004. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Oct 19;56(8):1-54.
- Calmes D, Leake BD, Carlisle DM. Adverse asthma outcomes among children hospitalized with asthma in California. Pediatrics. 1998 May;101(5):845-50. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.5.845.
- Perry TT, Marshall A, Berlinski A, Rettiganti M, Brown RH, Randle SM, Luo C, Bian J. Smartphone-based vs paper-based asthma action plans for adolescents. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Mar;118(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.11.028. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Stima)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 202623
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Descrizione del piano IPD
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .