Identification of Take Home Message in Lecture Based Learning (T-REX 2)
Identification of Take Home Message in Lecture Based Learning: a Randomize Controlled Trial
Medical education involves the acquisition of a large quantity of information. Lecture-based learning (LBL) is the best known of conventional teaching methods. Two thirds of critical care junior doctors identified at best only one of the three main take-home messages of a lecture, suggesting that knowledge transfer is poor during passive format learning.
The investigators assess the impact of an intervention including the identification of take-home message of lecture with slides calling "Learning Objectives", "Message", "Conclusion", in the identification of take-home message in critical care junior doctors.
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
Medical education involves the acquisition of a large quantity of information. Lecture-based learning (LBL) is the best known of conventional teaching methods. The main purpose of a lecture is knowledge transfer [1] and its great advantage is that of transferring knowledge from one individual to several or many. Knowledge transfer via LBL is still widely used in international medical congresses, in continuing medical education online via downloading of lectures offered by leading medical schools, and in postgraduate medical education in several countries. We showed that in prospective study of 13 lectures that two thirds of critical care junior doctors identified at best only one of the three main take-home messages of a lecture, suggesting that knowledge transfer is poor during passive format learning.
In this study, we assess the impact of an intervention including the identification of take-home message of lecture with slides calling "Learning Objectives", "Message", "Conclusion", in the identification of take-home message in critical care junior doctors.
6 lectures are performed by professor without specific orders. 6 lectures are performed by professor with the intervention. Both groups of professors do not know this study The critical care juniors do not know the intervention. We compare the take-home messages of students with those of lecturer, 1 month after the lecture.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand、フランス、63003
- CHU Clermont-Ferrand
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- critical care junior who attends lecture
Exclusion Criteria:
- refusal
- critical care junior who do not speak french
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
Take-Home message
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Number of match lecturer's take home message
時間枠:1 month after the lecture
|
1 month after the lecture
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Measure of correct responses to multiple choice-questions
時間枠:1 month after the lecture
|
1 month after the lecture
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Alexandre Lautrette、University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
出版物と役立つリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- CHU-0143
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。