- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT05293990
Usefulness of Gadovist-enhanced FLAIR Imaging
14 marzo 2022 aggiornato da: Ryoo, In Seon
Usefulness of Gadovist-enhanced FLAIR Imaging in Differentiation Between a Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastasis: Single Center Prospective Study
Polyplastic glioblastoma and metastatic brain cancer are the most common malignant brain tumors in adults.
The primary diagnostic test for tumors in the brain shows magnetic resonance imaging or similar imaging findings (especially single metastatic brain cancer) that make it difficult to distinguish between these two diseases.
In addition, due to the specificity of the tissue called the brain, biopsy is not easy and sometimes biopsy is difficult, so non-invasive discrimination is often important, and it is important how much prediction is made before the biopsy.
To solve this problem, various advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques have been studied, but they are all tests that need to be additionally conducted on ordinary magnetic resonance images, and there are many subjective factors, so complex data and statistical processing methods, and many cannot be easily tested.
In addition, in all of these tests, accuracy is still reported at around 60%.
Therefore, if contrast-enhanced FLAIR images can be obtained along with contrast-enhanced T1 images performed during conventional magnetic resonance imaging tests to help differentiate between two diseases, it will greatly help diagnose and treat brain tumor patients and facilitate clinical application.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Completato
Condizioni
Descrizione dettagliata
Polyplastic glioblastoma and metastatic brain tumors are the most common brain tumors in adults.
Polyplastic glioblastoma is the most common tumor among malignant primary brain tumors, and metastatic brain tumors are the most common brain tumors in adults.
In the diagnosis of brain tumors, magnetic resonance imaging is the most basic and primary imaging technique to date.
However, in the case of a single metastatic brain tumor, the tumor shape, signal intensity, contrast enhancement pattern, and peripheral signal intensity appear so similar that they are hardly distinguished from polymorphic glioblastoma in conventional magnetic resonance images.
However, it is very important to distinguish between the two diseases because the above two diseases have completely different characteristics in clinical aspects, surgical method decisions, treatment decisions, and prognosis.
Obtaining histological results will be the ultimate answer, but due to the nature of tissue called the brain, non-invasive tests are preferred, and sometimes patients (e.g., cardiovascular disease) or lesions themselves cannot handle surgery are in a very important part of the brain, so it depends on imaging techniques.
In addition, the distinction between the two diseases through imaging is important in that it is important to predict in advance even if biopsy is performed through surgery.
Therefore, various advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques such as diffusion-enhanced imaging (DWI), perfusion imaging (perfusion), and spectroscopic imaging (MR spectroscopy) have been attempted to better differentiate the two diseases through imaging tests.
However, these images are additional imaging tests that need to be obtained after obtaining conventional magnetic resonance images and are usually accompanied by complex and various statistical analyses due to many subjective elements.
In addition, there are tests that are difficult to conduct other than large hospitals with a certain size or larger.
Nevertheless, the accuracy of the discrimination between the two diseases to date is around 60%.
In addition, such tests are often difficult to perform in most hospitals, except for large hospitals with a certain size or larger.
Therefore, if the two diseases can be better identified in conventional magnetic resonance imaging, it will be of great help to patient care clinically and it is expected that actual clinical application will be easier.
Contrast-enhanced T1 highlighted images are always performed in conventional magnetic resonance images, and after that, one more FLAIR image is obtained to see if contrast-enhanced FLAIR images are helpful in differentiating the two diseases.
Tipo di studio
Interventistico
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
60
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Gurogu
-
Seoul, Gurogu, Corea, Repubblica di, 08308
- Korea University Guro Hospital
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
19 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)
Accetta volontari sani
No
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Tutto
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients who undergo treatment, including surgery, after examining contrast-enhanced MR with an intra-brain mass that must exclude malignant tumors.
- Adults over 19 years of age at the time of examination
- Patients who agreed to this clinical study
Exclusion Criteria:
- In the case of severe cognitive of dysfunction or neurological defects (mRS>3)
- Pregnant or lactating patient
- Patients who are allergic to MRI contrast agents or cannot perform MRI for other reasons.
- Patients participating in other drug clinical trials as of the screening day (observation studies are possible)
Piano di studio
Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Diagnostico
- Assegnazione: N / A
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
- Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Altro: Contrast-enhanced fluid attenuated inversion recovery
Confirmation of the difference between FLAIR contrast enhancement and T1 contrast enhancement patterns-->PACS monitor shows the maximum dimension of FLAIR and T1 contrast enhancement by two neurology radiologists on FLAIR and T1 contrast enhancement images.
In addition, the maximum diameter of the T2 high-signal lesion around the tumor is obtained using FLAIR images before contrast in the same plane.
(Dt2)
|
Usefulness of Gadovist-enhanced FLAIR imaging in differentiation between a glioblastoma and solitary brain metastasis
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by axial FLAIR and axial spin-echo T1-weighted image
Lasso di tempo: about 5 year
|
Two 3.0 Tesla MR machines (MAGNETOM Trio A Tim and MAGNETOM Prisma; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) were used in this study.
The protocol consisted of axial FLAIR (TR/TE/TI=9,000/100/2,500 milliseconds, with slice thickness of 2 mm) and axial spin-echo T1-weighted image (TR/TE=675/8.9
milliseconds, with slice thickness of 2 mm).
After both pre-enhancement images are acquired, CE-T1WI and CE-FLAIR sequences were obtained 5 and 10 minutes after administering gadolinium-based contrast agents, respectively.
Gadobutrol (Gadovist™, 0.1 millimol per kilogram of body weight, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) was used as the contrast agent, via automated injector (Spectris MR; Medrad Europe, Maastricht, Netherlands).
Subtraction images for both CE-FLAIR and CE-T1WI sequences were also obtained.
Detailed protocol image sequence parameter is provided in shown in Online Resource 2.
|
about 5 year
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.
Sponsor
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Ryoo In Seon, dotorate, Korea University Guro Hospital
Studiare le date dei record
Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
2 febbraio 2017
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
25 gennaio 2021
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
25 gennaio 2021
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
8 febbraio 2022
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
14 marzo 2022
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
24 marzo 2022
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
24 marzo 2022
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
14 marzo 2022
Ultimo verificato
1 marzo 2022
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 2017GR0776
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .