Pre/Post Pilot Test of Video Module Education
Pre/Post Pilot Test of VME for the Video vs. TTG Respiratory Inhaler Technique Assessment and InstructioN Study
Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) results in over a million hospitalizations in the United States annually and COPD is the third leading cause of 30-day re-hospitalizations. Clinical trials have established the efficacy of treatments primarily dispensed via respiratory inhaler devices that reduce morbidity and health care utilization if they are used correctly. The effectiveness of these medications in real-world settings is limited by the fact that patients often do not use inhalers correctly. Current guidelines recommend assessing and teaching inhaler technique at all health care encounters, including hospitalization. Over 75% of hospitalized patients in an urban, predominantly underserved population misused their respiratory inhalers, highlighting a missed opportunity to educate these patients with high potential to benefit. Hospitalization, therefore, provides a potential 'teachable moment' to correct this misuse. My preliminary data indicate that one strategy, in-person teach-to-goal (TTG), is effective in teaching hospitalized patients proper inhaler technique and is more effective than simple verbal instruction. While TTG is a promising, several limitations prevent widespread adoption. TTG is time-consuming and costly. Also, reinforcement may be needed, which may be impractical with in-person TTG. One potential method to surmount TTG's limitations is use of interactive video module education (VME) that has the potential to be less costly, maintain fidelity, and be more easily extended into the post-discharge setting than in-person TTG. Before widespread implementation of VME, it is critical to rigorously develop and test VME for inhaler education in the hospital setting. Ultimately, it will also be important to understand patients' ability and willingness to use post-discharge VME for educational reinforcement to allow for this strategy to transition patients across care settings from hospital to home.
We hypothesize that interactive VME will lead to non-inferior rates of ability to demonstrate correct inhaler use compared to rates with TTG among hospitalized patients with Asthma or COPD.
For this study we are testing the preliminary efficacy of VME to teach respiratory inhaler technique prior to implementing a larger RCT to test the comparative effectiveness of VME versus TTG.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
The specific aim to test this hypothesis is:
To iteratively test VME to teach correct use of metered dose inhaler (MDIs) and dry-powder Diskus® devices to hospitalized patients with Asthma or COPD. We partnered with software development companies to develop VME modules that (self)-assess and teach respiratory inhaler technique to hospitalized participants. We have tested the VME in focus groups. Now that the VME is developed we will iteratively pilot test (n=30-40) the VME strategy (up to 3 rounds (90-120 total)) to obtain important patient feedback,preferences and preliminary efficacy estimates for the module.
We hypothesize that participants' post-VME inhaler technique will be significantly better than their pre-VME inhaler technique.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years and older
- Admission to the inpatient medical service and surgical service
- Physician-diagnosed COPD or asthma. We will enroll patients even if the primary reason for admission is not COPD or asthma (e.g., patients admitted for heart failure, but with a physician diagnosis of COPD are eligible).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently in an intensive care unit
- Physician declines to provide consent
- Patient unable to provide consent (e.g., history of cognitive impairment, unable to understand English) or declines to provide consent
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:なし
- 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:VME Group
Pre and post VME education group.
The Intervention is the use of the virtual education module rather than the interpersonal educational strategy.
|
Received inhaler education through VME (virtual education module)
他の名前:
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Inhaler Misuse Pre- and Post-VME
時間枠:Up to 30 days
|
Assess patient's inhaler technique using Inhaler checklists by the trained assessor. The primary outcome will be comparing post-intervention to pre-intervention scores; secondary outcome will be 30 days post-discharge visit We will define inhaler technique in two ways:
|
Up to 30 days
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
生活の質 (QOL)
時間枠:30日まで
|
検証済みの疾患固有の QOL ツール (喘息や COPD の QOL ツールなど) を使用する
|
30日まで
|
|
Symptom Burden
時間枠:up to 30 days
|
Assess patient's respiratory symptoms/morbidity, which includes the Borg symptom score, Asthma Symptom Severity Index (ASSI), Chronic Bronchitis Symptom Questionnaire, COPD Severity Score (CSS), Airway Questionnaire (AQ-20), COPD Helplessness Index (CHI) and demographic and other clinical information.
|
up to 30 days
|
|
Self-efficacy of Inhaler Technique
時間枠:up to 30 days
|
Assess patient's confidence in using their inhalers. We will ask patients to report if they: strongly disagree/disagree/neutral/agree/strongly agree with the statement: "I am confident that I know how to use this respiratory inhaler correctly". |
up to 30 days
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Valerie G. Press, MD, MPH、University of Chicago
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- IRB12-1844
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。