Protein Quality on Appetite Control, Reward-driven Eating, & Subsequent Food Intake
2019年4月30日 更新者：Heather Leidy、University of Missouri-Columbia
The Effects of Consuming Beef vs. Soy-rich Lunch Meals, Matched for Macronutrient Content or Serving Size, on Markers of Appetite Control and Satiety
To determine whether the consumption of a beef-rich lunch improves appetite control, satiety, and energy intake regulation while reducing food reward and food cravings compared to the consumption of a soy-rich lunch when matched for macronutrients and fiber content or when match for serving size.
The mechanisms of action surrounding the differential responses of beef versus soy proteins were also explored.
調査の概要
状態
完了
詳細な説明
A randomized, crossover design, acute study was completed in 21 healthy adults (age 23 ±1 y; BMI: 23.8 ± 0.6 kg/m2) to compare 400 kcal lunch meals varying in protein quality.
Two separate comparisons were performed.
The first comparison consisted of macronutrient and fiber-matched lunches which varied in protein quality: 24 g beef protein vs. 24 g soy protein.
The second comparison matched serving size only: 1 serving of beef (24 g protein with 0 g fiber) vs. 1 serving of soy (14 g protein; 5 g fiber).
For each treatment, the participants completed 2 testing days per lunch treatment.
During the "Appetite Assessment Days," each participant reported to the lab to consume one of the lunch meals.
Pre and 7-h post-lunch appetite and cravings questionnaires were completed throughout each testing day along with plasma, hormonal responses, and plasma amino acid concentrations through repeated blood sampling.
Ad libitum dinner energy intake was also measured.
During the "Reward Assessment Days," the participants reported to our facility to again consume one of the lunch meals.
Pre and post-lunch neural responses to food stimuli, through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), occurred followed by ad libitum consumption of a lunch dessert.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
21
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Missouri
-
Columbia、Missouri、アメリカ、65211
- University of Missouri
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年～30年 (大人)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age range 18-30 y
- Normal to Overweight (BMI: 18-29.9 kg/m2)
- No metabolic, psychological, or neurological diseases/conditions
- Not currently/previously on a weight loss or other special diet (in the past 6 months)
- Not a vegetarian
- Right-handed (necessary for the fMRI analyses)
- Not pregnant
- Meets the MU-Brain Imaging Center Screening Criteria
- Have not given blood (for the American Red Cross in the past 6 months)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age >30 y and <18y
- Under Weight or Obese (BMI: <18 kg/m2 or >29.9 kg/m2)
- Clinically diagnosed with diabetes (Type I or Type II), having an eating disorder, or having any other metabolic, psychological, or neurological diseases/conditions that would influence the study outcomes.
- Currently/previously on a weight loss or other special diet (in the past 6 months)
- Left-handed
- Claustrophobic (≥ 2 past bouts of claustrophobia when exposure to small spaces)
- Do not meet the fMRI criteria established by the MU-BIC (regarding metal implants, etc.)
- Pregnant
- Does not meeting the MU-Brain Imaging Center screening criteria
- Have given blood (for the American Red Cross) in the past 6 months or plan to give blood in the following 6 months
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：他の
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：クロスオーバー割り当て
- マスキング：トリプル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Macronutrient and Fiber Matched BEEF
The participants will consume the macronutrient and fiber matched BEEF lunch on a single testing day.
BEEF contained 33% protein, 43% CHO, and 24% fat; the BEEF meal contained 24 g of beef protein from 96% lean ground beef (Cargill, KS).
Soy fiber (Nutritional Designs, NY) was added to the BEEF meal to match total final content between meals.The participants will consume the serving size matched BEEF lunch on a single testing day.
BEEF contained 33% protein, 43% CHO, and 24% fat; the BEEF meal contained 24 g of beef protein from 96% lean ground beef patty (Cargill, KS).
|
The participants will consume the macronutrient and fiber matched BEEF lunch on a single testing day.
BEEF contained 33% protein, 43% CHO, and 24% fat; the BEEF meal contained 24 g of beef protein from 96% lean ground beef (Cargill, KS).
Soy fiber (Nutritional Designs, NY) was added to the BEEF meal to match total final content between meals.The participants will consume the serving size matched BEEF lunch on a single testing day.
BEEF contained 33% protein, 43% CHO, and 24% fat; the BEEF meal contained 24 g of beef protein from 96% lean ground beef patty (Cargill, KS).
|
|
実験的：Macronutrient and Fiber Matched SOY
The participants will consume the macronutrient and fiber matched SOY lunch on a single testing day.
SOY contained 33% protein, 43% CHO, and 24% fat; the SOY meal contained 24 g of textured soy protein concentrate (Boca Foods, WI).
|
The participants will consume the macronutrient and fiber matched SOY lunch on a single testing day.
