Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Effects of Optokinetic Stimulation Without a Reading Task in Patients With Hemianopic Alexia (OPTO)

15 settembre 2026 aggiornato da: Clinique Les Trois Soleils

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether optokinetic stimulation delivered without a reading task can improve reading performance in adults with post-stroke hemianopic alexia. The main question it aims to answer is: does optokinetic stimulation without a reading task improve reading speed more than optokinetic stimulation with a reading task? Optokinetic stimlation with a reading task is considered the standard rehabilitation. These two conditions will be administered according to a randomized crossover design to determine wether the presence or absence of a reading task influences reading outcomes.

Participants will

  • receive 4 weeks of optokinetic stimulation without a reading task and 4 weeks of optokinétic stimulation with a reading task, with the order of these two interventions determined by randomization,
  • undergo assesments of reading performance, oculomotor behavior, visual field and rehabilitation tolerability before and after each intervention period,
  • undergo a follow-up assesment 1 month after completion of the interventions.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Stroke can cause a visual field defect known as homonymous hemianopia (HH). When this visual field loss involves the macula, the central area of vision, it may result in reading difficulties known as hemianopic alexia (HA).

The literature reports improved reading performance in these patients after repeated induction of horizontal optokinetic nystagmus (i.e., an oculomotor reflex consisting of horizontal saccades). To induce this nystagmus, previous studies have used a reading task involving text scrolling from right to left.

However, this type of exercise, which relies on reading, is cognitively demanding and may lead to frustration due to reading difficulties, fatigue, and reduced motivation and potentially the impact of rehabilitation. Therefore, the use of a non-reading task could help overcome these limitations.

The present study aims to compare the efficacy of optokinetic stimulation with reading to optokinetic stimulation without reading in patients with HA.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

30

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Île-de-France Region
      • Boissise-le-Roi, Île-de-France Region, Francia, 77310
        • Clinique Les Trois Soleils
        • Contatto:
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Christophe Duret

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Time since lesion > 1 month
  • Diagnosis of homonymous hemianopia post-stroke without macular sparing
  • Reading complaint and/or reading impairment
  • Proficiency in reading French
  • Agreed to give informed consent
  • Afiliated with national health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Visual impairment of peripheral origin (i.e., related to damage to the structures of the eye or the optic nerve)
  • Uncorrected visual acuity deficit
  • Reading disorder prior to the stroke (dyslexia)
  • Instability of reading impairment
  • Instability of homonymous hemianopia
  • Major cognitive that would limit the ability of the patient to participate in the study (unilateral spatial neglect, simultanagnosia, comprehension disorder, oral expression disorder)

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione incrociata
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Altro: Group A

Patients receive 15 sessions of optokinetic rehabilitation with a reading task, followed by 15 sessions of optokinetic rehabilitation without an associated reading task.

The optokinetic rehabilitation sessions with reading are considered the standard of care, while optokinetic rehabilitation without an associated reading task is the experimental condition. Each patient undergoes both conditions sequentially and serves as their own control.

Participants are exposed to a horizontally moving optokinetic visual stimulus on a computer screen for 40 minutes per session. The task consists of viewing random sequences of letters scrolling from right to left. The sessions are spread out over 4 weeks, with 3 or 4 sessions per week, to achieve 10 hours (15 sessions) of optokinetic rehabilitation.

Participants are exposed to a horizontally moving optokinetic visual stimulus on a computer screen for 40 minutes per session. The task consists of reading aloud sentences scrolling from right to left. The sessions are spread out over 4 weeks, with 3 or 4 sessions per week, to achieve 10 hours (15 sessions) of optokinetic rehabilitation. The scrolling speed ranges from 85 to 275 words per minute, depending on the participant's reading accuracy.

Altro: Group B

Patients receive 15 sessions of optokinetic rehabilitation without an associated reading task, followed by 15 sessions of optokinetic rehabilitation with a reading task.

The optokinetic rehabilitation sessions with reading are considered the standard of care, while optokinetic rehabilitation without an associated reading task is the experimental condition. Each patient undergoes both conditions sequentially and serves as their own control.

Participants are exposed to a horizontally moving optokinetic visual stimulus on a computer screen for 40 minutes per session. The task consists of viewing random sequences of letters scrolling from right to left. The sessions are spread out over 4 weeks, with 3 or 4 sessions per week, to achieve 10 hours (15 sessions) of optokinetic rehabilitation.

Participants are exposed to a horizontally moving optokinetic visual stimulus on a computer screen for 40 minutes per session. The task consists of reading aloud sentences scrolling from right to left. The sessions are spread out over 4 weeks, with 3 or 4 sessions per week, to achieve 10 hours (15 sessions) of optokinetic rehabilitation. The scrolling speed ranges from 85 to 275 words per minute, depending on the participant's reading accuracy.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in reading speed on paper
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Change in the number of correctly read words per minute, assessed using the International Reading Speed Texts (IReST). For each participant, the change in reading speed will be calculated separately for the optokinetic rehabilitation condition with a reading task and for the optokinetic rehabilitation condition without a reading task. The within-participant changes obtained after each 4-week period will be pooled across the two randomized sequences and compared between conditions. A higher reading speed indicates better reading performance.

Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in reading accuracy on paper
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Change in the number and type of errors (paralexias, omissions) assessed using the International Reading Speed Texts (IReST).

Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in reading speed on screen
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Change in the number of correctly read words per minute, assessed using a screen-based reading task

Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in reading accuracy on screen
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Change in the number and type of errors (paralexias, omissions), assessed during a screen-based reading task

Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in subjective reading abilities
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Change in the score on the Hemianopia Reading Questionnaire (HRQ)

Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in ocular fixations during reading
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Change in the number of fixations and in the mean fixation duration (in ms) during the screen-based reading task, assessed with an eyetracker

Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in ocular saccades during reading
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Change in the number and in the mean amplitude of saccades (in degrees) during the screen-based reading task, assessed with an eyetracker

Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in optokinetic nystagmus
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and at the end of both rehabilitation: Week 0 and Week 8

Change of saccade amplitude and frequency during optokinetic stimulation

Baseline and at the end of both rehabilitation: Week 0 and Week 8
Change in visual detection during standard perimetry
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Change in visual sensitivity (in dB) at each tested visual field location on automated static perimetry (Humphrey or Octopus)

Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in visual detection during screen-based perimetry
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8

Change in number of correctly detected targets and mean reaction time (in ms) at each tested visual field location on screen-based perimetry

Baseline and end of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8
Tolerability of rehabilitation
Lasso di tempo: Before and after each rehabilitation session

Score of fatigue, stress, and mood induced by the treatment, self-assessed using a numbered visual analogue scale

Before and after each rehabilitation session
Motivation for rehabilitation
Lasso di tempo: End of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 4 and Week 8

Score obtained on the Situational Motivation Scale

End of each 4-week rehabilitation period: Week 4 and Week 8

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Christophe Duret, Clinique Les Trois Soleils, Boissise-le-Roi, France

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 ottobre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 giugno 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 giugno 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

15 settembre 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

15 settembre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

21 settembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

21 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

15 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi