Pre/Post Pilot Test of Video Module Education

Pre/Post Pilot Test of VME for the Video vs. TTG Respiratory Inhaler Technique Assessment and InstructioN Study

Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) results in over a million hospitalizations in the United States annually and COPD is the third leading cause of 30-day re-hospitalizations. Clinical trials have established the efficacy of treatments primarily dispensed via respiratory inhaler devices that reduce morbidity and health care utilization if they are used correctly. The effectiveness of these medications in real-world settings is limited by the fact that patients often do not use inhalers correctly. Current guidelines recommend assessing and teaching inhaler technique at all health care encounters, including hospitalization. Over 75% of hospitalized patients in an urban, predominantly underserved population misused their respiratory inhalers, highlighting a missed opportunity to educate these patients with high potential to benefit. Hospitalization, therefore, provides a potential 'teachable moment' to correct this misuse. My preliminary data indicate that one strategy, in-person teach-to-goal (TTG), is effective in teaching hospitalized patients proper inhaler technique and is more effective than simple verbal instruction. While TTG is a promising, several limitations prevent widespread adoption. TTG is time-consuming and costly. Also, reinforcement may be needed, which may be impractical with in-person TTG. One potential method to surmount TTG's limitations is use of interactive video module education (VME) that has the potential to be less costly, maintain fidelity, and be more easily extended into the post-discharge setting than in-person TTG. Before widespread implementation of VME, it is critical to rigorously develop and test VME for inhaler education in the hospital setting. Ultimately, it will also be important to understand patients' ability and willingness to use post-discharge VME for educational reinforcement to allow for this strategy to transition patients across care settings from hospital to home.

We hypothesize that interactive VME will lead to non-inferior rates of ability to demonstrate correct inhaler use compared to rates with TTG among hospitalized patients with Asthma or COPD.

For this study we are testing the preliminary efficacy of VME to teach respiratory inhaler technique prior to implementing a larger RCT to test the comparative effectiveness of VME versus TTG.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Asthma
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: VME Group

Detailed Description

The specific aim to test this hypothesis is:

To iteratively test VME to teach correct use of metered dose inhaler (MDIs) and dry-powder Diskus® devices to hospitalized patients with Asthma or COPD. We partnered with software development companies to develop VME modules that (self)-assess and teach respiratory inhaler technique to hospitalized participants. We have tested the VME in focus groups. Now that the VME is developed we will iteratively pilot test (n=30-40) the VME strategy (up to 3 rounds (90-120 total)) to obtain important patient feedback,preferences and preliminary efficacy estimates for the module.

We hypothesize that participants' post-VME inhaler technique will be significantly better than their pre-VME inhaler technique.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 90
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18 years and older
2. Admission to the inpatient medical service and surgical service
3. Physician-diagnosed COPD or asthma. We will enroll patients even if the primary reason for admission is not COPD or asthma (e.g., patients admitted for heart failure, but with a physician diagnosis of COPD are eligible).

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Currently in an intensive care unit
2. Physician declines to provide consent
3. Patient unable to provide consent (e.g., history of cognitive impairment, unable to understand English) or declines to provide consent

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VME Group; Pre and post VME education group. The Intervention is the use of the virtual education module rather than the interpersonal educational strategy.	Behavioral: VME Group; Received inhaler education through VME (virtual education module); Other Names: Video Module Education (VME)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Participants With Inhaler Misuse Pre- and Post-VME	Assess patient's inhaler technique using Inhaler checklists by the trained assessor. The primary outcome will be comparing post-intervention to pre-intervention scores; secondary outcome will be 30 days post-discharge visit We will define inhaler technique in two ways: Correct Use (i.e., >75% of steps correct); Mastery (i.e., perfect technique, 100% steps correct)	Up to 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Quality of Life (QOL)	Use validated disease specific QOL tools (i.e., asthma or COPD QOL tools)	up to 30 days
Symptom Burden	Assess patient's respiratory symptoms/morbidity, which includes the Borg symptom score, Asthma Symptom Severity Index (ASSI), Chronic Bronchitis Symptom Questionnaire, COPD Severity Score (CSS), Airway Questionnaire (AQ-20), COPD Helplessness Index (CHI) and demographic and other clinical information.	up to 30 days
Self-efficacy of Inhaler Technique	Assess patient's confidence in using their inhalers. We will ask patients to report if they: strongly disagree/disagree/neutral/agree/strongly agree with the statement: "I am confident that I know how to use this respiratory inhaler correctly".	up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Chicago
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Valerie G. Press, MD, MPH, University of Chicago

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: November 1, 2014
• Primary Completion (Actual): October 1, 2015
• Study Completion (Actual): October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 10, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 28, 2014
• First Posted (Estimate): October 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 4, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 3, 2019
• Last Verified: February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Respiratory Tract Diseases; Lung Diseases; Lung Diseases, Obstructive; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
• Other Study ID Numbers: IRB12-1844