SOY contained 33% protein, 43% CHO, and 24% fat; the SOY meal contained 24 g of textured soy protein concentrate (Boca Foods, WI).
|
|
実験的：Serving Size Matched BEEF
The participants will consume the serving size matched BEEF lunch on a single testing day.
BEEF contained 33% protein, 43% CHO, and 24% fat; the BEEF meal contained 24 g of beef protein from 96% lean ground beef patty (Cargill, KS).
|
The participants will consume the serving size matched BEEF lunch on a single testing day.
BEEF contained 33% protein, 43% CHO, and 24% fat; the BEEF meal contained 24 g of beef protein from 96% lean ground beef patty (Cargill, KS).
|
|
実験的：Serving Size Matched SOY
The participants will consume the serving size matched SOY lunch on a single testing day.
SOY contained 24% protein, 49% CHO, and 24% fat; the SOY meal contained 14 g of textured soy protein concentrate (Boca Foods, WI).
|
The participants will consume the serving size matched SOY lunch on a single testing day.
SOY contained 24% protein, 49% CHO, and 24% fat; the SOY meal contained 14 g of textured soy protein concentrate (Boca Foods, WI).
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Eating Initiation
時間枠：1 Day
|
Eating initiation will be measured as the time lapse between consuming the intervention and requesting dinner.
|
1 Day
|
|
Subsequent Food Intake
時間枠：1 Day
|
Ad libitum dinner and snacks were provided.
Energy content and macronutrient content of these eating occasions were assessed.
|
1 Day
|
|
Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (niAUC) of Perceived Hunger and Fullness
時間枠：- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min
|
Computerized questionnaires, assessing perceived sensations of hunger and fullness were completed throughout the testing days.
The questions are worded as "how strong is your feeling of" with anchors of "not at all" to "extremely."
Each reported score can be a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100 mm.
niAUC was calculated for by computing the summation of the average change from baseline score (units of mm) for each time point and the subsequent time point, multiplied by the difference in time (min) between the two measures.
For reported feelings of hunger, a higher score can be interpreted as "feeling more hungry."
For fullness, higher can be interpreted as "feeling more full."
Questionnaires were asked at baseline and about every 30 minutes throughout the day for a total of 20 questionnaires.
|
- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min
|
|
Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (niAUC) of Plasma Total Glucagon-like Peptide (GLP-1) and Total Peptide YY (PYY)
時間枠：- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min
|
The samples were collected in test tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
Protease inhibitors (pefabloc SC and dipeptidyl peptidase) were added to some of the tubes to reduce protein degradation.
The plasma was separated and stored at -80°C.
Plasma total glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) were measured for all time points using the Milliplex multi-analyte profiling magnetic bead-based multi-analyte, metabolic panel, 2-plex assay and Magpix Luminex technologies.
niAUC was calculated throughout the testing period by computing the summation of the average change from baseline score (units of pg/ml) for each time point and the subsequent time point, multiplied by the difference in time (units of min) between the two time instances for a total of 20 blood samples.
|
- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min
|
|
Food Cue-stimulate fMRI Brain Scans
時間枠：3 hours
|
Participants viewed 3 categories of pictures including food, nonfood (animals), and blurred baseline images.
The pictures from each category were presented in blocks of images.
Animal pictures were used to control for visual richness and general interest (i.e., appealing but not appetizing).
To determine the effects of protein type on neural activity associated with food motivation, repeated measures ANOVAs were performed on the brain activation maps within the Brain Voyager software with use of stimulus [food (i.e., appetizing and appealing) vs. nonfood (i.e., animal, nonappetizing but appealing] and protein source (BEEF vs. SOY) comparisons within the macronutrient and fiber-matched condition and the serving size-matched conditions, separately.
The mean percent signal change in the maximum voxel within each region that displayed significant activation after the BEEF and SOY meals was then determined.
Talairach coordinates for each region are presented for each row as (x;y;z).
|
3 hours
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Amino Acids
時間枠：- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min
|
Plasma amino acid concentrations were measured from the pre and hourly postprandial time points until dinner request following the Macronutrient and Fiber Matched BEEF meal and the Serving Size Matched Beef Meal.
An average amino acid concentration was then determined from the change from baseline concentration for all available time points.
Plasma amino acid analyses were performed through the University of Missouri-Columbia Agricultural Experiment Station Chemical Laboratories using cation-exchange chromatography (cIEC-HPLC) coupled with post-column ninhydrin derivatization and quantitation.
|
- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始
2012年5月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2013年12月1日
研究の完了 (実際)
2014年3月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2014年10月24日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2014年11月4日
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
2014年11月7日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2019年5月15日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2019年4月30日
最終確認日
2019年4月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- UMissouri
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。