此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Pre/Post Pilot Test of Video Module Education

2019年6月3日 更新者:University of Chicago

Pre/Post Pilot Test of VME for the Video vs. TTG Respiratory Inhaler Technique Assessment and InstructioN Study

Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) results in over a million hospitalizations in the United States annually and COPD is the third leading cause of 30-day re-hospitalizations. Clinical trials have established the efficacy of treatments primarily dispensed via respiratory inhaler devices that reduce morbidity and health care utilization if they are used correctly. The effectiveness of these medications in real-world settings is limited by the fact that patients often do not use inhalers correctly. Current guidelines recommend assessing and teaching inhaler technique at all health care encounters, including hospitalization. Over 75% of hospitalized patients in an urban, predominantly underserved population misused their respiratory inhalers, highlighting a missed opportunity to educate these patients with high potential to benefit. Hospitalization, therefore, provides a potential 'teachable moment' to correct this misuse. My preliminary data indicate that one strategy, in-person teach-to-goal (TTG), is effective in teaching hospitalized patients proper inhaler technique and is more effective than simple verbal instruction. While TTG is a promising, several limitations prevent widespread adoption. TTG is time-consuming and costly. Also, reinforcement may be needed, which may be impractical with in-person TTG. One potential method to surmount TTG's limitations is use of interactive video module education (VME) that has the potential to be less costly, maintain fidelity, and be more easily extended into the post-discharge setting than in-person TTG. Before widespread implementation of VME, it is critical to rigorously develop and test VME for inhaler education in the hospital setting. Ultimately, it will also be important to understand patients' ability and willingness to use post-discharge VME for educational reinforcement to allow for this strategy to transition patients across care settings from hospital to home.

We hypothesize that interactive VME will lead to non-inferior rates of ability to demonstrate correct inhaler use compared to rates with TTG among hospitalized patients with Asthma or COPD.

For this study we are testing the preliminary efficacy of VME to teach respiratory inhaler technique prior to implementing a larger RCT to test the comparative effectiveness of VME versus TTG.

研究概览

地位

完全的

详细说明

The specific aim to test this hypothesis is:

To iteratively test VME to teach correct use of metered dose inhaler (MDIs) and dry-powder Diskus® devices to hospitalized patients with Asthma or COPD. We partnered with software development companies to develop VME modules that (self)-assess and teach respiratory inhaler technique to hospitalized participants. We have tested the VME in focus groups. Now that the VME is developed we will iteratively pilot test (n=30-40) the VME strategy (up to 3 rounds (90-120 total)) to obtain important patient feedback,preferences and preliminary efficacy estimates for the module.

We hypothesize that participants' post-VME inhaler technique will be significantly better than their pre-VME inhaler technique.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

90

阶段

  • 不适用

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years and older
  2. Admission to the inpatient medical service and surgical service
  3. Physician-diagnosed COPD or asthma. We will enroll patients even if the primary reason for admission is not COPD or asthma (e.g., patients admitted for heart failure, but with a physician diagnosis of COPD are eligible).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently in an intensive care unit
  2. Physician declines to provide consent
  3. Patient unable to provide consent (e.g., history of cognitive impairment, unable to understand English) or declines to provide consent

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:卫生服务研究
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:VME Group
Pre and post VME education group. The Intervention is the use of the virtual education module rather than the interpersonal educational strategy.
Received inhaler education through VME (virtual education module)
其他名称:
  • Video Module Education (VME)

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Number of Participants With Inhaler Misuse Pre- and Post-VME
大体时间:Up to 30 days

Assess patient's inhaler technique using Inhaler checklists by the trained assessor.

The primary outcome will be comparing post-intervention to pre-intervention scores; secondary outcome will be 30 days post-discharge visit

We will define inhaler technique in two ways:

  1. Correct Use (i.e., >75% of steps correct)
  2. Mastery (i.e., perfect technique, 100% steps correct)
Up to 30 days

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
生活质量 (QOL)
大体时间:最多 30 天
使用经过验证的疾病特定 QOL 工具(即哮喘或 COPD QOL 工具)
最多 30 天
Symptom Burden
大体时间:up to 30 days
Assess patient's respiratory symptoms/morbidity, which includes the Borg symptom score, Asthma Symptom Severity Index (ASSI), Chronic Bronchitis Symptom Questionnaire, COPD Severity Score (CSS), Airway Questionnaire (AQ-20), COPD Helplessness Index (CHI) and demographic and other clinical information.
up to 30 days
Self-efficacy of Inhaler Technique
大体时间:up to 30 days

Assess patient's confidence in using their inhalers.

We will ask patients to report if they: strongly disagree/disagree/neutral/agree/strongly agree with the statement: "I am confident that I know how to use this respiratory inhaler correctly".

up to 30 days

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Valerie G. Press, MD, MPH、University of Chicago

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2014年11月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2015年10月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2015年10月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2014年10月10日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2014年10月28日

首次发布 (估计)

2014年10月29日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2019年6月4日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2019年6月3日

最后验证

2019年2月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • IRB12-1844

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

VME Group的临床试验

3
订阅