Identification of Take Home Message in Lecture Based Learning (T-REX 2)
Identification of Take Home Message in Lecture Based Learning: a Randomize Controlled Trial
Medical education involves the acquisition of a large quantity of information. Lecture-based learning (LBL) is the best known of conventional teaching methods. Two thirds of critical care junior doctors identified at best only one of the three main take-home messages of a lecture, suggesting that knowledge transfer is poor during passive format learning.
The investigators assess the impact of an intervention including the identification of take-home message of lecture with slides calling "Learning Objectives", "Message", "Conclusion", in the identification of take-home message in critical care junior doctors.
研究概览
地位
详细说明
Medical education involves the acquisition of a large quantity of information. Lecture-based learning (LBL) is the best known of conventional teaching methods. The main purpose of a lecture is knowledge transfer [1] and its great advantage is that of transferring knowledge from one individual to several or many. Knowledge transfer via LBL is still widely used in international medical congresses, in continuing medical education online via downloading of lectures offered by leading medical schools, and in postgraduate medical education in several countries. We showed that in prospective study of 13 lectures that two thirds of critical care junior doctors identified at best only one of the three main take-home messages of a lecture, suggesting that knowledge transfer is poor during passive format learning.
In this study, we assess the impact of an intervention including the identification of take-home message of lecture with slides calling "Learning Objectives", "Message", "Conclusion", in the identification of take-home message in critical care junior doctors.
6 lectures are performed by professor without specific orders. 6 lectures are performed by professor with the intervention. Both groups of professors do not know this study The critical care juniors do not know the intervention. We compare the take-home messages of students with those of lecturer, 1 month after the lecture.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand、法国、63003
- CHU clermont-ferrand
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- critical care junior who attends lecture
Exclusion Criteria:
- refusal
- critical care junior who do not speak french
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
Take-Home message
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
Number of match lecturer's take home message
大体时间:1 month after the lecture
|
1 month after the lecture
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
Measure of correct responses to multiple choice-questions
大体时间:1 month after the lecture
|
1 month after the lecture
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Alexandre Lautrette、University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他研究编号
- CHU-0143
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.