Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

CanRisk-Based Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment Versus Standard Practice (DISARM CSA) (DISARM CSA)

2 settembre 2026 aggiornato da: Fatima Vaz, Instituto Portugues Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil

Operationalising Multifactorial Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment Using the CanRisk Tool Versus Standard Practices.

The purpose of this study is to improve how the risk of developing ovarian cancer is assessed in people who may be at increased risk of ovarian cancer due to their family history or genetic background.

In current clinical practice, ovarian cancer risk assessment usually relies on information about cancer in the family and, in some cases, genetic testing for certain genes known to be associated with ovarian cancer. While this approach is commonly used, the inclusion of additional factors may support more personalised ovarian cancer risk assessment.

This study compares two approaches to ovarian cancer risk assessment:

  • Standard clinical practice, which follows current national guidelines, and
  • A more personalised risk assessment, which uses a validated tool called CanRisk, recommended by European guidelines, to combine family history, genetic test results, and other factors, including health and lifestyle-related factors.

By comparing these two approaches, the study aims to understand whether the personalised risk assessment tool, CanRisk, can be used in everyday clinical care. To do this, researchers will investigate whether the CanRisk tool is feasible in clinical practice, acceptable to both healthcare professionals and persons receiving a risk assessment, as well as whether it can be delivered in a cost-effective way.

The study does not involve people who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer. It focuses on individuals who are currently cancer-free and are undergoing assessment because they may have an increased risk of ovarian cancer.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the leading causes of gynaecological cancer mortality in Europe, largely due to late diagnosis and the absence of effective population-level screening. Identifying women at increased risk is therefore essential to enable targeted prevention and early detection strategies. The CanRisk tool is a CE-marked multifactorial risk prediction tool that integrates family history, genetic and non-genetic factors to provide personalised risk estimates. While the tool has been validated extensively and is endorsed by international and European guidelines, the collection of data on its real-world feasibility, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness could enhance adoption in routine clinical practice. The CSA study contributes to this goal by comparing CanRisk-based risk assessment with standard practice across clinical sites in four European countries, generating key evidence for future implementation of precision prevention approaches in OC. The DISARM Clinical Study A (CSA) is a multisite, multi-country, non-commercial, low interventional randomised controlled study designed to evaluate the implementation of multifactorial ovarian cancer risk assessment using the CanRisk tool compared with standard practice. The study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of CanRisk-based ovarian cancer risk assessment across clinical sites in Greece, Portugal, the Czech Republic and Lithuania.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

2130

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Grecia
      • Athens, Grecia
        • Reclutamento
        • Dept of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

Sì

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women, trans men, non-binary people with female reproductive organs
  2. Aged 18 to 75 years
  3. Referred or self-referred because of a family history suggestive of increased risk for ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneum cancer, or because a family member has been found to have a PV associated with OC risk
  4. Able to give informed consent
  5. Expected to remain in the study catchment area for the duration of follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Personal history of cancer
  2. Previously undergone Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy (RRSO)
  3. Previously undergone multifactorial risk assessment (using CanRisk or another tool) incorporating risk factors, family history and genetic testing (panel +/- PGS)
  4. Any condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the participant's ability to participate or comply with study requirements

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: CanRisk Intervention
Participants receive ovarian cancer risk assessment using the CanRisk tool incorporating personal and family history, genetic testing results, and a polygenic risk score (PRS), in addition to standard clinical management.
Altro: CanRisk
Risk assessment using the CanRisk tool, incorporating personal and family history, genetic testing results and polygenic risk score (PRS), to provide individualized ovarian cancer risk estimation.
Comparatore attivo: Standard Care
Participants receive standard clinical genetic assessment and management according to national clinical practice without CanRisk-guided risk estimation
Altro: Standard clinical risk assessment
Standard clinical genetic counselling, genetic testing and risk assessment according to national clinical practice, without use of the CanRisk tool.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Recruitment Rate
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Proportion of eligible individuals who consent to enroll in the study.
Month 12
Retention Rate
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Proportion of enrolled participants who complete the study through final assessment.
Month 12
CanRisk Data Completeness
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Proportion of CanRisk assessments completed with full data entry.
Month 12
Time to Complete CanRisk Assessment vs. Standard Practice
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Average time required to complete a CanRisk-based risk assessment compared with standard practice risk assessment.
Month 12
Consultation and Assessment Workflow Timelines
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Time required for consultation and assessment workflow processes associated with the CanRisk-based assessment.
Month 12
Usability of CanRisk (System Usability Scale)
Lasso di tempo: Month 6 & 12
Usability of the CanRisk tool as rated by healthcare professionals using the System Usability Scale (SUS), assessed at mid-study and end of study.
Month 6 & 12
Qualitative Implementation Assessment (CFIR)
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Number and type of implementation barriers and facilitators identified through qualitative assessment guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), at end of study.
Month 12
Acceptability by Healthcare Professionals (TFA Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: Month 6 &12
Acceptability of CanRisk-based assessment among healthcare professionals, measured using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) Generic Questionnaire, assessed at mid-study and end of study.
Month 6 &12
HCP Satisfaction with CanRisk vs. Standard Practice
Lasso di tempo: Month 6 & 12
Proportion of healthcare professionals reporting satisfaction with CanRisk versus standard practice assessment, assessed at mid-study and end of study.
Month 6 & 12
HCP Willingness to Continue Using CanRisk
Lasso di tempo: Month 6 & 12
Proportion of healthcare professionals indicating willingness to continue using CanRisk after study completion, assessed at mid-study and end of study.
Month 6 & 12
Qualitative Feedback from Healthcare Professionals
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Number and type of themes identified from focus groups and/or semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals, at end of study.
Month 12
Acceptability by Study Participants (TFA Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: Immediately following delivery of risk assessment results
Acceptability of risk assessment results among study participants, measured using the TFA Generic Questionnaire, administered immediately after delivery of results.
Immediately following delivery of risk assessment results
Incremental Mean Cost per Participant
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Incremental mean cost per participant at 12 months, including assessment-related and downstream care costs incurred within follow-up.
Month 12
Incremental Cost per Completed Risk Assessment
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Incremental cost per completed CanRisk-based risk assessment.
Month 12
Incremental Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Incremental quality-adjusted life years accrued over 12 months, comparing CanRisk-based assessment to standard practice.
Month 12
Descriptive Subgroup Summaries of Costs and Outcomes
Lasso di tempo: Month 12
Descriptive summary of costs and outcomes across pre-specified subgroups.
Month 12

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Instituto Portugues Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil

Collaboratori

European Commission

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

6 agosto 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 settembre 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 settembre 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

22 luglio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

2 settembre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

9 settembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

9 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

2 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • DISARM CSA

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi